Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse

Firehouse.com Forum Rules & Guidelines

Forum Rules & Guidelines

Not Permitted or Tolerated:
• Advertising and/or links of commercial, for-profit websites, products, and/or services is not permitted. If you have a need to advertise on Firehouse.com please contact [email protected]
• Fighting/arguing
• Cyber-bullying
• Swearing
• Name-calling and/or personal attacks
• Spamming
• Typing in all CAPS
• “l33t speak” - Substituting characters for letters in an effort to represent a word or phrase. (example: M*****ive)
• Distribution of another person’s personal information, regardless of whether or not said information is public knowledge and whether or not an individual has permission to post said personal information
• Piracy advocation of any kind
• Racist, sexual, hate type defamatory, religious, political, or sexual commentary.
• Multiple forum accounts

Forum Posting Guidelines:

Posts must be on-topic, non-disruptive and relevant to the firefighting community. Post only in a mature and responsible way that contributes to the discussion at hand. Posting relevant information, helpful suggestions and/or constructive criticism is a great way to contribute to the community.

Post in the correct forum and have clear titles for your threads.

Please post in English or provide a translation.

There are moderators and admins who handle these forums with care, do not resort to self-help, instead please utilize the reporting option. Be mature and responsible for yourself and your posts. If you are offended by another member utilize the reporting option. All reported posts will be addressed and dealt with as deemed appropriate by Firehouse.com staff.

Firehouse.com Moderation Process:
Effective immediately, the following moderation process will take effect. User(s) whose posts are determined by Firehouse.com staff to be in violation of any of the rules above will EARN the following reprimand(s) in the moderation process:
1. An initial warning will be issued.
2. A Final Warning will be issued if a user is found to be in violation a second time.
3. A 3-day suspension will be issued if the user continues to break the forum rules.
4. A 45-day suspension will be issued if the user is found to be a habitual rule breaker.
5. Habitual rule breakers that have exhausted all of the above will receive a permanent life-time ban that will be strictly enforced. Reinstatement will not be allowed – there is no appeal process.

Subsequent accounts created in an effort to side-step the rules and moderation process are subject to automatic removal without notice. Firehouse.com reserves the right to expedite the reprimand process for any users as it is deemed necessary. Any user in the moderation process may be required to review and agree to by email the terms and conditions listed above before their account is re-instated (except for those that are banned).

Firehouse.com reserves the right to edit and/or remove any post or member, at any time, for any reason without notice. Firehouse.com also reserves the right to warn, suspend, and/or ban, any member, at any time, for any reason.

Firehouse.com values the active participation we have in our forums. Please ensure your posts are tasteful and tactful. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
See more
See less

Chicken sh*t Nancy Pelosi!!!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by jsin925 View Post
    well, jose padilla wasn't ripped from his home but he was held without charges, and tortured. we would never know who was ripped away from their home because the government doesn't have to acknowledge having anyone.

    the war on terror is like the war on drugs, unwinnable. terrorism is a tactic, and one can't have a war against a tactic. it's kind of like saying a war on shock and awe.
    You're a hoot. The US government couldn't run a free picnic correctly. Yet you want us to believe all this secret conspiracy crap that would literally take thousands of people to pull off to shut their mouth?

    The war on terrorism is being won. The problem with the war is that, despite us winning, the moment we let down our guard, the war will be back on.

    BTW there Skippy, are you a fire fighter?
    PROUD, HONORED AND HUMBLED RECIPIENT OF THE PURPLE HYDRANT AWARD - 10/2007.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by jsin925 View Post
      did i ever suggest doing nothing? no, i said it's unwinnable as a war, which it is. terrorism is a tactic. in palestine they use terrorism as a tactic. the ira used terrorism as a tactic. the basque used terrorism as a tactic. shock and awe was a tactic and it didn't work.

      you sound like a comic book, "For in the end, good must prevail." next you'll be calling people evildoers like my 9 yr old when he writes his stories. those cats struck the world trade center in '93 and waited 8 yrs until they struck again. they developed their tactics over time. it might be another 8 years until they strike again. who is the enemy? i read a book (i forget what it was called) about special ops in afghanistan, and they said they don't know who they're fighting, who the enemy is or where they are exactly located. the majority of hijackers were from saudi arabia, so why not go to war with saudi arabia?

