Firehouse.com Forum Rules & Guidelines

Forum Rules & Guidelines

Not Permitted or Tolerated:
• Advertising and/or links of commercial, for-profit websites, products, and/or services is not permitted. If you have a need to advertise on Firehouse.com please contact [email protected]
• Fighting/arguing
• Cyber-bullying
• Swearing
• Name-calling and/or personal attacks
• Spamming
• Typing in all CAPS
• “l33t speak” - Substituting characters for letters in an effort to represent a word or phrase. (example: M*****ive)
• Distribution of another person’s personal information, regardless of whether or not said information is public knowledge and whether or not an individual has permission to post said personal information
• Piracy advocation of any kind
• Racist, sexual, hate type defamatory, religious, political, or sexual commentary.
• Multiple forum accounts

Forum Posting Guidelines:

Posts must be on-topic, non-disruptive and relevant to the firefighting community. Post only in a mature and responsible way that contributes to the discussion at hand. Posting relevant information, helpful suggestions and/or constructive criticism is a great way to contribute to the community.

Post in the correct forum and have clear titles for your threads.

Please post in English or provide a translation.

There are moderators and admins who handle these forums with care, do not resort to self-help, instead please utilize the reporting option. Be mature and responsible for yourself and your posts. If you are offended by another member utilize the reporting option. All reported posts will be addressed and dealt with as deemed appropriate by Firehouse.com staff.

Firehouse.com Moderation Process:
Effective immediately, the following moderation process will take effect. User(s) whose posts are determined by Firehouse.com staff to be in violation of any of the rules above will EARN the following reprimand(s) in the moderation process:
1. An initial warning will be issued.
2. A Final Warning will be issued if a user is found to be in violation a second time.
3. A 3-day suspension will be issued if the user continues to break the forum rules.
4. A 45-day suspension will be issued if the user is found to be a habitual rule breaker.
5. Habitual rule breakers that have exhausted all of the above will receive a permanent life-time ban that will be strictly enforced. Reinstatement will not be allowed – there is no appeal process.

Subsequent accounts created in an effort to side-step the rules and moderation process are subject to automatic removal without notice. Firehouse.com reserves the right to expedite the reprimand process for any users as it is deemed necessary. Any user in the moderation process may be required to review and agree to by email the terms and conditions listed above before their account is re-instated (except for those that are banned).

Firehouse.com reserves the right to edit and/or remove any post or member, at any time, for any reason without notice. Firehouse.com also reserves the right to warn, suspend, and/or ban, any member, at any time, for any reason.

Firehouse.com values the active participation we have in our forums. Please ensure your posts are tasteful and tactful. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
See more
See less

Wall Street Journal Article "Not your Fathers FD"

This topic is closed.
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wall Street Journal Article "Not your Fathers FD"

    Who has seen the Wall Street Journal article which questions the need for 4 men on a rig and 2 in 2 out, ect?

    It is titled...As Blazes get fewer Firefighters take on new Emergency roles.

    In a nutshell it describes how fires are down yet number of paid firemen are up. It describes the day of one 2nd generation fireman in a innercity firehouse in Kansas City, MO. During the one tour that this reporter used as his evidence they didn't go to any fires.
    He doesn't site any of the studies that have led NFPA to create 1710. But brings up the politcal power of the IAFF.

    Do you all think that perhaps instead of focusing so much on educating the "public" we should re-drect some of our efforts toward those who hold the purse strings?

    I would post a link but www.wsj.com requires a paid subcription to their site.

    Here are some selected transcripts on nyfd.com b-board:

    What are everybodys thoughts?

    [This message has been edited by FRED (edited 02-12-2001).]

  • #2
    That was the dumbest article I have ever read! The general form of the article didn't make any sense either, It jumped from one point to the other. That reporter had (and still has no clue) of the Fire Service and needs to go back and take a freshman composition course.

    The statements above are my own opinions

    FF Greg Grudzinski
    Oaklyn Fire Dept.
    Station 18-3


    • #3
      I actually agreed with the article. Even though I am a professional fireman with ten years plus experience, I thought that there were some very valid points in the article,
      whether you would like to admit it or not. So what if the writer only rode one tour with a fire company? The same thing is happening or in this case "not happening" everyday across the country. Regardless of how our roles of today are described either as being called a "fireman" or as the article mentioned "first-responder" I feel good knowing regardless of the emergency the public knows to call on us. I have a lot of pride in that.

      Overall I think that the article was right on the mark describing what's happening across the country, not just within the Kansas City FD!

      It's just my oppinion.



      • #4
        I agree with you GBordas. It was an acurate depiction of the day. However the reporter used it to validate the view that we don't need 4 men on a rig ect.

        After studies and recomendations have supported such increases to a minimum of 4 men many localities have 3 or even worse 2 as minimum. Of course it was written with a slant towards its readership (city manager types)

        I think that an article such as this doesn't fully communicate that we are an insurance policy. Our needs are based on the "potential" for fire not the actuall call volume at any time.

        Interesting article though...I think it was way too small to acurately reflect the issue it was trying to tackle.

        Two cents from a fireman


        • #5
          The best was a story about a fire department in my area. They sent a women reporter who knew nothing about the fire service. She spent the day with them went through drills and even some calls. "It was like being on a ride at Disney Land." she said. She wrote about how fun and easy the job is. Basically she made us out like all we do is go "weeeeee oh boy lets ride the fire truck." A couple of days later I was in a deli. The owner who knew I was a firefighter (I was off duty) told me "hey I had a dream I died and when I woke up I was in a fire department uniform, so I knew I was in heaven." I asked him what he ment. He told me about how hard it was to own his own business and how it must be SO easy to be a firefighter and do nothing. I got mad and told him to go f*** himself. But he was right it is the best job in the world. Two months later we put a small fire out in his kitchen. It could have been real bad but it was a good stop. The look on his face was great. We got free lunchs for a few weeks. Then he started calling us whores again. Life is great, you got to love this job.


          • #6
            Sometimes we are our own worst enemy.I work full time as a Fire officer in a Mid-Sized Dept. in a Northeast City. As is always the case when the press decides to ride with us, nothing happens. When something does happen in the middle of the night, they have no one on duty to cover it. When we are at our best, no one sees it. When we are at our worst, it makes headlines. Remember why you do what you do, make no excuses when they ask, and if they still won't leave you alone ask them this, "If you think this job is so easy and great, why don't you do it!?" Then call them an [email protected]#$LE.


            300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)


            Upper 300x250