Firehouse.com Forum Rules & Guidelines

Forum Rules & Guidelines

Not Permitted or Tolerated:
• Advertising and/or links of commercial, for-profit websites, products, and/or services is not permitted. If you have a need to advertise on Firehouse.com please contact [email protected]
• Fighting/arguing
• Cyber-bullying
• Swearing
• Name-calling and/or personal attacks
• Spamming
• Typing in all CAPS
• “l33t speak” - Substituting characters for letters in an effort to represent a word or phrase. (example: M*****ive)
• Distribution of another person’s personal information, regardless of whether or not said information is public knowledge and whether or not an individual has permission to post said personal information
• Piracy advocation of any kind
• Racist, sexual, hate type defamatory, religious, political, or sexual commentary.
• Multiple forum accounts

Forum Posting Guidelines:

Posts must be on-topic, non-disruptive and relevant to the firefighting community. Post only in a mature and responsible way that contributes to the discussion at hand. Posting relevant information, helpful suggestions and/or constructive criticism is a great way to contribute to the community.

Post in the correct forum and have clear titles for your threads.

Please post in English or provide a translation.

There are moderators and admins who handle these forums with care, do not resort to self-help, instead please utilize the reporting option. Be mature and responsible for yourself and your posts. If you are offended by another member utilize the reporting option. All reported posts will be addressed and dealt with as deemed appropriate by Firehouse.com staff.

Firehouse.com Moderation Process:
Effective immediately, the following moderation process will take effect. User(s) whose posts are determined by Firehouse.com staff to be in violation of any of the rules above will EARN the following reprimand(s) in the moderation process:
1. An initial warning will be issued.
2. A Final Warning will be issued if a user is found to be in violation a second time.
3. A 3-day suspension will be issued if the user continues to break the forum rules.
4. A 45-day suspension will be issued if the user is found to be a habitual rule breaker.
5. Habitual rule breakers that have exhausted all of the above will receive a permanent life-time ban that will be strictly enforced. Reinstatement will not be allowed – there is no appeal process.

Subsequent accounts created in an effort to side-step the rules and moderation process are subject to automatic removal without notice. Firehouse.com reserves the right to expedite the reprimand process for any users as it is deemed necessary. Any user in the moderation process may be required to review and agree to by email the terms and conditions listed above before their account is re-instated (except for those that are banned).

Firehouse.com reserves the right to edit and/or remove any post or member, at any time, for any reason without notice. Firehouse.com also reserves the right to warn, suspend, and/or ban, any member, at any time, for any reason.

Firehouse.com values the active participation we have in our forums. Please ensure your posts are tasteful and tactful. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
See more
See less

Firefighters Dismissed

This topic is closed.
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Firefighters Dismissed

    My name is Jamey Crutchfield. I am one of the five firefighters that was expelled from SGVFD.
    I am writing in plea of anyone who can give us support in our situation. We have been basically shut out by our department and are looking for any info. on how we can maintain our rights to a grievance and to show that our actions did not deem a punishment of expullsion.
    We have seen so many articles and TV coverage that the Chief continually lies to the public but don't know who to turn to to bring this out.
    We have had no luck in finding anyone the Chief has to answer to.
    There has to be a governing body(state, local, or federal), that has some control over him isn't there ???

    Please e-mail me any info thank you Jamey Crutchfield

  • #2
    Jamey, if you posted this, you must have read the other thread on this topic, if not click on this link.

    The general consensus is that you've made your bed, now lie in it. If there is more to this than has been brought about, fill us in. The newspaper article stated that you were an Assistant Chief, is this a butting of heads between you and the Chief? Can you give us more detail, e.g. size of department, number of apparatus, distance away that the funeral was, your departments proximity to the department that lost the firefighter. (If my research is correct, you are a neighboring town).
    Bottom line boils down to disobeying a direct order from the Chief. That's a no-no in any department. There was also the liability issues in that you may not have been insured to take the truck that far out of District, and the lack of coverage within your town.
    To answer your question as far as who does the Chief answer to in a volunteer organization. In New York it's the Board of Fire Commissioners who are elected by the taxpayers of the Fire District. Other states have Councilmen, Selectmen, and others it's directly responsible to the mayor. I can't speak for your dept, you would know better than I.


    • #3
      I have left more info on the forum topic of "poor decision in Sugar Grove"


      • #4
        >>The morning of the funeral, the five fire personnel made a unanimous decision to take the truck, according to Meleen.

        "We knew we would be punished," Meleen said, "but we never dreamed of the severity of the punishment." <<

        Jamie, there's your answer. Yes, the fire chief has higher authority to answer to, and that's probably the reason you were told not to take it. He has to answer to someone else also. Number one, you and four other's took upon yourself to vote on an issue, that utelized a public vehicle, paid for with public funds, and maintained by tax dollars. Number two, you did it knowing you didn't have approval, as a matter of fact you had been denied, Number three, you did it knowing that you would be disciplined. Sorry, "three strikes your out" in my book.

