Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2-In/2-Out

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2-In/2-Out

    First things first, I want to say that by putting in this quote, it is not a criticism of the department in question, but rather a request for clarification.

    This quote is from a Firehouse mainpage article about a Christmas tree fire that turned fatal.

    "Colbert noted that the first engine arrived driver-only and was unable to enter the structure due to "two-in, two-out" rules. Firefighters knocked the fire down and then used a thermal imager locate the body of the child."

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't 2-in/2-out out the window if there is confirmed entrapment? Looking for clarification, anybody have any?

  • #2
    In cases of rescue, 2 in/2 out does not apply. Once a rescue/recovery has been made...operations have to immediately cease if there still is not enough personnel for 2 in/2 out. What the OSHA inspector told us here is it has to be a feasable situation.....citizen reports of the residents being home, visual confirmation, or other concrete evidence....none of this " Well, we saw a car in the garage and figured someone was trapped..etc"
    I think if this was the entire reason that this incident happened it is a tragedy...but with all the misinformation out there regarding standards it's not unconcievable that this could have happened.

    [ 12-20-2001: Message edited by: firecat1524 ]

    Comment


    • #3
      [quote] Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't 2-in/2-out out the window if there is confirmed entrapment? Looking for clarification, anybody have any?


      You are right. If there is a person traped 2/2 does not apply. I can see it being a gray area though. Like if someone said well "I think" somebody is in there. Then I do not know how it would be ruled. To be honest I have never met a firefighter that would not hesitate to go in anyway. Especially if it might be a child.
      This space for rent

      Comment


      • #4
        Wow, finally a topic I have been wanting to vent over. This topic can be read a couple of ways. My FD does have a 2 in/2 out rule in place, and is pretty much the same as above, unless a bystander tells you theres someone inside or it is obvious that there is someone to be rescued you are to stay outside til there our four personell onscene even if it means that the shift commander and the driver(of the first in engine) have to be the two out. Now we all know that the two out shouldnt be the driver of the first arriving engine or even the shift commander. The two people outside should there just for that reason. So saying all that i'll tell you what i really think, this whole 2 in/ 2 out rule is an excuse for a city or municipality to point fingers at someone other than themselves, for not having enough manpower.

        Now I do realize that times are changing and we in the fire service dont do all of the crazy things that use to be done by our predecessors. However I joined this job knowing that it is inherently dangerous. And i wait for the day that a department gets sued for not going in and dowsing a fire from the interior that could have been extinguished had someone gone in. Its a very gray line we walk across with this issue and I personally dont like it. But ya know what they say opinions are everywhere and we've all got one.

        God Bless our fallen brothers of FDNY. There's not a day that goes by that I dont get choked up wishing that day never happened.



        I would like to say everything expressed in this post is my opinion and not that of my department.

        If anyone has a reason for me to feel differently about 2 in/ 2 out please feel free to e-mail me and try to enlighten me further, as i do accept constructive critisizm.

        Comment


        • #5
          I agree the 2-In / 2-Out rule can be very confusing at times. Personally I don't like the rule. That being said I can't argue that it will not save firefighters lives. However unlike hydrantkatcher I do not think this rule was pushed by any city administrations. Texas not being an OSHA state was not required to abide by this ruling. Then the legislature of our great state adopted Senate Bill 382 which mandates all departments in Texas that are regulated by the Texas Commission on Fire Protection will, among other things, abide by the 2-In / 2-Out rule! There are exceptions included in the legislation. If the fire is in its early stages where the fire can be extinguished with a small hand line or an SCBA is not needed to enter, or a rescue may be indicated, the the rule is out the window. Any department required to abide by this rule that is caught not abiding by the rule is subject to a fine. I would sure like to he an opinion from Mongo on this subject. So far my department has not run into any instance where we were faced with making a decision on whether to enter or not. Can't always depend on luck. Our department is steadily working with our city administration to find the funding necessary to increase staffing. Too many words - gonna shut up now. Let's hear from Mongo.

          Comment


          • #6
            [quote]Originally posted by hydrantkatcher:
            til there our four personell onscene even if it means that the shift commander and the driver(of the first in engine) have to be the two out. Now we all know that the two out shouldnt be the driver of the first arriving engine or even the shift commander. The two people outside should there just for that reason.


            Actually, only one person has to specifically be there to monitor the interior crew. The other "2 out" person can do something else such as pump operator or incident commander.

            The following is from a Q&A report from the IAFF/IAFC:
            [quote]Aside from this individual dedicated to tracking interior personnel, the other designated person(s) is permitted to take on other roles, such as incident command in charge of the emergency incident, safety officer or equipment operator. However, the other designated outside person(s) cannot be assigned tasks that are critical to the safety and health of any other employee working at the incident


            The following is from the "Small Entity Compliance Guide for the Revised Respiratory Protection Standard" Appendix A, Page 37 from OSHA:
            [quote]Q: What duties may the outside firefighters perform in adition to monitoring the inside firefighters?

