Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Good Morning - It's a Good Day to be a Republican!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    No.But Barack Hussein Obama seems to have been traveling out of country a lot at outrageous expense when the country should be looking at ways to tighten the budgetary belt. As my Mom said FDR asked during WW II,"Is this trip necessary?".

    No,I won't.I hunt,fish and have a garden in the backyard.I might not eat meat every day but I sure won't starve because,unlike a lawyer,I can fend for myself without help from a government agency.

    In some ways,we are the same country but there have been a lot of changes.You decide for yourself whether those changes are good or not.I might have different opinons from yours.(ya think?)

    It doesn't have explanations of all the big words,either.Are you sure that YOU understood what you read?

    Since we have too many politicians who think that once they get elected to a job,they or a family member should be the only ones who could possibly effectively serve the voters in that office,we have a need for term limits.Whether that should be in effect in your area is up to you and your fellow voters.

    I know a lot of incumbents lost their jobs.How are you so certain that their replacements will fuddle the job before they have had a chance to fail?
    As I said,politicians should run for office,serve a while and then return to their old job to live their life under the laws that they helped pas without any special privileges or health plans that the voters do not have.
    Originally posted by scfire86 View Post
    So because one group did it, that makes it okay for the other.


    Good thing you're not an attorney. You'd starve. So much for the myth of the liberal media protecting Obama.


    Are we the same nation we were back then or has America changed?


    You should read the Washington Expense Account. Your perception of the Founding Fathers is based upon the mythology you learned in grade school and isn't even close to the reality of the lives they led.

    Excerpt:



    You may not like it. There are very few pictures.


    And you're point? We keep re-electing them. I for one don't like term limits. If someone is doing a good job I have the power of term limits in my vote. I guess that makes me the only one here who believes in freedom and liberty.

    Maybe you weren't paying attention, but a bunch of incumbents lost their jobs last Tuesday.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by scfire86 View Post
      Until you have something verifiable your comment is speculative.
      Yes, I was speculating. And not apologizing for it.

      In case you weren't paying attention, Obama isn't the first president to travel abroad.
      Hence, my above statement that I understand that trips abroad are necessary.

      Were you as equally concerned about the cost when Bush, Clinton, Bush, and Reagan were travelling abroad?
      Again, it's not about the fact that the POTUS is traveling abroad. It's not about his political affiliation. It's about the cost of such a trip during the current economy. It's about appearance. He wants to travel abroad at the cost of "millions of dollars" a day (provided within your link), yet we're supposed to throw unadulterated support behind his mission?

      Amazing about the sudden concern for taxpayer dollars that occurs when a Dem is in office. They are supposed to do without. Yet nothing is heard when a GOP is the man.
      When such broad generalities are made, they're easy to take aim at.
      Career Fire Captain
      Volunteer Chief Officer


      Never taking for granted that I'm privileged enough to have the greatest job in the world!

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by BoxAlarm187 View Post
        Again, it's not about the fact that the POTUS is traveling abroad. It's not about his political affiliation. It's about the cost of such a trip during the current economy. It's about appearance. He wants to travel abroad at the cost of "millions of dollars" a day (provided within your link), yet we're supposed to throw unadulterated support behind his mission?
        The same was said by Bush supporters about his detractors. Again the cost is useless without the perspective of the costs of his predecessors. Bush, Bush, and Reagan all traveled when the economy was in stagnation or in a recession. You didn't seem to care then, yet you care now about the cost. Which dispels your claim that it isn't about his political affiliation.

        Originally posted by BoxAlarm187 View Post
        When such broad generalities are made, they're easy to take aim at.
        Yup. And in your case, easily proven.
        They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

        I'm not saying you're stupid. I'm saying you have bad luck when it comes to thinking.