      interpol would probably do a better job. i don't have any answers, but i know things are bad.

      the american government puts bad people on our payroll like sadaam hussein and bin laden. hussein was cool when he was fighting with iran, and bin laden was cool when he was fighting the russians. we helped put the taliban in power and now they're bad. these people have always been bad, but if they're on our side they're cool. stalin was bad but he was cool during world war two. and don't say the rhetoric about my enemy's enemy is my friend crap either. that's bull***** when you just end up fighting the guy in the end.

      i've never been to war, maybe you have, but my brother fought in the first gulf war, and he's not down with war. did you watch the winter soldiers hearings? a lot of people who fought over there don't see the point. why are we in iraq in the first place?
      The Palestinians use terrorism as a tactic and are losing. The IRA used it and they were defeated. The Basque used it and they were defeated. I do not see your point.

      Shock and awe didn't work? Sure seems to me that the country of Iraq is far better off today than they were in 2003. It sure worked as far as I can see.

      The terrorists who committed murder at the WTC were not "cats". They were our enemy. An enemy who declared war on the US. We didn't go to war with Saudi Arabia because there was, and is, no evidence that it was State-sponsored terrorism by Saudi Arabia.

      You do understand that INTERPOL really doesn't have people who do anything working for them, right? No, of course you don't. INTERPOL is essentially a coalition of member countries. This coalition allegedly coordinates investigations among the law enforcement agencies of those countries. They are, despite occassoional succeses, highly ineffective.

      When you join the US military, they do not ask you to "see the point". This is not a Fortune 500 company. They tell you to shut up and do as you are told. If that offends someone, it is best that they do not join the military.

      Is anyone here "down with war"?

      You never answered me. Are you a FF?
      PROUD, HONORED AND HUMBLED RECIPIENT OF THE PURPLE HYDRANT AWARD - 10/2007.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by jasper45 View Post
        McVeigh was a domestic case, in which our law enforcement actually has jurisdiction. That attack was entirely on our soil, we controlled all aspects of the investigation, the manhunt, and the arrest.
        The FBI has no jurisdiction outside of our Nation.

        Actually, using the military worked pretty well in the '80's. Once the military was shaped up following Carter, and years of neglect, President Reagen chose to use the military in this role.
        As you may recall, there were a series of terror attacks all thru the early to mid 1980's. Several GI's were killed in a Berlin disco bombing, Leon Klinghoffer was killed on the Achille Lauro after he was thrown overboard in his wheel chair by Abu Abbas, and US Navy diver Robert Stethem was murdered on a TWA plane that was hijacked.



        All had some degree of support,approval or involvement by Libya's government and Moammar al-Ghadafi.
        He established himself as a state-sponsor of terror and was the subject of a 1986 air strike by US military forces. What have you heard from Colonel Ghadafi since?

        The military is also better trained, better equipped and more able to take down these savages wherever they are. Most of the Achille Lauro hijackers were essentially taken into custody by US Navy F-14's, to ensure they were truly brought to justice.
        US special forces, as well as the military are in a position to deal with these situations, and these savages appropriately.
        Shock and awe sure worked with ol' Moamar (sp) didn't it?
        PROUD, HONORED AND HUMBLED RECIPIENT OF THE PURPLE HYDRANT AWARD - 10/2007.

        Comment


        • They all make over 100,000 $$ a year. Prob more for most of them b/c of other things. They don't give a **** about us and how much we pay for gas. The can afford it. Most Americans can't go on vacation, they are taking six weeks. Must be nice anyone on here get six weeks off at a time? I don't care if you are a dem or a Rep what they are doing is wrong. They should be at work trying to do something. And kicking everyone out is the biggest piece of $hit thing I have ever head of. What is our country coming to.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by jsin925 View Post
            it's also the same economy that put pinochet in power, and the reason why south america is moving away from it. what's good for the goose isn't always good for the gander. brazil and venezeula have paid off their national debt. can america say the same?
            National debt is irrelevant. Individual economic freedom is the topic. Please try and keep up.

