Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse

Firehouse.com Forum Rules & Guidelines

Forum Rules & Guidelines

Not Permitted or Tolerated:
• Advertising and/or links of commercial, for-profit websites, products, and/or services is not permitted. If you have a need to advertise on Firehouse.com please contact [email protected]
• Fighting/arguing
• Cyber-bullying
• Swearing
• Name-calling and/or personal attacks
• Spamming
• Typing in all CAPS
• “l33t speak” - Substituting characters for letters in an effort to represent a word or phrase. (example: M*****ive)
• Distribution of another person’s personal information, regardless of whether or not said information is public knowledge and whether or not an individual has permission to post said personal information
• Piracy advocation of any kind
• Racist, sexual, hate type defamatory, religious, political, or sexual commentary.
• Multiple forum accounts

Forum Posting Guidelines:

Posts must be on-topic, non-disruptive and relevant to the firefighting community. Post only in a mature and responsible way that contributes to the discussion at hand. Posting relevant information, helpful suggestions and/or constructive criticism is a great way to contribute to the community.

Post in the correct forum and have clear titles for your threads.

Please post in English or provide a translation.

There are moderators and admins who handle these forums with care, do not resort to self-help, instead please utilize the reporting option. Be mature and responsible for yourself and your posts. If you are offended by another member utilize the reporting option. All reported posts will be addressed and dealt with as deemed appropriate by Firehouse.com staff.

Firehouse.com Moderation Process:
Effective immediately, the following moderation process will take effect. User(s) whose posts are determined by Firehouse.com staff to be in violation of any of the rules above will EARN the following reprimand(s) in the moderation process:
1. An initial warning will be issued.
2. A Final Warning will be issued if a user is found to be in violation a second time.
3. A 3-day suspension will be issued if the user continues to break the forum rules.
4. A 45-day suspension will be issued if the user is found to be a habitual rule breaker.
5. Habitual rule breakers that have exhausted all of the above will receive a permanent life-time ban that will be strictly enforced. Reinstatement will not be allowed – there is no appeal process.

Subsequent accounts created in an effort to side-step the rules and moderation process are subject to automatic removal without notice. Firehouse.com reserves the right to expedite the reprimand process for any users as it is deemed necessary. Any user in the moderation process may be required to review and agree to by email the terms and conditions listed above before their account is re-instated (except for those that are banned).

Firehouse.com reserves the right to edit and/or remove any post or member, at any time, for any reason without notice. Firehouse.com also reserves the right to warn, suspend, and/or ban, any member, at any time, for any reason.

Firehouse.com values the active participation we have in our forums. Please ensure your posts are tasteful and tactful. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
See more
See less

Connecticut JR regs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Connecticut JR regs

    Just wondering what everyone is doing regarding the new regs issued by the the dept of labor. We are having a hard time determining how to fight it. Pretty much undermines the whole program.

  • #2
    why fight it ?

    The regs are put into place to protect the MINORS. My department has been abiding by this sinc 2000. We seem to not have a problem retaining the "cadets" as we call them, and I think right now we have like 8 on the rolls.

    The reqs are not new, they have been around for years. But they came to light after several minor were hurt in a fire truck accident.

    In 2000 our cadet committee sat down with the DOL for its input and they reviewd our program, gave us feedback and when we put thier "new req" side by side with ours - they looked the same.

    this is one thing I would not want to fight.... bad enough when you are a chief officer and you have a lodd or a lodi with an adult... how about the lodd or lodi for a minor ???? ready to carry that burden the rest of your life ?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by kvfc803 View Post
      Just wondering what everyone is doing regarding the new regs issued by the the dept of labor. We are having a hard time determining how to fight it. Pretty much undermines the whole program.
      This is how your next-door-neighbor department is dealing with it (I'm the explorer adviser here on the other side of the mighty river.)

      Almost all of the finalized DOL rules that came out a month or two ago are right in line with our existing in-house explorer rules. Some of them are actually more lenient, such as wearing SCBA for training with proper training. We don't let our explorers wear SCBA at all, period.

