Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse

Firehouse.com Forum Rules & Guidelines

Forum Rules & Guidelines

Not Permitted or Tolerated:
• Advertising and/or links of commercial, for-profit websites, products, and/or services is not permitted. If you have a need to advertise on Firehouse.com please contact [email protected]
• Fighting/arguing
• Cyber-bullying
• Swearing
• Name-calling and/or personal attacks
• Spamming
• Typing in all CAPS
• “l33t speak” - Substituting characters for letters in an effort to represent a word or phrase. (example: M*****ive)
• Distribution of another person’s personal information, regardless of whether or not said information is public knowledge and whether or not an individual has permission to post said personal information
• Piracy advocation of any kind
• Racist, sexual, hate type defamatory, religious, political, or sexual commentary.
• Multiple forum accounts

Forum Posting Guidelines:

Posts must be on-topic, non-disruptive and relevant to the firefighting community. Post only in a mature and responsible way that contributes to the discussion at hand. Posting relevant information, helpful suggestions and/or constructive criticism is a great way to contribute to the community.

Post in the correct forum and have clear titles for your threads.

Please post in English or provide a translation.

There are moderators and admins who handle these forums with care, do not resort to self-help, instead please utilize the reporting option. Be mature and responsible for yourself and your posts. If you are offended by another member utilize the reporting option. All reported posts will be addressed and dealt with as deemed appropriate by Firehouse.com staff.

Firehouse.com Moderation Process:
Effective immediately, the following moderation process will take effect. User(s) whose posts are determined by Firehouse.com staff to be in violation of any of the rules above will EARN the following reprimand(s) in the moderation process:
1. An initial warning will be issued.
2. A Final Warning will be issued if a user is found to be in violation a second time.
3. A 3-day suspension will be issued if the user continues to break the forum rules.
4. A 45-day suspension will be issued if the user is found to be a habitual rule breaker.
5. Habitual rule breakers that have exhausted all of the above will receive a permanent life-time ban that will be strictly enforced. Reinstatement will not be allowed – there is no appeal process.

Subsequent accounts created in an effort to side-step the rules and moderation process are subject to automatic removal without notice. Firehouse.com reserves the right to expedite the reprimand process for any users as it is deemed necessary. Any user in the moderation process may be required to review and agree to by email the terms and conditions listed above before their account is re-instated (except for those that are banned).

Firehouse.com reserves the right to edit and/or remove any post or member, at any time, for any reason without notice. Firehouse.com also reserves the right to warn, suspend, and/or ban, any member, at any time, for any reason.

Firehouse.com values the active participation we have in our forums. Please ensure your posts are tasteful and tactful. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
See more
See less

Chicken sh*t Nancy Pelosi!!!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by ScareCrow57 View Post
    I'm not saying the DE is a force, simply, on a per capita basis they do better. As a whole California, New York, Texas, Alaska will always produce more than the smaller states like Rhode Island, Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts. When comparing one state to another you have to do it on a normalized scale. In many cases the sheer number of people will sway the balance as will the total size of the state. But looking at the GSP (I know what that is now ) on a per person or per acre basis will tell how productive each really is. If I produce $10 per acre on 100 acres and the fellow next door produces $1 per acre on 10,000 acres I would be far more efficient and hence more productive. The other guy would be using his resources inefficiently and hence wasting far more.
    Now you're moving the goal line to be effiency per individual. The bottom line is the bottom line. And that is what interests capitalists when they invest in a community. The market is where the consumers live. CA is also fortunate with being a coastal state that enables it to be conduit for forreign trade and being a place many want to visit. No offense to those in the Midwest, but few people I've ever met want to visit a wheat field. While the bigger guy may be less efficient he is also wealthier due to sheer volume that is occurring. In the example you provide, you may be ten times more efficient, but your competitor is ten times wealthier. Please explain to me when you were able to buy groceries with efficiency. If the larger farmer has any sense he will do two things immediately. They will buy the smaller guy after they have adopted the methodology to become more efficient. This isn't rocket surgery.

    Originally posted by ScareCrow57 View Post
    I realize I'm not he only one paying high taxes. The problem I have is that out alleged leaders just keep spending money they don't have to buy votes. Taxes need to be reduced as does the spending. Bush got it half right, he cut the taxes. He should have demanded cuts in spending as well.
    Bush reduced the rate of taxation. If you understand how the monetary system operates he has raised taxes tremendously by virtue of the deficits he has both submitted and approved. Deficit spending is tax shifting. And Bush has shifted almost as much as debt as his predecessors combined.
    Last edited by scfire86; 08-07-2008, 10:16 AM.
    They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

    I'm not saying you're stupid. I'm saying you have bad luck when it comes to thinking.

