Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LDH Hose / cotton vs rubber

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pipeman1822
    replied
    Originally posted by FyredUp View Post
    Chief,

    I have to respectfully disagree with you on this topic. It is far less labor intensive to reload nitrile rubber LDH than jacketed LDH since there is no rolling, no washing, no drying, no racking it and pulling other hose from the rack to load on the engine.

    They have been using LDH for 20 years according to FMNPFD. I would gather by that that they have learned how to lay it to allow for other apparatus to position at the scene.

    I have no doubts that your FD utilizes 3 inch hose in either single or double lays in a manner that works for you. But for me, I would rather lay out the 5 inch nitrile rubber LDH both of my FDs carry and get every drop of water that the hydrant can offer to my engine. If we only need 300 to 500 gpm we can get it, but if things go bad we can get far more without having to lay additional lines or have someone pump the line. I guess I am lazy in that I would rather lay one line that will bring me all the water I will ever need, hose the dirt off from that same line and then reload it right on the scene.

    As for whether to buy rubber or cotton jacketed hose for supply lines that, to me anyways, is a no brainer. Buy the hose that will do the job and call for the least amount of maintenance to put it back in service after a fire.
    I disagree to some extent. You and Hwoods are talking about different sizes. If I used cotton 5" then it would probably be tough. He's talking about 3" and you 5". Big difference.

    I've used rubber 5" back when I worked in the suburbs and now use cotton 3" in a large city department. The 3" is MUCH easier in my opinion. It's very quick to rerack. Yes, it can suck when wet sometimes, but it's not a big deal. As far as cleaning it, we don't do it that often. We lay out several times each tour. When finished we rerack and go in service. Whereas in a suburban department, we would go back to the fire house, clean the hose, and usually put new stuff on.

    It comes down to what works for your department. 3" is much better here because its a large city. Where I worked before, 5" worked. We have more fires in the city but they aren't as big due to our staffing. The suburban department needed more water because it was usually a bigger fire upon arrival. For when we do have large fires, we have six "water supply engines" These engines have 5" rubber LDH. We have them scattered across the city manned by one person if needed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rescue101
    replied
    Originally posted by hwoods View Post
    Bonehead...........



    Seriously, I certainly didn't mean to sound like I was leaning toward Jacketed LDH, I wasn't. And, if this is a Department that has experience with LDH already, Great, they know what they're doing. I took the OP's comments to mean that they would be new to the LDH environment. I've had a bit of experience with DJ Rubber Lined Hose in 3.5 inch size, and it was a bear to use, I can't fathom why anyone would use anything bigger than Three inch using that material. Above Three inch, the (my term) "Plastic" hose is the only way to go......


    Think I'll go back to bed and start over............
    Hehe,GOOD IDEA! Come up to MY neck of the woods and see how much you like 3". I use it for mini guns,PERIOD! EVERYTHING around here is Ldh,we're set up to lay and PUMP MILES of it. And sometimes your nearest hydrant is MILES away. OR NONEXISTANT. 3" doesn't work well on a mile long lay with Hi flows unless you have a BUNCH of Engines. Talk about a cluster. In YOUR neck of the woods(pardon the pun)I'd probably go with the lazy mans lay(3").Well,off to play in the snow. T.C.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nozzle nut 22
    replied
    Our dept has used 5" rubber/ plastic hose for 20+ yrs. Various brands, but the Snap Tite seems to get bought the most.

    Weight of the rolls generally isn't an issue, unless you're loading new/ spare hose in the station. Otherwise youre picking it up flat off the ground. Yeah, it's not a lot of fun, but as Fyred up pointed out, at least you're only doing it once! (maybe twice if you use dual lays) We simply back up along the lay, so you are only lifting a few feet up at a time. Speccing an LDH reel would make this even easier!

    Quick tip: a pry bar slid through the center of the roll makes it easier for two people to handle. Sort of a poor man's hose roller. The person on top can simply pull the end of the hose- it plays off just like it's on a roller.

    The other issues mentioned are best handled through training. Making sure the Truck gets there no later than 2nd due, and/or waiting to charge the line till they go by goes a long way towards eliminating block outs. Of course, we run with 1000 gal in our pumpers, and the quint is first due in the village and much of the rest of the hydranted area. Everyone in our area uses LDH-mostly 5" with some 4 here and there. Even the City of Rochester- long a 3" user has been buying LDH with their new rigs. So, most of us are well versed in the best ways to use it.