      I believe the only thing that really differs is the times they are allowed to participate in calls. Our current rules say no going to calls after 10pm on a school night. I don't have the DOL rules in front of me but I know they drew a line somewhere regardless of it being a school night or not. I'll send you a PM about that.....

      RedRiver: These rules are actually quite new. Sure, there were rules in place before that frankly, most people didn't even know applied to us and were so restrictive, it made a junior/explorer program pointless. The regulations that exist now came after months of meetings and negotiations with the DOL and the fire service. I know because one of our FF's was in those meetings with the state and was instrumental in improving the regulations to what they are now compared to what they were.
      Even the burger-flippers at McDonald's probably have some McWackers.

      Comment


      • #4
        We have already had many of the rules that have been outlined by the "new" policy for years. We at our choosing, have always had a curfew for school nights as well as a no particapation rule at all during midterm and final exam weeks.

        The rules which are in line with ours require a curfew of 10:00 pm.

        I would like to know who is the MORON that added that Jr's cannot respond to fires after 7:00 pm. Yet by law you can stay at the firehouse, attend a meeting, go to a church meeting and even work at your partime job later than 7:00 pm . Whoever added that one was not thinking!!!!

        We have had much of the other stuff in place. So it has really not been a problem. Some of the initial rumors that were flying around were a lot worse than things really are.

        I don't think things will be that bad in KW and NM where all you have is cow flop fires anyway!!!!!
        If I'm not here I'm on http://ctfire-ems.com/indexc.php

        Comment


        • #5
          osfd- Get it right, NM has sheep flop fires not cow flops like we do.

          Anyway, I was just throwing it out for comment to the rest of the state for opinions. It seems the Valley Shore area has been affected recently the most. As a Chief officer, I am not willing to go against the grain on this issue. As important as the JR program is to me, I am not going to loose my house over it. Safety is always the first priority. I will be the first to disagree with DOL on some of it, but just like the NFPA/OSHA guidelines I am not willing to sit in front of a judge and dead JR's parents because I wanted to ignore the rules.

          Happy New Year!!!

          Comment


          • #6
            Thank you for clarifying the sheep vs cow issue. Cows... who would think such thing about us! Baaaah
            Even the burger-flippers at McDonald's probably have some McWackers.

            Comment


            • #7
              I hear ya about violating the rules and going before the judge etc....

              How many Jr's have you seen above 6' or is it 7' packing hose.... No more aren't they lucky!!!!

              Bottom Line is the safety of the kids.
              These programs are a great pipeline for our memberships and they must be maintained. We have quite a few members still on our roster who started as Jr's. We now alomost have a full roster. This past Wednesday 2:00 pm we put 35 Sr. members on the fireground for a fire at the shopping center. Not a bad daytime response.

              Have a safe one, Maybe the three of us can get together in the middle, at a worker, Maybe Clinton Crossing???? A lot less paperwork for us...hehehehehe.
              If I'm not here I'm on http://ctfire-ems.com/indexc.php

              Comment


              • #8
                As long as it isn't the unilever plant!!!
                Even the burger-flippers at McDonald's probably have some McWackers.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Anyone know if these regs are on line somewere??????

                  Thanks
                  LEATHER FOREVER!!!!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    http://www.cga.ct.gov/2006/rpt/2006-R-0772.htm

                    I can quibble were I think they're too restrictive in some places, too liberal in others...

                    So I guess they struck a fair balance

                    Very few changes to how we're currently doing stuff, and I'd be surprised if we took advantage of some of the more liberal stuff -- anyone under 21 still isn't taking apparatus onto a public roadway (you're allowed to pull them in and out of the bays), and I don't see a pressing need to have them operate Hurst tools.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      This year I've started allowing explorers to use the power tools for training. This was prohibited by previous leadership in the past and I've decided to allow it. I'm glad I did. I had our Explorers tear a Volvo to pieces for a drill last month. They had a great time and did a great job. Under proper supervision, there is no problem.

                      Explorers will never be driving any of our vehicles, that much I can assure you.
                      Even the burger-flippers at McDonald's probably have some McWackers.

                      Comment

                      300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)

                      Collapse

                      Upper 300x250

                      Collapse

                      Taboola

                      Collapse

                      Leader

                      Collapse
                      Working...
                      X