Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Department That Understands It's Changhng Roles

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Department That Understands It's Changhng Roles

    Home >> Los Angeles Fire Dept. Plans Engine Cutback
    Los Angeles Fire Dept. Plans Engine Cutback
    The Daily News of Los Angeles

    Posted: Sun, 04/24/2011 - 11:28am
    Updated: Sun, 04/24/2011 - 11:28am

    BUDGET: Chief says changes will boost city's ability to respond to medical emergencies.

    Bracing for a $54 million cut in the next budget, Fire Chief Millage Peaks on Friday announced a new plan to reduce the number of fire engines in service while boosting the city's ability to respond to medical emergencies.

    Peaks said the new plan, detailed in a 14-page memo released Friday, brings an end to the rolling brownouts at fire stations around the city, but gives the department flexibility to respond to emergencies.

    "The 2011 Deployment Plan is designed to maximize service delivery under a reduced budget," the memo to all LAFD workers said.

    The plan will be phased in beginning in June and take full effect by July 5.

    Once implemented, it will eliminate one division and two battalion offices; end service by 11 engine companies and seven light forces; upgrade 10 fire companies to paramedic companies; and open an emergency medical service battalion office.

    It eliminates the staff assistant positions from seven battalion companies and renames the remaining staff assistants as emergency incident technicians.

    The changes are partly to reflect the fact that demand for fire service is secondary to the medical calls the department receives. Officials have said more than 80 percent of its calls are for medical care.

    Pat McOsker, president of the United Firefighters of Los Angeles City, harshly criticized the new plan.

    "This is really disgusting," McOsker said. "The mayor and the fire chief came out with a plan to permanently reduce fire company and ambulance protection in neighborhoods throughout the city only two days after the City Council's Personnel Committee voted to hire nine more civilian investigators.

    "The money they are throwing at their pet project would be much better spent keeping a couple of fire companies or ambulances open to protect lives. Closing fire department resources means responses will be delayed to emergencies and that means lives will be lost unnecessarily."

    The Personnel Committee action was taken to hire investigators for the voter-approved Professional Standards Division.

    The proposal is modeled after the Inspector General's Office in the Los Angeles Police Department and was the result of a number of lawsuits and incidents within the LAFD.

    Under the new plan, emergency medical services are being elevated and a new concept of paired battalions is being developed to make sure there is coverage throughout the city.

    Plans are to develop a computerized tracking system of calls to adjust deployments.

    In the San Fernando Valley, which is being renamed from Division 3 to North Division, five engine companies are being closed and two light force companies are being dropped, to be replaced with assessment companies. Also, there are a number of shifts in ambulance service throughout the area.

    The plan is expected to be reviewed by the City Council's Public Safety Committee as well as the Budget and Finance Committee as they review the $6.9 billion proposed by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa


    Like it or not, LA City has realized that they are primarily an EMS organization as compared to fire. While fire is still part of what they do, it is a part of the 20% that is not EMS, and needs to be funded as such with fewer suppression companies and EMS as the priority.
    Train to fight the fires you fight.

  • #2
    You know --- I have tried to give you the benefit of the doubt --- but you post stuff here just to stirr crap.
    ?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by LaFireEducator View Post

      Like it or not, LA City has realized that they are primarily an EMS organization as compared to fire. While fire is still part of what they do, it is a part of the 20% that is not EMS, and needs to be funded as such with fewer suppression companies and EMS as the priority.
      You're only partially correct. LAFD is acknowledging that 80% of their call volume is EMS related.

      The EMS response should be funded to reflect that disparity in call volume, however that doesn't necessarily mean that you should "take" from the Fire response and "give" it to the EMS response.

      To me, the article didn't read as if EMS response was truly enhanced in any significant fashion. It stated that some suppression companies are being disbanded, some are being upgraded to Paramedic non-transport level, a couple chiefs and aides are being eliminated and adding an EMS supervisor. I don't recall seeing anything about putting more transport units on the street.

      So, the net effect is the department being "less able" to respond to all calls. Less suppression units (which they appear to not have been staffing lately) means less units available for initial EMS response and less units available for fire response. Service delivery will be affected. Doesn't sound like much of a "boost" in "ability to respond to medical emergencies" to me.

      To me, this isn't any grand revelation about the services they provide. They didn't just figure out they were "overstaffed" on the fire side. It was a somewhat logical (although controversial) response to a significant budget cut. At an 80/20 split, cutting transport units isn't much of a realistic option. The cutting of the suppression companies is more about the lack of money than it is an emphasis on EMS. The Chief pretty much said as much in the article. It's a change in deployment due to reduced funding.

      Comment


      • #4
        How the heck would you know?

        Seriously, you think you have a real understanding of all that is going on there?

        Get real.
        I am now a past chief and the views, opinions, and comments are mine and mine alone. I do not speak for any department or in any official capacity. Although, they would be smart to listen to me.

