Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse

Firehouse.com Forum Rules & Guidelines

Forum Rules & Guidelines

Not Permitted or Tolerated:
• Advertising and/or links of commercial, for-profit websites, products, and/or services is not permitted. If you have a need to advertise on Firehouse.com please contact [email protected]
• Fighting/arguing
• Cyber-bullying
• Swearing
• Name-calling and/or personal attacks
• Spamming
• Typing in all CAPS
• “l33t speak” - Substituting characters for letters in an effort to represent a word or phrase. (example: M*****ive)
• Distribution of another person’s personal information, regardless of whether or not said information is public knowledge and whether or not an individual has permission to post said personal information
• Piracy advocation of any kind
• Racist, sexual, hate type defamatory, religious, political, or sexual commentary.
• Multiple forum accounts

Forum Posting Guidelines:

Posts must be on-topic, non-disruptive and relevant to the firefighting community. Post only in a mature and responsible way that contributes to the discussion at hand. Posting relevant information, helpful suggestions and/or constructive criticism is a great way to contribute to the community.

Post in the correct forum and have clear titles for your threads.

Please post in English or provide a translation.

There are moderators and admins who handle these forums with care, do not resort to self-help, instead please utilize the reporting option. Be mature and responsible for yourself and your posts. If you are offended by another member utilize the reporting option. All reported posts will be addressed and dealt with as deemed appropriate by Firehouse.com staff.

Firehouse.com Moderation Process:
Effective immediately, the following moderation process will take effect. User(s) whose posts are determined by Firehouse.com staff to be in violation of any of the rules above will EARN the following reprimand(s) in the moderation process:
1. An initial warning will be issued.
2. A Final Warning will be issued if a user is found to be in violation a second time.
3. A 3-day suspension will be issued if the user continues to break the forum rules.
4. A 45-day suspension will be issued if the user is found to be a habitual rule breaker.
5. Habitual rule breakers that have exhausted all of the above will receive a permanent life-time ban that will be strictly enforced. Reinstatement will not be allowed – there is no appeal process.

Subsequent accounts created in an effort to side-step the rules and moderation process are subject to automatic removal without notice. Firehouse.com reserves the right to expedite the reprimand process for any users as it is deemed necessary. Any user in the moderation process may be required to review and agree to by email the terms and conditions listed above before their account is re-instated (except for those that are banned).

Firehouse.com reserves the right to edit and/or remove any post or member, at any time, for any reason without notice. Firehouse.com also reserves the right to warn, suspend, and/or ban, any member, at any time, for any reason.

Firehouse.com values the active participation we have in our forums. Please ensure your posts are tasteful and tactful. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
See more
See less

Response & Operations on Limited Access Highways

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Response & Operations on Limited Access Highways

    My department is currently looking at updating our response procedures for Operations on Limited Access Highways. I am looking for information concerning how departments deal with incidents that have occurred in the opposite lanes of traffic from the direction the apparatus is traveling in.

    Do you stop on the opposite side of the median and cross over to provide assistance? Do you travel to the next exit and turn around? Do you drop a single responder off at the incident and then travel to a turn around/exit?

    We currently dispatch two Engine Companies, a light rescue, an ambulance, and three police units to these incidents. For much of the interstate highway we cover, we can have an engine coming from opposite directions. This helps prevent us from having to absolutely having to stop in the opposite lanes or travel to the next exit to get a unit on-scene. We are looking to develop some automatic aid policies to deal with areas where this is not possible because of station locations and exits.

    Does anyone know of any legal reason why we would absolutely have to stop to provide aid if it were safer to travel to the turn around and come back?

    Thank you for any help with this matter.

  • #2
    Originally posted by jcfd330 View Post
    My department is currently looking at updating our response procedures for Operations on Limited Access Highways. I am looking for information concerning how departments deal with incidents that have occurred in the opposite lanes of traffic from the direction the apparatus is traveling in.

    Do you stop on the opposite side of the median and cross over to provide assistance? Do you travel to the next exit and turn around? Do you drop a single responder off at the incident and then travel to a turn around/exit?