    Comment


    • Just an observation. TomCat1066 seems to write well thought out posts using proper grammar, sentence structure and punctuation. Sort of like someone with an education. And then we have jsin925 who seems to write like a third grader. I wonder if he really does have a degree. And if he does, given his writings, I can understand why he can't get a job.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by scfire86 View Post
        Now you're moving the goal line to be effiency per individual. The bottom line is the bottom line. And that is what interests capitalists when they invest in a community. The market is where the consumers live. CA is also fortunate with being a coastal state that enables it to be conduit for forreign trade and being a place many want to visit. No offense to those in the Midwest, but few people I've ever met want to visit a wheat field. While the bigger guy may be less efficient he is also wealthier due to sheer volume that is occurring. In the example you provide, you may be ten times more efficient, but your competitor is ten times wealthier. Please explain to me when you were able to buy groceries with efficiency. If the larger farmer has any sense he will do two things immediately. They will buy the smaller guy after they have adopted the methodology to become more efficient. This isn't rocket surgery.
        Businesses invest by looking at the ROI. They want to get the most return for each dollar invested. That is the bottom line, what percentage did my investment return?

        NY also has a port, as well as the financial district. And what is really funny is that is where most of the wealth is, yet the state subsidizes their mass transit. If one ignores NYC the state is relatively poor. What is interesting is that the poor areas are republican and the wealthy areas are democratic. That alone says something.

        Bush reduced the rate of taxation. If you understand how the monetary system operates he has raised taxes tremendously by virtue of the deficits he has both submitted and approved. Deficit spending is tax shifting. And Bush has shifted almost as much as debt as his predecessors combined.
        That is sort of what I said. They didn't cut spending when they should have. Our government is worse than business. When business makes poor decisions and looses money they go out of business and file bankruptcy. Government just prints more money and puts us deeper in debt. And the next two clowns running for the president won't help matters either. Both want to spend more than they have.

        I got an idea, How about a balanced budget amendment?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Tomcat1066 View Post
          And yet again you fail to answer this basic question. You say the economy sucks, and use your fruitless job search as an example, yet you won't even tell us what field you are seeking employment in? Come on...do you even have a masters?
          i'm not talking about myself anymore.

          Originally posted by Tomcat1066 View Post
          That quote is one of the guiding principles of communism, socialism, and pretty much every economic system and advocates stealing from those who have been able to achieve and give to those who can't/won't.
          so people should be punished for being poor? are you saying if one is poor it's that person's fault? corporations get welfare, which is a form of socialism. universal healthcare is a form of socialism. public schools are a form of socialism. maybe the fire dept should be privatized?

          Originally posted by Tomcat1066 View Post
          So, tell me then, if you are having such trouble with the job hunt, how are you able to travel out of country to meet with these people? If you can afford to travel out of country, how come you say it would be to expensive to move?
          how presumptuous of you to think i paid for it. the coffee roaster paid for everything.

          Originally posted by Tomcat1066 View Post
          You keep mentioning Milton Friedman. Have you even read any of his work?
          i don't think i mentioned him in my last post, and yes.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by ScareCrow57 View Post
            Just an observation. TomCat1066 seems to write well thought out posts using proper grammar, sentence structure and punctuation. Sort of like someone with an education. And then we have jsin925 who seems to write like a third grader. I wonder if he really does have a degree. And if he does, given his writings, I can understand why he can't get a job.
            And I don't even have a degree

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ScareCrow57 View Post
              Perfect!!! Bravo!!!! I just heard this girl the other night, can't get a job because the economy is bad. Question: So young lady, what is your degree in? Fine Arts.