            And yes, there are warts in any economy. However, any socialist economy requires sky high taxes in time as people realize that natural rewards available in a free market economy are gone.

            As for Pinochet? That's politics, not economics. There is a difference after all.

            have you ever bought fair trade coffee, or chocolate? no socialism involved, all capitalism.
            And again I ask, fair trade is fair for whom? I used an example that you apparently skipped over completely, so I guess I can assume that it's exactly how fair trade works?

            if i apply for jobs in my field where i live, there are obviously jobs in my field where i live. my point is that the economy sucks right now. it's more about who you know and not what you know (in the private sector). i have a friend who has an mba and he can't find a full time job. he works three part-time jobs, one delivering subs. regardless of what my major was, the answer you all would give would be to move. if it were that easy, don't you think i would have done that. i have a son who is type 1 diabetic so my wife and i can't go anytime without health insurance. you all want to be judgemental, and offer up tough love solutions.
            Sorry to hear about your son, but you know, every time we turn around you've got another sob story. My God...they could make a movie of the week about you

            As for jobs, there are apparently insufficient jobs for your field, hence using the term "no jobs". But fine there Captain Semantics, whatever you want. There are insufficient jobs. Same for your MBA friend. And your answer is simply "the economy sucks". Guess I'll tell that to my friend who just got her first job with her MBA.

            listen, i've applied to other jobs outside of the field i've studied in, like the fire dept. being a firefighter was always one of my dreams as a kid, and i had a lot of dreams that i have tried to attain. i don't have a defeatist attitude and i believe i can make it here, where i live.
            And just where did anyone call you defeatist?

            well, i do have the education i claim (with great references too), and i am having trouble finding a job (in the private sector) in the field i studied regardless of what you believe. i teach in my field and i am totally aware of the pitfalls and setbacks that come with it. i just can't believe how judgemental you all are. a guy is having trouble finding a job and it's my fault. i'm not against moving, if i have a job lined up. otherwise moving would be stupid.
            Obviously, you have the education you claim, because your mastery of capitalization (something my 7 year old son has mastered) and and reluctance to tell us what it's in

            As for us being judgmental, we're not the one's who offered our situation up as an example of how rough things are. You did. When you use yourself as an example of the evils of the free market economy, this will happen. Every time, on almost every board.

            not at all. it could be from hilter or milton friedman. that's why i said it sounds good, because i have no idea of its origin. please enlighten me. do you know the origin of judge not lest ye be judged?
            Yeah, Matthew 7:1

            And FYI, the quote you agreed with was Karl Marx.

            Comment


            • Good question George...

              Here are the outstanding questions that Jsin has ducked/dodged/failed to answer:

              1. Are you a firefighter?

              2. What is your master's degree?

              3. Did you know that the quote I asked was from Karl Marx?

              4. What economic system in this world is better than capitalism?

              5. Who is fair trade fair to?

              6. Are you really Nancy Pelosi?


              I'm most curious about question 1.
              I am now a past chief and the views, opinions, and comments are mine and mine alone. I do not speak for any department or in any official capacity. Although, they would be smart to listen to me.

              "The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list."

              "When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water."

              Comment


              • Chief,

                In all fairness, he did answer that he didn't know who the quote was from.

                Of course, he only had to be asked twice on that one

                Comment


                • Originally posted by ChiefKN View Post
                  Good question George...

                  Here are the outstanding questions that Jsin has ducked/dodged/failed to answer:

                  1. Are you a firefighter?

                  2. What is your master's degree?

                  3. Did you know that the quote I asked was from Karl Marx?

                  4. What economic system in this world is better than capitalism?

                  5. Who is fair trade fair to?

                  6. Are you really Nancy Pelosi?


                  I'm most curious about question 1.
                  1.not to put all my eggs in one basket, i am testing to become a firefighter. the city i live in is hiring for the first time in 5 yrs and 5 yrs ago i was in graduate school so i missed my chance then to apply. it was one of my dreams as a kid to be a firefighter, but i tried to pursue my other dreams first.