        Comment


        • #34
          Well,because of their majority in the House and the Senate,the Democrats had control of various committees which were supposed to oversee the financial and banking markets but failed to prevent the meltdown which occurred the last years of President George Walker Bush's term.
          Barack Hussein Obama used that as a reason for himself to be elected but appearently found the job too big for his ideas so he stuck with blaming the previous watch for stuff that became his responsibility the day he took the oath of office.
          How is replacing the healthcare plan which was passed unread by the very admission of some senior and now out of office politicians with something that won't strap the economy as much a bad thing?
          There is much hysteria about the current plan even being overhauled without knowing what will be replaced or any other consideration.Some people must thing that they will contract some dread disease if the health care plan is worked over to something that will actually work.
          BTW,has YOUR congresscritter stepped away from the Congresional healthcare to accept coverage under the plan now in effect,just as if he/she was an ordinary citizen and not the "Esteemed Congresscritter from the Great State of..."?
          Originally posted by MarcusKspn View Post
          Here is my predictions, just from watching the last 10 years of politics:

          We will not do very much, and a newly GOP controlled house will blame the previous Democrat controlled house and the mess inherited from 2 years of Obama as the reason.

          Despite all the rhetoric, health care reform will not get repealed. Even the hardcore Republicans in office will realize that you cannot get reelected on a platform of "I took health insurance coverage away from people with preexisting conditions and 25 year olds".

          Domestic surveillance will continue to expand.

          In 2 years there will be another shift back to the Democratic side.

          In 20 years people may finally realize that the two parties are more alike than they are different and we don't really have any choice at all. Democracy in the US is a farce.

          Comment


          • #35
            You could ask that of the Democrats in the Majority of Congress when the banking and housing industries were not being properly watched over as their committees were supposed to be doing.
            When I was in the Navy,if I relieved the previous watch down in the fireroom and found he had not wiped up the oil leaking from a forced draft blower on the on-line boiler,I couldn't call him back to do the job.I had relieved the watch and any problems that were occurring were now my responsibility to take care of.
            If only politicians understod that concept better.

            Originally posted by scfire86 View Post
            You're funny. Don't change. Where was all the change when the GOP controlled congress for 12 years with six of those having a GOP in the White House.

            Now you want us to believe they've seen the light?

            How long will you wait until you hold them accountable for not getting rid of the programs (Social Security, Medicare, Prescription Drugs (passed by GOP) etc) you and the other tea partiers consider socialist?

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by scfire86 View Post
              The same was said by Bush supporters about his detractors. Again the cost is useless without the perspective of the costs of his predecessors. Bush, Bush, and Reagan all traveled when the economy was in stagnation or in a recession.
              You compare the current unemployment rate and housing market to the economies that existed during those previous presidents? I notice that you conveniently left Clinton out of your list of presidents traveling abroad. Why is that? Blind political affiliation as you accuse me of?

              You didn't seem to care then, yet you care now about the cost. Which dispels your claim that it isn't about his political affiliation.
              How do you know I didn't care then? Were you and I exchanging differing political ideals here on FH.com when those presidents (including Mr. Clinton) were in office? No, we weren't.

              I don't care if the current president was the most radically right-winged extremist that had ever been voted into office. I don't care if he was mildly conservative. Or mildly liberal. As I said before, his party ties aren't fueling this debate, it's his choice of when to spend our money on a trip overseas.
              Career Fire Captain
              Volunteer Chief Officer


              Never taking for granted that I'm privileged enough to have the greatest job in the world!

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by BoxAlarm187 View Post
                You compare the current unemployment rate and housing market to the economies that existed during those previous presidents? I notice that you conveniently left Clinton out of your list of presidents traveling abroad. Why is that? Blind political affiliation as you accuse me of?
                I left Clinton out because it is a reasonable assumption conservatives bellyached about his presidential travels. Now all of a sudden you're concerned about presidential expenses when you said nothing for the eight years that Bush travelled to his faux ranch in Texas to clear brush. That wasn't free or no cost to the taxpayers.

                Originally posted by BoxAlarm187 View Post
                How do you know I didn't care then? Were you and I exchanging differing political ideals here on FH.com when those presidents (including Mr. Clinton) were in office? No, we weren't.
                Then prove it. Prove you cared about those expenses back then.