        If my fire chief came to me with this story, I'd back him up 100% on your termination. You don't have the right to use a publicly funded vehicle for your personal travels. The Chief was right in his denial, he was right in terminating you.

        I've got a feeling you may find someone the Chief has to answer to, such as the City Mgr. or the City Commission, but I wouldn't expect much support from them on this. If wasn't the Chief who made the above statements, and in my opinion, as a Commissioner, that would have been enough to say, Good-bye.


        • #5
          Jamey...You screwed yourself. LIVE WITH IT!
          "We live by the rules...we die by the rules"

          iwood51...not every fire district in NY has someone overseeing it. My company is a private corporation that contracts out its services to the town. You could argue that the company answers to the town in that they control the funding, but when it comes to the company itself, it all lies with the chief and/or president.

          Glenn Ralston
          Bay Ridge Fire-Rescue
          [email protected]


          • #6
            firemanjc.....You DISOBEYED a direct order. Plain and simple. No arguments about it. Take your punishment like a man. Sounds like there is a power struggle between you and the chief....You say he lies...You say that you have seen newspaper and TV news and he is a liar...where are the newspaper articles?? Where are the links to the TV stations (most news stations have websites with the day's news in print...)

            If you were my A/C and disobeyed an order....I can most definetly tell you that you would no longer posess a white helmet, and I feel certain you would be outside the station looking in the windows for about 2 months.

            "Loyalty above all else, except honor."


            • #7
              If I were the chief, not only would you have been fired, I would have also filed a police report and had you arrested for theft of public property, and endangering the public for taking the truck out of service...YOU WERE WRONG!!!


              • #8
                I definitely have to agree with the general consensus on this board, you were definitely wrong. Regardless of what you feel about what you were told the chief is still the chief and when he tells you not to do something you don't. And personally, I don't think that there should of been any thought of doing this on you own...just face it you broke the rules and now you are paying the price for it...
                My only question for you is WHAT WERE YOU THINKING? taking a main line engine out of the area...you can show the same respect by just being there you don't need have a truck there!!

                Tom Pysh
                Ellsworth/Somerset V.F.D.


                • #9
                  Like my mom & dad always said as they were punishing me, "You should have thought of that before you did it."

                  Kevin M. Fitzhenry, [email protected]
                  Firefighter, Truck Co. 2
                  City of Bayonne (NJ) FD


                  • #10
                    Firemanjc- I think your (and the 4 others) firefighting days are over....
                    1. Great example you set for everyone else in the depetment, (notice the scarcasim in my voice....) What if a ff disobeyed an order you gave at a fire, someone will probably end up hurt or dead.

                    2. Why did you need the truck to show your support, do you not have dress uniforms of something else you could have worn to show where you were from?

                    3. Your community should eat you alive for the dangers that you put them into.

                    4. I agree with ladderman, consider youself lucky you did not end up in jail.

                    5. you deserve what is/has come to you.

                    just my opinion of course!


                    • #11
                      If all will take the time to visit time http://www.firehouse.com/forums/Forum1/HTML/002401.html

                      you will see how I have explained there is no such thing as a front line truck in SGVFD

                      Also who could be charged with stealing a vehicle that doesn't belong to any one individual ?

                      As was explained on wicu12 channel 12 of Erie PA by one of our Emeritus members the 5 of us ow as much of that truck as anyone else in the dept.

                      The Derrick in Venango county ran an article but I don't know if they have an archive

                      and channel 12 has a website www.wicu12.com

                      It was also in our local paper Warren Times Observer but they dn't have a news website


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by firemanjc:

                        Also who could be charged with stealing a vehicle that doesn't belong to any one individual ?

                        You can't be serious. What if you borrowed the UPS truck when the driver was having lunch. I suppose that would be okay?

                        I understand your point about not having a first line truck. My dept has 4 class "A" pumpers and one more on order, but if I took even the utility pickup truck without permission, scratch that, directly against orders, I would be facing extreme disciplinary matters.

                        What part of this are you not getting.

                        1) You disobeyed a direct order from the Chief.

                        2) You too a truck that belongs to the borough an hour out of jurisdiction without permission and/or necessary insurance coverage.

                        3) You said there were 300 firefighters there from other departments. Do you really think anyone would have noticed whether you were there in a big red truck or on a bicycle.

                        4) You were wrong. Face the music, and/or put your tails between your legs, apologize, and ask to get back on the Department.


                        • #13
                          Gotta disagree with Iwood 51 on point #4---- This is a blessing in disguise----the department is far better off without this guy.


                          • #14
                            Gotta disagree with Iwood 51 on point #4---- This is a blessing in disguise----the department is far better off without this guy.


                            • #15
                              "We have had no luck in finding anyone the Chief has to answer to."

                              Jamey old boy...I think you found out who you answer to...and that's the Chief. You can't possibly be that hard headed not understand that you are in the WRONG. What do you think would happen if a firefighter from one of the large metro departments decided that they were gonna do as they please and take a truck out of service. What makes you so darn special? My hats off to Chief Oaks on a job well done. Your insubordination is as blatant as I've ever seen.


                              300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)


                              Upper 300x250