            A: One of the outside firefighters must actively monitor the status of the inside firefighters and may not be assigned additional duties. The second outside firefighter may be involved in a wide variety of activities. (Skipping to second paragraph)

            Some examples of other activities or duties that are commonly performed by firefighters and amy be performed by one of the outside team members include: pump operations, incident command, the feeding and direction of hose to the entry team, hydrant operations, and outside hose line operation. (Skipping a sentence) Outside firefighters additional duties must be able to immediately discontinue their other work assignments to perform rescue. (Skipping rest of paragraph)


            Ok, so here is what I don't get..."the other designated outside person(s) cannot be assigned tasks that are critical to the safety and health of any other employee working at the incident" but they can be incident command. pump ops, etc...doesn't that seem a little contradicting?
            IACOJ Agitator
            Fightin' Da Man Since '78!

            Comment


            • #7
              this is in my opinion #1 rule of firefighting
              If a guy goes down in a fire you either get him out or stay with him/or her.

              Comment


              • #8
                I have to agree with you Adze it is contradicting, which is why I had made the comment that Chief79 alluded to. Ya see it wasnt too long ago when the league of cities in Florida faught the two in two out ruling in Tallahassee saying that they would have to supply more manpower to abide by it the way it should be. Don't ya just love how politics and our job go's hand in hand. lol



                I would like to say everything expressed in this post is my opinion and not that of my department.

                [ 12-20-2001: Message edited by: hydrantkatcher ]

                Comment


                • #9
                  Hey guys what are they gonna do , give you a
                  10 yard penalty for not having enough players
                  on the field.. EVERY STRUCTURE IS OCCUPIED UNTILL
                  SEARCHED..Let the officials in the booth worry
                  about this crap. If your on the scene you got the ball, run your route and go for the touchdown.

                  MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A SAFE NEW YEAR

                  STAY LOW -STAY SAFE

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I like the theory of 2/2. As a fedral firefighter, I am required to abide by it. However, what about the small volunteer departments that are lucky to have 3 show up for a day time fire? If they are the most proficient firefighters possible, it still comes down to resource.

                    I think that some of these standards are written by people that are use to a > $5,000,000 budget and resources out the whazzzer. Now let the state mandate these standards. Where does that put the fire department running on a $5,000 per year budget?

                    In reality, I am like any other Firefighter. Even if it meant my job, let alone my skinny little life, I would do everything in my power to go after a confirmed victim.

                    Be safe.

                    Merry Christmas everyone.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      [quote]Originally posted by Torched Medic:
                      In reality, I am like any other Firefighter. Even if it meant my job, let alone my skinny little life, I would do everything in my power to go after a confirmed victim.


                      The only exception to the rule is if immediate action is needed to save a life. ie You and one other guy show up and there is someone trapped inside, then the rule is void.
                      IACOJ Agitator
                      Fightin' Da Man Since '78!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Ok, my question is why would you even take a rig to a fire with only a driver. It happens alot in departments surrounding mine. I find it to be relatively ignorant. I am not trying to step on toes as I don't know everything about the call, or anything about the dept. but my dept. will not run with less than 2 on a rig and that is depending on the call, and the driver always stays with the rig.
                        Proud to be IACOJ Illinois Chapter--Deemed "Crustworthy" Jan, 2003

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          One of the most compelling reasons for not responding with only a driver to an incident is chronicled in this tragic event. While I agree that there was an incorrect interpretation of the '2in/2out' standard in this instance, it also shows the folly of sending one firefighter to do the job of a fully staffed company.

                          If this individual had decided to attempt a rescue, in compliance with the OSHA regulation (assuming the adult male who escaped the trailer had notified the firefighter of the child trapped), he would have placed himself in great danger. Most of us, in the same circumstance, would go for the rescue if there was any possibility of effecting it. That is the insidious part of the 'short-staff' mentality of many jurisdictions.

                          It is unfair to this firefighter and his department for the fire service community to criticize from the security of our armchairs. It IS eminently fair for us to criticize the policies of municipalities that allow this situation to occur in the first place.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Try this website. It's a FAQ for the 2-in/2-out rule. Hopes this helps somehow.

                            http://www.iaff.org/safe/pdfs/2in2out.pdf

                            This requires that Adobe Acrobat program.
                            NREMT-P\ Reserve Volunteer Firefighter\Reserve Police Officer
                            IACOJ Attack

                            Experts built the Titanic, amateurs built the Ark.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              In response to kevin37truck's reply, in Texas any department required to abide by the 2-In / 2-Out that is found to be in violation of the rule is subject to a fine. I have not heard of any department being fined as of yet but the law only became effective September 1, 2001. The Texas Commission on Fire Protection is the agency responsible to ensure compliance in Texas. They may at any time inspect run reports or show up on a scene to determine compliance. I agree with the thought that every building is occupied until searched but I'm not sure how the Texas Commission on Fire Protection would view that statement.

                              Comment

                              300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)

                              Collapse

                              Upper 300x250

                              Collapse

                              Taboola

                              Collapse

                              Leader

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X