Let me start by saying I think that NIIMS worked fine before it was changed to the current NIMS. For every call we have gone on for years the ICS system was suppose to be used. We had to learn ICS because its what wildland firefighters are required to use on any fire with federal money. Our State has taught the system as for as long as I have been a firefighter.
Large city fire depts. mainly fights structure fires with a system that is flexible to reflect the size of the event. The names do not change when more equipment or firefighters are added to the call. Side A is still side A. ICS is the same but with an entire new list of names. If you only do structure fires and don’t deal with agencies other than mutual aid departments why would you need to change to a totally new set of terminology?
For us a working structure fire is rare. We are more likely to have a lost elderly person search than a structure fire. The Incident Command System is designed to eliminate the inefficiencies in a call like the ones that are showing up from the Kim family search in Oregon.
Back on topic, the NIMS tests are a joke. The 100 and 200 tests have been rewritten so the questions are better but some still make no sense. If the original group that put the tests together thought that every emergency responder plus all of the politicians and support groups they want to take NIMS would individually set down, read the material, answer the questions and fill in the test on-line with out some “cheating” they are dumber than I think and I think they are really dumb already.
Don’t worry about cheating. If your department is going to ever use ICS the people in charge need to know the terms. The rest can figure it out as you go. Its not rocket science.
Brad
Large city fire depts. mainly fights structure fires with a system that is flexible to reflect the size of the event. The names do not change when more equipment or firefighters are added to the call. Side A is still side A. ICS is the same but with an entire new list of names. If you only do structure fires and don’t deal with agencies other than mutual aid departments why would you need to change to a totally new set of terminology?
For us a working structure fire is rare. We are more likely to have a lost elderly person search than a structure fire. The Incident Command System is designed to eliminate the inefficiencies in a call like the ones that are showing up from the Kim family search in Oregon.
Back on topic, the NIMS tests are a joke. The 100 and 200 tests have been rewritten so the questions are better but some still make no sense. If the original group that put the tests together thought that every emergency responder plus all of the politicians and support groups they want to take NIMS would individually set down, read the material, answer the questions and fill in the test on-line with out some “cheating” they are dumber than I think and I think they are really dumb already.
Don’t worry about cheating. If your department is going to ever use ICS the people in charge need to know the terms. The rest can figure it out as you go. Its not rocket science.
Brad
Comment