                  2.there are more jobs in the field i studied than there are firefighter jobs. you know, i'm just not going to talk about myself anymore. i wasn't offering up any sob stories, and i didn't ask for any sympathy. just because things work for one person doesn't mean that it'll work for the next. just because someone has a degree in something and found a job in that field doesn't mean it should be just as easy for the next person to. and didn't i say i have an interview comming up with the city. i was talking about the private sector. i guess i learned my lesson. never talk about oneself on these things because people are very judgemental, and love to play the gotcha game, to quote bush. call me a ducker, dodger, i don't care.

                  3.didn't know the quote was from karl marx, but i can agree with things a person says even if i don't completely agree with the person. i agree with some things bush says even though i don't agree with him completely. besides, i said it sounds good, and i don't think karl marx was an evil person.

                  4.depends on where one lives. norway is pretty much socialist and it works out fine for them. venezuela is bolivarian socialist and it works out fine for the majority of people there, that's why hugo chavez has constantly been re-elected, and the rank and file of their military put him back in power when the military brass and the elites tried there coup in 2002. south america is moving towards socialism, and electing presidents who aren't part of the elite (chavez, morales, lula, and the lady in chile, i forgot her name, who is a socialist, single mother, agnostic, and i believe she was tortured under pinochet). what works for the goose doesn't always work for the gander.

                  5.in terms of coffee, both parties, the roaster and the coffee pickers. the coffee roasters are usually american and they buy the coffee beans at a fair market price from the pickers. i went to chiapas, mexico with a local coffee roaster, met with the mayan coffee cooperative they buy their beans from and watched the whole process. it's all capitalism, but done fairly. everyone wins. usually coffee beans are bought for a pittance by large corporations and the quality of the beans are awful. fair trade costs more, but the quality is better. some of starbucks' coffees are fair trade.

                  6.you caught me, i'm really nancy pelosi. i'm slumming on the internet.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by jasper45 View Post
                    What have you heard from Colonel Ghadafi since?
                    last i heard he was going to give louis farrakhan a billion dollars. and didn't reagan drop a bomb on his palace and kill his kids.

                    i think comparing ghadafi to bin laden is comparing apples and oranges. ghadafi didn't have the network that bin laden does. maybe i'm wrong, but i don't think ghadafi had terror cells all over the world, and used islam to justify his actions.

                    bin laden is a megalomaniac, ghadafi actually ruled over a country. if we kill bin laden al qaeda will still go on. bin laden could be dead right now for all we know. ghadafi was like cutting the head off of the snake. but i could be wrong.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by jsin925 View Post
                      2.there are more jobs in the field i studied than there are firefighter jobs. you know, i'm just not going to talk about myself anymore. i wasn't offering up any sob stories, and i didn't ask for any sympathy. just because things work for one person doesn't mean that it'll work for the next. just because someone has a degree in something and found a job in that field doesn't mean it should be just as easy for the next person to. and didn't i say i have an interview comming up with the city. i was talking about the private sector. i guess i learned my lesson. never talk about oneself on these things because people are very judgemental, and love to play the gotcha game, to quote bush. call me a ducker, dodger, i don't care.
                      And yet again you fail to answer this basic question. You say the economy sucks, and use your fruitless job search as an example, yet you won't even tell us what field you are seeking employment in? Come on...do you even have a masters?

                      3.didn't know the quote was from karl marx, but i can agree with things a person says even if i don't completely agree with the person. i agree with some things bush says even though i don't agree with him completely. besides, i said it sounds good, and i don't think karl marx was an evil person.
                      That quote is one of the guiding principles of communism, socialism, and pretty much every economic system and advocates stealing from those who have been able to achieve and give to those who can't/won't.

                      5.in terms of coffee, both parties, the roaster and the coffee pickers. the coffee roasters are usually american and they buy the coffee beans at a fair market price from the pickers. i went to chiapas, mexico with a local coffee roaster, met with the mayan coffee cooperative they buy their beans from and watched the whole process. it's all capitalism, but done fairly. everyone wins. usually coffee beans are bought for a pittance by large corporations and the quality of the beans are awful. fair trade costs more, but the quality is better. some of starbucks' coffees are fair trade.
                      So, tell me then, if you are having such trouble with the job hunt, how are you able to travel out of country to meet with these people? If you can afford to travel out of country, how come you say it would be to expensive to move?