    My fire department travels to the next exit or turn around to get to the MVA. You want that apparatus on the same side as the motor vehicle accident to assist in blocking and also your not jamming up the other side of the highway. I would never leave a single responder or even two at a scene of highway accident and leave to get the truck turned around. Remember its YOU, then your crew and then your patient. Highways are extremely dangerous and you want to have a safe and organized scene.

    We currently dispatch two Engine Companies, a light rescue, an ambulance, and three police units to these incidents. For much of the interstate highway we cover, we can have an engine coming from opposite directions. This helps prevent us from having to absolutely having to stop in the opposite lanes or travel to the next exit to get a unit on-scene. We are looking to develop some automatic aid policies to deal with areas where this is not possible because of station locations and exits.

    On our highway when we get dispatched for an MVA we have 1 company that responds for our east bound section and a different company to respond on west bound section to assist us. Our general response is 1 Heavy Rescue, 1 Engine, the amount of ambulances depends on injuries and the state police respond on their own as well as local PD. Our mutual aid departments respond with the same response of 1 Rescue and 1 engine.

    Does anyone know of any legal reason why we would absolutely have to stop to provide aid if it were safer to travel to the turn around and come back?

    I've never heard of a law like this in my state of New Jersey. I find that to be a completely dangerous idea and your risking your crews life crossing over unprotected if you are the first arriving unit. If another vehicle loses control and crashed into your scene because you didn't have a truck blocking...its gonna be a very sad day.

    Thank you for any help with this matter.
    Answers in red
    Stay safe!

    Comment


    • #3
      My notes in quotes.....in the quotes message...lol.....
      Originally posted by jcfd330 View Post
      My department is currently looking at updating our response procedures for Operations on Limited Access Highways. I am looking for information concerning how departments deal with incidents that have occurred in the opposite lanes of traffic from the direction the apparatus is traveling in.

      Do you stop on the opposite side of the median and cross over to provide assistance? Do you travel to the next exit and turn around? Do you drop a single responder off at the incident and then travel to a turn around/exit?

      The department I deal with here will respond past the scene if traveling in the opposite direction - go to the NEXT EXIT and turn around.....they do NOT drop anyone off. It can be more dangerous trying to stop opposite an accident - and then as was mentioned you mess up opposite traffic, who is already distracted by the 1st accident. As for EMS - they may use a turn around instead of going to the next exit ( I heard them do that yesterday)....BUT - they have a smaller piece of apparatus - and if the traffic wasn't already at almost a standstill (I know - I was stuck in it!) they would have gone tot he exit like the FD.
      We currently dispatch two Engine Companies, a light rescue, an ambulance, and three police units to these incidents. For much of the interstate highway we cover, we can have an engine coming from opposite directions. This helps prevent us from having to absolutely having to stop in the opposite lanes or travel to the next exit to get a unit on-scene. We are looking to develop some automatic aid policies to deal with areas where this is not possible because of station locations and exits.

      In that case, you may want to consider automatic mutual aid from the closest company to the entrance/exit - that is done in many areas. In the event of an incident, the MA company would be dispatched automatically, with the Chief etc notified of the response. There may or may not be a response from the actual district dept.
      Does anyone know of any legal reason why we would absolutely have to stop to provide aid if it were safer to travel to the turn around and come back?

      - No - you are not 'on scene' - you are still responding.....I could see if the accident infringed into the oncoming lanes - then it may be feasible to stop for protection of that part of the scene. If there is a large median, I would still want 1st due on the accident side for protection, possibly 2nd-3rd due on the other side.....
      Thank you for any help with this matter.

      Comment


      • #4
        - Class two vests for EVERYONE

        - Go around to the next exit and come back. If its just a grass median and you can drive through it, fine.

        - Block all effected lanes and then some with apparatus.
        Even the burger-flippers at McDonald's probably have some McWackers.

        Comment

        300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)

        Collapse

        Upper 300x250

        Collapse

        Taboola

        Collapse

        Leader

        Collapse
        Working...
        X