No announcement yet.

Who does not respond to accidents and why?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Who does not respond to accidents and why?

    I am trying to understand why a Fire Department whose vehicles have Fire/ Rescue painted on them do not respond to accidents with injuries. Last time I check, isn't a vehicle accident with injures under NFPA, labeled as a rescue. If I am wrong, please tell me why? My dept believes if it ran all accidents with injuries, we would run to many calls and lose members. (100% Vol.). I guest I joined the department 25 years ago for the wrong reasons, I thought we where here to serve the community.

  • #2
    Good question. I know of some FD's--I think all of the ones in metro Louisville--stay put until there's confirmed entrapment. I have several concerns about this.

    First, given the response time of EMS in some places (and the fact that FD's are usually much closer), why leave that pt in the vehicle until EMS can arrive and request fire? I certainly don't trust the complainant to let us know accurately whether or not there is entrapment, so EMS is the first agency on the scene qualified to make that determination.

    Second, these oft-ignorant complainants don't know smoke from steam. How long are we allowed to let a car sit and burn? What about haz-mat?

    If that ambulance is held up by bad weather or just getting loose from their previous call, we can still conduct a full extrication and administer 100% of what a BLS ambulance could do. If we don't roll, they sit there.

    And how does that look to the public, half a mile from your station? Right in front of your station? Do they think we just aren't coming? Don't they expect us to be there? Too many calls? Aren't we all burned out on BS fire alarms? It's part of the job.

    I don't like that situation. I want to roll. If we're not needed, we'll go home.
    “I am more than just a serious basketball fan. I am a life-long addict. I was addicted from birth, in fact, because I was born in Kentucky.”
    ― Hunter S. Thompson


    • #3
      The reason why my fire department does not go to accidents is because we have a outdated out of touch with the modern world fire chief. Town council picks the fire chief and it lookes like the only way we can get a new fire chief is if the current one dies (come on MI) He says that "If we are needed there they will call us" I can not tell you how many times I have been driving our rescue truck to a spill call and get passed by the tow trucks going the other way with the cars that were in the accident.
      My department did 210 calls in 01, if we were go to all accidents with reported injuries it would add another dozen calls at the most.
      I will also say that pennsylvania has some of the most outdated regressive old school F*#@ed up fire departments in the country. There are no state training requirements, a WOPPING TWO FULL TIME INSTRUCTORS at Lewistown for a state with @4000 fire departments. You could get rid of 3/4 of the fire chiefs, 1/2 of the fire departments and 1/2 of the fire fighters and the state would be alot safer place to be.


      • #4
        We respond to accidents with injuries with an engine, but sometimes the guys on the heavy rescue wait until they're told they are needed. I disagree with this, as I'd rather get them on the road and NOT need them.

        Also, I've been told that Ohio law says an engine should go to ALL crashes, whether there's an injury or not, but we don't.
        I can think of no more stirring symbol of man's humanity to man than a fire engine.

        --Kurt Vonnegut


        • #5
          If my dept. is notified for an mva (during certain hours / days), we respond with two buses, an engine, heavy rescue, a fire-medic fly-car (when manned and in service), and fire police (when they respond).

          We can have an accident around the corner from the firehouse, and if we are not notified or know about it (walkin), we don't go.

          The large paid municipality which runs paid ambulances ("professional" - notice the quotes ) get mva's, and respond with two police cars, and maybe esb / esu (equivilant to a heavy rescue) if they assign themselves or it comes over as a trauma, pin, or overturn. FD? Yea, we'll get notified if it's a 'washdown' or speedy-dry thing.

          [ 01-04-2002: Message edited by: toneloc177 ]

          May God bless all the people and families who have lost
          their lives on 9-11-01, to those also lost on Flight 587, and to the rescuers who responded to both.

          "I'm not saying it's right, i'm just saying (the way it is)."

          FDNY-EMS - Still New York's Best!

          e-mail always accepted @
          [email protected]


          • #6

            [ 01-04-2002: Message edited by: sgtdave2002 ]

            God Help those who don't improve themselves for the betterment of those who we incharge of..


            • #7
              We are only automatically dispatched on MVCs if there is a report of either entrapment or fire. Otherwise, we respond only at the request of PD or EMS. This is the way it has been as long as I can remember, and it has caused no problems that anyone knows of.

              I'm not arguing for or against the status quo, and I'm not offering any more reasoning behind it or rationale for it. I'm just contributing a data point to your survey.


              • #8
                The large paid municipality which runs paid ambulances ("professional" - notice the quotes ) get mva's, and respond with two police cars, and maybe esb / esu (equivilant to a heavy rescue) if they assign themselves or it comes over as a trauma, pin, or overturn. FD? Yea, we'll get notified if it's a 'washdown' or speedy-dry thing.

                Hey tone you gotta love NCPD (NOT) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!


                • #9
                  [quote]Originally posted by trumpeter75:

                  Also, I've been told that Ohio law says an engine should go to ALL crashes, whether there's an injury or not, but we don't.

                  Been a firefighter in Ohio since 1980. I am not aware of such a law, but perhaps it goes with the law that does designate the Fire Chief as the person in charge of any emergency. Our department does not respond an engine in favor of a multi-purpose truck that is over loaded and under pumped. A city north of us only sends the Fire Department on crashes outside of the city limits or with reported entrapments.

                  IMHO, with the way cars are made and all of the potential hazards involved when you change the configuration of a vehicle through a collision, an engine and a rescue should be assigned to support the ambulance on ANY traffic crash. Things on a scene can change fast, and when the changes occur, you don't have time to wait for additional resources to respond.
                  Richard Nester
                  Orrville (OH) Fire Dept.