                      And, for the record, what you claim to have witnessed happens every day in a free market economy as well. The corporations who pay pennies for inferior quality beans are a great example of why free market works...you get what you pay for. In addition, if they weren't buying these inferior quality beans, where would they go? What would the growers sell?

                      The quality beans are bought by those willing to pay for the quality. That's free market at work. Call it "fair" market all you want, but it's free market. They are free to sell to whomever they want, and the buyers are free to buy from whoever they want. That is the win/win.

                      When governments impose regulations designed to create "fair" trade, what happens, using your coffee example, is that buyers who can't afford to buy the superior quality beans petition the government, saying they can't compete with company X who is paying more for the beans. The government steps in and tells the grower that they can't sell the beans for more than Company Y can afford to pay, or require them to sell to company Y, despite the fact that the grower could get more.

                      You keep mentioning Milton Friedman. Have you even read any of his work?
                      Last edited by Tomcat1066; 08-07-2008, 10:53 AM. Reason: edited to correct spelling mistake

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by ChiefKN View Post
                        Yea, and Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, and Barrack Obama.

                        You BASTAGE!!!! Now I have to get the Windex and clean the coffee off my screen. You should also include Feinstein and Kennedy

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by GeorgeWendtCFI View Post
                          You're a hoot. The US government couldn't run a free picnic correctly.
                          Would that include the war in Iraq?
                          They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

                          I'm not saying you're stupid. I'm saying you have bad luck when it comes to thinking.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by scfire86 View Post
                            GSP stands for Gross State Product. It is the total amount of goods and services produced in that state. A State's version of the GNP. Do yourself a favor and stop thinking about how DE is a more significant economic force than CA. It isn't close.


                            What makes you believe I don't?


                            And what's your point? As I pointed out the government is us.


                            See above post.


                            I guess there is a point in there somewhere, what I have no idea. How was removing Saddam the right thing to do? In retrospect this foreign policy decision has been a disaster.


                            Welcome to America. I pay the same percent in taxes. It's not like they're only picking on you. I've never had any problems with the Feds. I don't know what you do for a living but that is a choice you made.
                            I'm not saying the DE is a force, simply, on a per capita basis they do better. As a whole California, New York, Texas, Alaska will always produce more than the smaller states like Rhode Island, Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts. When comparing one state to another you have to do it on a normalized scale. In many cases the sheer number of people will sway the balance as will the total size of the state. But looking at the GSP (I know what that is now ) on a per person or per acre basis will tell how productive each really is. If I produce $10 per acre on 100 acres and the fellow next door produces $1 per acre on 10,000 acres I would be far more efficient and hence more productive. The other guy would be using his resources inefficiently and hence wasting far more.

                            I realize I'm not he only one paying high taxes. The problem I have is that out alleged leaders just keep spending money they don't have to buy votes. Taxes need to be reduced as does the spending. Bush got it half right, he cut the taxes. He should have demanded cuts in spending as well.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by jsin925 View Post
                              i believe it was at the airport, but i could be wrong.



                              it worked fine for tim mcveigh.

                              where in history has military operations worked against terrorism?

                              why is it that because i disagree with our strategy one makes the assumption that i believe we should do nothing?
                              Pearl Harbor comes to mind. WWII comes to mind. Military operations will only work when they are not politicized. Unfortunately, this is what happened in Iraq. If the politicians stayed out of it, there would be a success story.

                              FYI, Timothy McVeigh was a home grown terrorist.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by GeorgeWendtCFI View Post
                                I'll take that as meaning you got your Masters in some field that is high in demand like Humanities, Philosophy, Foreign Studies, Ethnic Studies or some other field that companies are beating the door down to hire candidates with. But it's the US economic system's fault you can't get a job. I understand EXACTLY where you are coming from. EXACTLY.
                                Perfect!!! Bravo!!!! I just heard this girl the other night, can't get a job because the economy is bad. Question: So young lady, what is your degree in? Fine Arts.

                                Why is it the artsy liberal types are always so quick to blame someone else for their problems?

                                Comment

                                300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)

                                Collapse

                                Upper 300x250

                                Collapse

                                Taboola

                                Collapse

                                Leader

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X