                Originally posted by BoxAlarm187 View Post
                I don't care if the current president was the most radically right-winged extremist that had ever been voted into office. I don't care if he was mildly conservative. Or mildly liberal. As I said before, his party ties aren't fueling this debate, it's his choice of when to spend our money on a trip overseas.
                No one cared about traveling overseas when a GOP was in office. Since we don't know the cost involved for those presidents its a moot point. You're making the assumption that Obama's travels are more than his predecessors. I don't. There is nothing in Obama's travels that are out of the ordinary. Trips to trading partners like India are done to promote commerce with the US. Given that India and the other countries on the list are emerging markets it is a reasonable assumption these trips to promote the US markets and thereby improving trade which is good for our economy.

                I know you find it hard to believe. But there's a whole big world outside your firehouse.
                They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

                I'm not saying you're stupid. I'm saying you have bad luck when it comes to thinking.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by scfire86 View Post
                  I know you find it hard to believe. But there's a whole big world outside your firehouse.
                  Alright, I'm done with this. You're clearly ignoring the fact that I'm not basing my judgement of the overseas trip on the political affiliation of the POTUS, rather the timing of said event.

                  And yes, I'm aware of the world outside the firehouse. My employment has nothing to do with this discussion. Neither does your Class-A sarcasm.
                  Career Fire Captain
                  Volunteer Chief Officer


                  Never taking for granted that I'm privileged enough to have the greatest job in the world!

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by BoxAlarm187 View Post
                    Alright, I'm done with this. You're clearly ignoring the fact that I'm not basing my judgement of the overseas trip on the political affiliation of the POTUS, rather the timing of said event.

                    And yes, I'm aware of the world outside the firehouse. My employment has nothing to do with this discussion. Neither does your Class-A sarcasm.

                    You are wasting your time and getting your bp worked arguing with him.

                    If I didn't know better, one would think it was crowbar writing that stuff.

                    No one is going to like all POTUS no matter what party they are with.
                    Stay Safe and Well Out There....

                    Always remembering 9-11-2001 and 343+ Brothers

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by doughesson View Post
                      BTW,has YOUR congresscritter stepped away from the Congresional healthcare to accept coverage under the plan now in effect,just as if he/she was an ordinary citizen and not the "Esteemed Congresscritter from the Great State of..."?
                      What kind of health care plan do you think is available to congresscritters?

                      But yes, every single one of my congresscritter has the the same plan that is available to ordinary citizens. It's called "If you have health insurance you are happy with, you can keep it."

                      You do realize that there is no "Congress Health Insurance". They pick from the same pool of insurance plans available to every other employee of the federal government. It is run the same way as any other employer runs theirs. The company covers a big portion and the employee covers the rest.

                      The only difference between the federal benefit package is that you have more options to choose from than in the private sector "This health plan doesn't cover anything, but it's the cheapest for the employer" model. You see, the federal model that people love to paint as "a socialist health care plan for congresscritters" actually relies on capitalism. The federal employee pool is a huge market of potential members for any health care plan, and the plans all compete against each other to get your enrollment.

                      http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/hea...s-of-congress/

                      Edited to add:

                      And no, I'm not just posting random things from the interwebs. I'm a federal employee. The guy who mobs the floor at a federal facility has the same health insurance as the guy in DC who writes the laws.
                      Last edited by MarcusKspn; 11-04-2010, 06:26 PM.
                      "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by BoxAlarm187 View Post
                        Alright, I'm done with this. You're clearly ignoring the fact that I'm not basing my judgement of the overseas trip on the political affiliation of the POTUS, rather the timing of said event.
                        Of course you're done. You've been exposed for your hypocrisy and you know it. Obama isn't doing anything that any other president has done during good or bad times. It's clearly evident this is yet another non-troversy that is being trumped up.