              Why is it the artsy liberal types are always so quick to blame someone else for their problems?
              you know everytime you buy a bottle of something, a motorcycle, a chair, so on and so forth, someone had to design the bottle, the motorcycle, the chair, and most likely that person went to art school and majored in industrial design, therefore having a degree in fine arts.

              and why use liberal in such a pejorative sense? are you liberal about nothing? do believe in premarital sex, which is a liberal idea?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by ScareCrow57 View Post
                Just an observation. TomCat1066 seems to write well thought out posts using proper grammar, sentence structure and punctuation. Sort of like someone with an education. And then we have jsin925 who seems to write like a third grader. I wonder if he really does have a degree. And if he does, given his writings, I can understand why he can't get a job.
                you seem to think i care what you think about me.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by jsin925 View Post
                  you know everytime you buy a bottle of something, a motorcycle, a chair, so on and so forth, someone had to design the bottle, the motorcycle, the chair, and most likely that person went to art school and majored in industrial design, therefore having a degree in fine arts.
                  And there are a finite amount of jobs for those fields. It's generally a well known fact that, as a fine arts major, you will have difficulty in finding a job in that field. My own mother has a degree in fine arts, and her and her classmates all understood this (she was a non-traditional student so I actually knew her classmates). It isn't difficult to do a bit of research to see what the job market is like before studying something.

                  And, for the record, I don't dog any major. However, when someone majors in Women's Studies, or Philosophy, then complains they can't get a job with the degree? Well, we called all those programs "You want fries with that" degrees for a reason.

                  Of course, jsin925, you're experiencing these same pressures. Please, tell us what your degree is in so we can understand just how bad things are. Otherwise, we have to assume you've got a "you want fries with that?" degree and see no reason to put validity to anything you've related. On the other hand, finding out you have a degree like engineering, computer science, etc, would help us understand what you're saying.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by jsin925 View Post
                    4.depends on where one lives. norway is pretty much socialist and it works out fine for them. venezuela is bolivarian socialist and it works out fine for the majority of people there, that's why hugo chavez has constantly been re-elected, and the rank and file of their military put him back in power when the military brass and the elites tried there coup in 2002. south america is moving towards socialism, and electing presidents who aren't part of the elite (chavez, morales, lula, and the lady in chile, i forgot her name, who is a socialist, single mother, agnostic, and i believe she was tortured under pinochet). what works for the goose doesn't always work for the gander.
                    Are you kidding me? Hugo Chavez?

                    First, let's talk about Norway. Norway has steadily moved away from socialism and more towards personal ownership of capital. It's arguable to even say they were a socialist country as that would imply no private ownership of capital. They have sold off state interests in the petroleum industry, state television stations, and many other industries. Sweden has even privatized their social security program!

                    Did you know that Norway had one of the highest single mother rates in the western world? Why? Because the welfare state of Norway pays unwed mothers....

                    Let's talk about your hero, Hugo Chavez. From the US state department:

                    http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/rm/31740.htm

                    He is a scumbag ruthless dictator who abuses his power, people and spits on democracy. When you violate human rights and use vigilante death squads, I don't know how you can consider that an honest election.

                    He is of the ilk of Hitler, Mussolini, and Castro.

                    I am now firmly in the camp that you do not have a masters degree and I wonder at the level of your secondary education.
                    I am now a past chief and the views, opinions, and comments are mine and mine alone. I do not speak for any department or in any official capacity. Although, they would be smart to listen to me.

                    "The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list."

                    "When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water."

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ChiefKN View Post
                      I am now firmly in the camp that you do not have a masters degree and I wonder at the level of your secondary education.
                      Welcome aboard Chief. We've got a fresh pot of coffee ready

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by jsin925 View Post
                        you know everytime you buy a bottle of something, a motorcycle, a chair, so on and so forth, someone had to design the bottle, the motorcycle, the chair, and most likely that person went to art school and majored in industrial design, therefore having a degree in fine arts.

                        and why use liberal in such a pejorative sense? are you liberal about nothing? do believe in premarital sex, which is a liberal idea?
                        Yes, and those people have jobs.

                        The liberals are claiming that premarital sex is THEIR idea?!?!? I think that there are some prehistory folks that would disagree.

                        The liberals just perfected the art and now can screw a whole country over without marrying them.

                        I am now a past chief and the views, opinions, and comments are mine and mine alone. I do not speak for any department or in any official capacity. Although, they would be smart to listen to me.

                        "The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list."

                        "When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water."

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Tomcat1066 View Post
                          Welcome aboard Chief. We've got a fresh pot of coffee ready
                          That had better be fair market coffee...
                          So you call this your free country
                          Tell me why it costs so much to live
                          -3dd

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by jasper45 View Post
                            What US citizens have been arrested? Which US citizens have been ripped from their homes by the government?