    It works well to let the Truck in first, then lay past it- or stop short! ( seeing as how us hosies have to stop at a plug, or drop a line at the end of the drive anyway)

    Leave a comment:


  • tree68
    replied
    Originally posted by lexfd5 View Post
    How about a polyester jacketed hose?

    We use the Ponn Conquest in our department. It works well no problems just drain and load. Tests to 300 psi just like our attack lines. Good hose.

    Wait a second I'm on a ladder company now...what's hose?
    Good point, actually. I'm presuming the OP was actually talking about polyester, not cotton.

    Leave a comment:


  • lexfd5
    replied
    How about a polyester jacketed hose?

    We use the Ponn Conquest in our department. It works well no problems just drain and load. Tests to 300 psi just like our attack lines. Good hose.

    Wait a second I'm on a ladder company now...what's hose?

    Leave a comment:


  • tree68
    replied
    Originally posted by slackjawedyokel View Post
    Always had good luck with the rubber LDH - one heads up --- when it is brand new , it is slick and is a lot easier to accidently dump. You may want to take an extra precaution or two untill it gets a little wear/ dirty.
    It wasn't even new when our engine left 1000 feet of 5" in the road on the way home from a standby. And they didn't even notice - a member whose house they had passed called dispatch...

    The two FF's in the rig got it all loaded in fairly short order.

    There is now an aluminum cover over the head of the hose bed so the wind can't catch it like that again.

    There have been several instances of similar events around here.

    Leave a comment:


  • slackjawedyokel
    replied
    Always had good luck with the rubber LDH - one heads up --- when it is brand new , it is slick and is a lot easier to accidently dump. You may want to take an extra precaution or two untill it gets a little wear/ dirty.

    Leave a comment:


  • FMNPFD
    replied
    Thank you so much for all your input here. We were leaning towards rubber LDH, for reasons pointed out here, having used it for years and are already skilled in it's use. There was discussion among our administration over the weight of 100' rolls, with the DJ being a little lighter and many questions arised as to the difference in the DJ vs. rubber nitrile. We run 5-3 man engines and 2 man truck with a total of 18 FFs on a shift with 8 FFs called in for all double alarms, so manpower has never been an issue. Additionally, we are purchasing a RollnRack powered hose roller to assist in rolling, transporting and loading hose when we can't load on scene. GPMs throughout the city, 95% hydrants, has never been an issue, plenty of water to go around. I really appreciate all your advice here, we really look forward to this much needed upgrade in our department.

    Leave a comment:


  • hwoods
    replied
    Rebuttal..............

    Bonehead...........



    Seriously, I certainly didn't mean to sound like I was leaning toward Jacketed LDH, I wasn't. And, if this is a Department that has experience with LDH already, Great, they know what they're doing. I took the OP's comments to mean that they would be new to the LDH environment. I've had a bit of experience with DJ Rubber Lined Hose in 3.5 inch size, and it was a bear to use, I can't fathom why anyone would use anything bigger than Three inch using that material. Above Three inch, the (my term) "Plastic" hose is the only way to go......


    Think I'll go back to bed and start over............

    Leave a comment:


  • FyredUp
    replied
    Originally posted by hwoods View Post
    There are a number of things to look at here. While appreciating (and agreeing with) Fyred's comments above, I'd have to ask about Staffing Levels. Can your engine crews load wet hose after a job by themselves, or do they have to have some additional crews helping??. I've reloaded Three inch DJ with just two of us, but I don't see a two man crew doing LDH. On the other hand, you run with Four guys all the time, no sweat. Then there's Water: Got plenty, or is it hard to come by?? If my supply is limited, I'm happier with pumping it thru a smaller line. Last, and this is the Biggie. Line Placement. Your Drivers will need to train on where/how to lay the lines so that they don't block Later Arriving Apparatus from reaching the point where they're needed. I just saw a bit of that this past weekend where LDH prevented a Ladder Company from reaching the involved structure. Once LDH is in place and charged, a couple of people aren't going to move it like you do with Three Inch. If I sound like I don't care for LDH, you're right, I don't. For jobs where a lot of water is needed, it's OK, but for your day to day "Bread and Butter" 3-500 GPM jobs Three inch is good enough for me......

    Chief,

    I have to respectfully disagree with you on this topic. It is far less labor intensive to reload nitrile rubber LDH than jacketed LDH since there is no rolling, no washing, no drying, no racking it and pulling other hose from the rack to load on the engine.

    They have been using LDH for 20 years according to FMNPFD. I would gather by that that they have learned how to lay it to allow for other apparatus to position at the scene.