        "The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list."

        "When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water."

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by ChiefKN View Post
          How the heck would you know?

          Seriously, you think you have a real understanding of all that is going on there?

          Get real.
          Was this to me or LA?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by FireMedic049 View Post
            Was this to me or LA?
            If I was a gambling man, I'd say LA.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by tfpd109 View Post
              If I was a gambling man, I'd say LA.
              I'm assuming that too given the close proximity of the time stamps, but just wanted to be sure - or at least be sure that he knew it was to him.

              Comment


              • #8
                BUT at least they are not changing their name to FEMS!
                Stay Safe
                Bull


                “Guys if you get hurt, we’ll help you. If you get sick we’ll treat you. If you want to bitch and moan, then all I can tell you is to flick the sand out of your slit, suck it up or get the hell out!”
                - Capt. Marc Cox CFD

                Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result.
                -WINSTON CHURCHILL

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by FireMedic049 View Post
                  Was this to me or LA?
                  Definitly not for you... to the OP.
                  I am now a past chief and the views, opinions, and comments are mine and mine alone. I do not speak for any department or in any official capacity. Although, they would be smart to listen to me.

                  "The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list."

                  "When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water."

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    You know I don't have all the stats and facts to look smart, but here is what it boils down to....for me. If someone is having a cardiac emergency and because of cutbacks the response goes from 3 minutes up to 7 minutes...not a whole lot of harm done..(figuratively speaking, of course)...Now add on the same amount of time for a second due company on a working fire. Alot of Sh*t can go back quick in just a little bit of time when you are playing with fire.

                    I don't have to be reminded that most departments do more ems than fire now. We know. But to start shifting response styles and sogs to adhere more to the ems side and then in turn begin to become stagnant with the fire training and company staffing is asinine. Just my opinion but if we see more and more of this going on then I dread the next couple of years LODDS totals. People pay taxes for fire protection. They expect the same level of fire protection regardless of what percentage of the local FDs calls are for ems.

                    What if i told you that at my FD we just carry a pea can to all fires because they rarely, if ever, require a hose line to extinguish. Like 85% of our fires can be handled with a can...so of the ten engines in my department we keep only one equipped with hose...centrally located of course....

                    I have a feeling you would call me an idiot.

                    We prepare and wait for that 20%. Its that 20% that can kill and will kill if we keep slanting our business towards the other 80%.

                    Im off my box....
                    "It's a living thing brian..."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by truckedup133 View Post
                      What if i told you that at my FD we just carry a pea can to all fires because they rarely, if ever, require a hose line to extinguish. Like 85% of our fires can be handled with a can...so of the ten engines in my department we keep only one equipped with hose...centrally located of course....

                      I have a feeling you would call me an idiot.

                      No, I'd call you a co-worker of LaFireEducator!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by TVFR9923 View Post
                        No, I'd call you a co-worker of LaFireEducator!
                        HAHAHAHAHA, too funny.

                        LaFireEducator, how the frig do have any knowledge of what was going throught the minds of the administrators that made this change? It doesn't matter what amount of their call volume is EMS, this was done for lack of fundings. Which in the long run is more than likely going to come back and bite them in the arse.
                        Last edited by firefightinirish217; 04-25-2011, 12:02 AM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by TVFR9923 View Post
                          No, I'd call you a co-worker of LaFireEducator!
                          no silly I said pea can...not ladders...
                          "It's a living thing brian..."

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Lets take a look at what ACTUALLY happened here:

                            1) remove 11 engine companies
                            2) remove 7 light force companies
                            3) Close 2 battalion chiefs spots
                            4) Close 1 division chief spot
                            5) Upgrade 10 engines to ALS
                            6) Make an EMS BC

                            So, basically: they sent 30 guys (assuming a 3-platoon shift schedule) to paramedic school, and opened up a new BC position. All the while, displacing 174 guys from line companies....RESULTING in SIGNIFICANTLY less coverage. What good is ALS going to do if you increase your response time to a cardiac arrest (theoretically) from 4 to 7 minutes....NOTHING.

                            "Understand it's Changing Roles"? No. Sugarcoating closing companies to meet a budget? Yes.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              And once again, to no ones surprise, LA jumps on a CAREER PAID UNION fire department announcing cuts in line firefighting capability.

                              LA do you wonder why you are so despised by so many here? You shouldn't. It is your almost gleeful willingness to post when career FDs cut staffing. Or your willingness to post ANYTHING negative towards the career fire service.
                              Crazy, but that's how it goes
                              Millions of people living as foes
                              Maybe it's not too late
                              To learn how to love, and forget how to hate

                              Comment

                              300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)

                              Collapse

                              Upper 300x250

                              Collapse

                              Taboola

                              Collapse

                              Leader

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X