                            Innocent until proven guilty? Come on, we're not talking about crime, were talking about warfare. We're talking about people who are not US citizens who have taken up arms against the United States. We're talking about people who are combating the United States and who have a goal of toppling us as a nation. These are not common criminals, and you know that.
                            None...YET. Today the act has only been used for, as far as is known to the public, for the war on terror. However, that is not its only limits. That is the problem.

                            By the rest of your response, you didn't do the homework assignment. Shame on you. The other statute I mentioned has nothing to do with either terrorism or war, and it relates directly to law abiding, US citizens.

                            Everyone needs to realize that the war on terror is the veil being used by the people currently in power to cover their actual agenda, which is of a much wider scope.

                            Surely your intelligent enough to realize that.
                            Fire Marshal/Safety Officer

                            IAAI-NFPA-IAFC/VCOS-Retired IAFF

                            "No his mind is not for rent, to any god or government"
                            RUSH-Tom Sawyer

                            Success is when skill meets opportunity
                            Failure is when fantasy meets reality

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by jsin925 View Post
                              i'm not talking about myself anymore.
                              Nice cop out. Then we'll assume you're just full of it. We can now disregard your ramblings about your plight as the BS they obviously are.

                              so people should be punished for being poor? are you saying if one is poor it's that person's fault?
                              First, you need to define poor. The poor in this country are far better off any many places in the world. And, is it their fault if they're poor? Depends on the person. If they were born with limited mental capacity, then probably not. Same can be true of physical capacity. However, if they are of average intelligence, physically sound, and are poor, then it's been their decisions that have led them there.

                              Is it a bad thing? Not if it's their choice. But, ultimately, it is up to them to fix it if they're unhappy. Not the government.

                              corporations get welfare, which is a form of socialism.
                              And I dare you to find one post where I say that's OK. Corporations should thrive of fail on their own. Period.

                              universal healthcare is a form of socialism.
                              What makes you think I don't know this? What makes you think I agree with universal healthcare?

                              public schools are a form of socialism.
                              Yes, they are. And look at the crappy job they do of educating people. Your own lack of writing skills should be example enough

                              maybe the fire dept should be privatized?
                              Right. Even though one thing that is the government's responsibility is public safety.

                              how presumptuous of you to think i paid for it. the coffee roaster paid for everything.
                              How presumptuous of you to expect me to be a freaking mind reader. Why then, did a coffee roaster, pay for you to travel out of country on this little trip? Inquiring minds want to know.



                              i don't think i mentioned him in my last post, and yes.
                              Really? That's funny, because you seem to think of him as a socialist when in fact he was actually against government involvement in the free market economy, believing that the free market economy (not that "fair market" BS you've been running on about) lead to political and social freedom.

                              Maybe it's time to reread? It sounds like you're thinking Keynes instead.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by ChiefKN View Post
                                Are you kidding me? Hugo Chavez?

                                First, let's talk about Norway. Norway has steadily moved away from socialism and more towards personal ownership of capital. It's arguable to even say they were a socialist country as that would imply no private ownership of capital. They have sold off state interests in the petroleum industry, state television stations, and many other industries. Sweden has even privatized their social security program!

                                Did you know that Norway had one of the highest single mother rates in the western world? Why? Because the welfare state of Norway pays unwed mothers....

                                Let's talk about your hero, Hugo Chavez. From the US state department:

                                http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/rm/31740.htm

                                He is a scumbag ruthless dictator who abuses his power, people and spits on democracy. When you violate human rights and use vigilante death squads, I don't know how you can consider that an honest election.

                                He is of the ilk of Hitler, Mussolini, and Castro.

                                I am now firmly in the camp that you do not have a masters degree and I wonder at the level of your secondary education.
                                because i mention people you all jump to the assumption that i think this person is a great guy. chavez was democratically elected. last election there were people there to make sure everything was on the up and up, and they declared that the election was kosher. he respected the votes of the people when they voted down his last referendum. what dictator does that? i don't believe what the state dept says about him, considering the cia was in on the coup attempt in 2002, and continue to fund his opposition. he is no hitler or mussolini, but he may be a little like castro. he does give poor people here heating oil at a discounted rate. all a pr move, but he still does it.

                                we violate human rights, extraordinary rendition for example, and we kill innocent people. we are no saints.

                                i don't care about the single mother rate in norway. being a single mother isn't an evil to me.

                                Comment

                                300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)

                                Collapse

                                Upper 300x250

                                Collapse

                                Taboola

                                Collapse

                                Leader

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X