                  "People don't care what you know... until they know that you care." - Scott Bolleter


                  • #10
                    In my county, we run an engine and BLS unit on all MVAs with reported injury. If there's the possibility that rescue's needed, then the cavalry (truck, squad/rescue, EMS supervisor, battalion chief) comes along. Personally, when I'm on the ambo, I enjoy having the engine on scene. We get additional trained people to help with patient care, secure hazards, sweep glass, check for spills, etc, and we've got a big piece of steel blocking the roadway so the moron who some day decides that he's not going to go around the scene doesn't kill everyone as he plows on through. Again, just personal preference.
                    Greg Auerweck, EMT-B
                    Rosedale VFC, Sta. 280
                    Baltimore Co., MD

                    The opinions expressed above are those of the author, and are not necessarily representative of the opinions of the Rosedale Volunteer Fire Co., Inc. or any other agency.


                    • #11
                      I work for a multi-agency comm center in the Chicago area. we have 7 fire departments we handle and most send an engine/ambulance response. One of the agencies uses a large response-closest engine,closest ALS,closest BLS,Battalion chief and a heavy rescue. The rescue will go cold unless it is a pin-in or the B/C requests them to run hot. The department I am a firefighter for will run a rescue,engine,ambulance and chief response even if it is a possible injury wreck. If it is a possible pin-in or sounds like an ejection we will have a medi-vac helicopter respond.

                      [ 01-11-2002: Message edited by: PFD147 ]


                      • #12
                        To those that responded, thank you.

                        How do you convince people that all accidents, especially those with injuries should have some type of Fire Apparatus responding? I understand the Chief is in charge and may establish guidelines SOP's for what they want. If you send letters to your government officials indicating proper services are possible not being provided, who are they going to call about it? The old attitude is, if its not broke, don't fix it. I need help with this, because if someone in my family is in an auto accident, I want the cavalry to come, not wait 15 or 20 minutes for the reserves to show up after the ambulance and police arrive. Is it going to take a lawsuit to get someones attention.

                        [ 01-15-2002: Message edited by: 8754 ]

                        [ 01-15-2002: Message edited by: wjn48 ]


                        • #13
                          There are many issues which need to be addressed with this:

                          1. How many accidents are in your first due area?
                          2. Would the volunteers (I'm assuming you're volunteer) in this company be able to handle such an increase in the call volume?
                          3. What about the additional wear & tear on the vehicles? In the end, will this end up costing the fire company, and the taxpayers, more than the limited services that the FD would provide are worth (most of which are already supplied by PD and EMS)?
                          4. What is the current delay when EMS or PD advises that extrication is necessary?
                          5. What is the liability of causing an additional hazard to the public of having another emergency vehicle on the road for the 4th accident of the day - none of which required FD response?
                          6. Do you run on all accidents? Accidents w/ injuries? Accidents w/ unknown injuries? Pedestrian struck?

                          Generally, I think that the FD should respond to accidents w/ injuries. However, there are many aspects of this decision that need to be addressed. Yes, all fire departments are Fire & Rescue (or should be). But, if EMS and PD are already providing all necessary services, then is FD response necessary? It depends on a lot.

                          Stay Safe


                          • #14
                            Being on a Volunteer EMS Squad & Fire Department I have too views on this. #1 from the fire department side, since my town is First responder or EMT certified we SOMETIMES respond to MVA's if its in teh area and we hear it get dispatched chief doesnt care...cause they usually respond anyway to give the squad a hand. If its confirmed pin job PD notifies Dispatch and EMS's rescue goes in service. They usually roll it to some MVA's. But since PD arrives on scene first they update whether fire is needed or not. Now.. from my EMS view. I'm on the squad in the next town over that's Fire Department is capable of Extrication. Heres our little problem. We have a Brand new heavy rescue truck we just purchased and have only used it like 12 times outta 20 due to the fact the Fire dept race like lunatics to the extrication call and sometimes start cutting before we get there ever since they got Extrication Equipment they've been told DO NOT CUT until a ambulance arrives on scene. Prepare to cut whatever but DO NOT CUT. Now we've had incidents where an engine cut off an ambulance & our rescue truck just so they could get in and cut. They've also parked the engine right were the rig needed to be when the patient was removed so we could load and go not carry the patient 30-40ft over dirt & flowers on an island. But back to the question should an engine be dispatched. YES. if the accident is bad enough and PD advises it is bad. we have a couple firefighters on our squad so we know "smoke from steam" and we get so many mvas we know what we are dealing with most of the time. But hey if they have the manpower in your town and you wanna assist EMS sure go for it. By all means nowadays with Volunteer EMS being short handed we could use all the help we can get. I dont know how it is in your towns but we could use some extra help on some days.
                            New Jersey


                            • #15
                              Hey M

                              What are the taxpayers paying for in the forum of Fire Protection? Don't we hear from some EMS personnel complaining that they wish the FD would respond to accidents? It would provide additional assistance at the scene. Also I do not believe its the PD responsibility to be providing Fire protection nor any other crash scene protection other then investigation, traffic flow and towing recovery. I know your in support of some type of response, but who cares how many more calls there would be, the more times you handle these calls the better you become when the more serous incidents happen. I just believe that if your family was involved in an accident, you would want as many people as possible to expedite this unfortunate incident. With that said I am a true believer that having 3 or 4 additional hands are better then 16 or 20 as we do have at times at a crash?s involving entrapment. Until people realize that we owe a full service Fire/Rescue to the community and not pick and choose, this problem will not go away. Remember I was involved in a crash with a dump truck and I was more then grateful for the fire departments being there, it just wasn?t ours.


                              300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)


                              Upper 300x250