                        Originally posted by BoxAlarm187 View Post
                        And yes, I'm aware of the world outside the firehouse. My employment has nothing to do with this discussion. Neither does your Class-A sarcasm.
                        I never said your employment was an issue. It's your parochial mindset that is the issue.

                        There is nothing wrong with this trip or its timing given who is being contacted. The cost is a non-issue given that Obama isn't traveling with any extra considerations for any other president.

                        It's really sad to see the pettiness that has become conservatives such as yourself.
                        They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

                        I'm not saying you're stupid. I'm saying you have bad luck when it comes to thinking.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by scfire86 View Post
                          Blah, blah, blah...
                          Haha, ok, if you say so...
                          Career Fire Captain
                          Volunteer Chief Officer


                          Never taking for granted that I'm privileged enough to have the greatest job in the world!

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by doughesson View Post
                            You could ask that of the Democrats in the Majority of Congress when the banking and housing industries were not being properly watched over as their committees were supposed to be doing.
                            What pieces of regulatory legislation were by blocked Dems from the years 1994 - 2006? The Dems only achieved a majority in Jan. 2007. I love the victimology that has become conservatism. Interesting how you accuse Obama of always blaming Bush when you blame Dems during time periods when they lacked the ability to do anything as the minority party.

                            Originally posted by doughesson View Post
                            When I was in the Navy,if I relieved the previous watch down in the fireroom and found he had not wiped up the oil leaking from a forced draft blower on the on-line boiler,I couldn't call him back to do the job.I had relieved the watch and any problems that were occurring were now my responsibility to take care of.
                            So what? Then you should realize destroying something is a lot easier than fixing it or repairing it. That is what was left to the Dems by Bush and the GOP.

                            Originally posted by doughesson View Post
                            If only politicians understod that concept better.
                            So you'll be critical of the GOP when they start blaming things on the Dem when they are seated in January? I can't wait.
                            Last edited by scfire86; 11-04-2010, 06:35 PM.
                            They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

                            I'm not saying you're stupid. I'm saying you have bad luck when it comes to thinking.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by MarcusKspn View Post
                              What kind of health care plan do you think is available to congresscritters?

                              But yes, every single one of my congresscritter has the the same plan that is available to ordinary citizens. It's called "If you have health insurance you are happy with, you can keep it."

                              You do realize that there is no "Congress Health Insurance". They pick from the same pool of insurance plans available to every other employee of the federal government. It is run the same way as any other employer runs theirs. The company covers a big portion and the employee covers the rest.

                              The only difference between the federal benefit package is that you have more options to choose from than in the private sector "This health plan doesn't cover anything, but it's the cheapest for the employer" model. You see, the federal model that people love to paint as "a socialist health care plan for congresscritters" actually relies on capitalism. The federal employee pool is a huge market of potential members for any health care plan, and the plans all compete against each other to get your enrollment.

                              http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/hea...s-of-congress/

                              Edited to add:

                              And no, I'm not just posting random things from the interwebs. I'm a federal employee. The guy who mobs the floor at a federal facility has the same health insurance as the guy in DC who writes the laws.
                              Well done. Conservatives get their news from outlets that are clearly biased. Yet they claim the media is liberal and not to be trusted since facts don't fit their beliefs.
                              Last edited by scfire86; 11-04-2010, 06:57 PM.
                              They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

                              I'm not saying you're stupid. I'm saying you have bad luck when it comes to thinking.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by BoxAlarm187 View Post
                                Haha, ok, if you say so...
                                Wow. You really got me with that one.

                                Good to know you quickly dissolve into churlish taunts when the facts and your hypocrisy are exposed.
                                Last edited by scfire86; 11-04-2010, 07:12 PM.
                                They told me if I voted for Hillary Clinton the president would be emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable. They were right. I voted for Hillary Clinton and got a president that is emotional, impulsive, and unpredictable.

                                I'm not saying you're stupid. I'm saying you have bad luck when it comes to thinking.

                                Comment

                                300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)

                                Collapse

                                Upper 300x250

                                Collapse

                                Taboola

                                Collapse

                                Leader

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X