    I have no doubts that your FD utilizes 3 inch hose in either single or double lays in a manner that works for you. But for me, I would rather lay out the 5 inch nitrile rubber LDH both of my FDs carry and get every drop of water that the hydrant can offer to my engine. If we only need 300 to 500 gpm we can get it, but if things go bad we can get far more without having to lay additional lines or have someone pump the line. I guess I am lazy in that I would rather lay one line that will bring me all the water I will ever need, hose the dirt off from that same line and then reload it right on the scene.

    As for whether to buy rubber or cotton jacketed hose for supply lines that, to me anyways, is a no brainer. Buy the hose that will do the job and call for the least amount of maintenance to put it back in service after a fire.

    Leave a comment:


  • hwoods
    replied
    And..............

    There are a number of things to look at here. While appreciating (and agreeing with) Fyred's comments above, I'd have to ask about Staffing Levels. Can your engine crews load wet hose after a job by themselves, or do they have to have some additional crews helping??. I've reloaded Three inch DJ with just two of us, but I don't see a two man crew doing LDH. On the other hand, you run with Four guys all the time, no sweat. Then there's Water: Got plenty, or is it hard to come by?? If my supply is limited, I'm happier with pumping it thru a smaller line. Last, and this is the Biggie. Line Placement. Your Drivers will need to train on where/how to lay the lines so that they don't block Later Arriving Apparatus from reaching the point where they're needed. I just saw a bit of that this past weekend where LDH prevented a Ladder Company from reaching the involved structure. Once LDH is in place and charged, a couple of people aren't going to move it like you do with Three Inch. If I sound like I don't care for LDH, you're right, I don't. For jobs where a lot of water is needed, it's OK, but for your day to day "Bread and Butter" 3-500 GPM jobs Three inch is good enough for me......

    Leave a comment:


  • FWDbuff
    replied
    We had several thousand feet of Neidner jacketed 5" back in the 90's. Believe me when I say this- IT SUCKS, YOU DONT WANT IT.

    When the hose is charged, the inner lining always "turns" inside the outer lining, moving out of alignment with it. As a result, the hose NEVER, EVER lays flat again, even if you roll it before packing it every single time (which by the way you have to do in order to get it to lay somewhat flat.....never mind all the way flat.)

    Trust me. Stick with the single layer rubber hose.

    Leave a comment:


  • PaladinKnight
    replied
    I have to agree with FyredUp. Buy the nitrile rubber LDH. Easier to maintain and will last longer from my experience.

    There just isn't anything pretty about it, but no one really cares about that... do they?

    Leave a comment:


  • FyredUp
    replied
    Originally posted by FMNPFD View Post
    Our department was recently awarded an AFG grant for all new 5" supply hose and appliances for our 7 engines. We are currently going through bidding for 100' sections of hose and are interested in learning the pros & cons of cotton jacketed LDH. We currently use 4" rubber hose and have been for over 20 years. Aside from the ability to pump at higher pressures and the lighter weight, what are the advantages of cotton jacketed hose over rubber hose. Longevity, ability to keep clean, ability to keep dry, serviceability, durability, etc. I would appreciate any feedback any of you out there may have to assist us in this decision. This is a major upgrade for our department and we want to make the most educated and worthwile investment possible.
    Frankly, I see no advantage what so ever in buying cotton jacketed ldh over nitrile rubber hose. The rubber needs only to be hose or wiped down after use. It can be loaded wet. It can be pruchased in attack hose rating and pumped at higher pressures than normal rubber LDH.

    Buy the rubber. If it has served you well why change into a more labor intensive higher maintenance hose?

    Leave a comment:


  • FMNPFD
    started a topic LDH Hose / cotton vs rubber

    LDH Hose / cotton vs rubber

    Our department was recently awarded an AFG grant for all new 5" supply hose and appliances for our 7 engines. We are currently going through bidding for 100' sections of hose and are interested in learning the pros & cons of cotton jacketed LDH. We currently use 4" rubber hose and have been for over 20 years. Aside from the ability to pump at higher pressures and the lighter weight, what are the advantages of cotton jacketed hose over rubber hose. Longevity, ability to keep clean, ability to keep dry, serviceability, durability, etc. I would appreciate any feedback any of you out there may have to assist us in this decision. This is a major upgrade for our department and we want to make the most educated and worthwile investment possible.

300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)

Collapse

Upper 300x250

Collapse

Taboola

Collapse

Leader

Collapse
Working...
X