Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse

Firehouse.com Forum Rules & Guidelines

Forum Rules & Guidelines

Not Permitted or Tolerated:
• Advertising and/or links of commercial, for-profit websites, products, and/or services is not permitted. If you have a need to advertise on Firehouse.com please contact sales@firehouse.com
• Fighting/arguing
• Cyber-bullying
• Swearing
• Name-calling and/or personal attacks
• Spamming
• Typing in all CAPS
• “l33t speak” - Substituting characters for letters in an effort to represent a word or phrase. (example: M*****ive)
• Distribution of another person’s personal information, regardless of whether or not said information is public knowledge and whether or not an individual has permission to post said personal information
• Piracy advocation of any kind
• Racist, sexual, hate type defamatory, religious, political, or sexual commentary.
• Multiple forum accounts

Forum Posting Guidelines:

Posts must be on-topic, non-disruptive and relevant to the firefighting community. Post only in a mature and responsible way that contributes to the discussion at hand. Posting relevant information, helpful suggestions and/or constructive criticism is a great way to contribute to the community.

Post in the correct forum and have clear titles for your threads.

Please post in English or provide a translation.

There are moderators and admins who handle these forums with care, do not resort to self-help, instead please utilize the reporting option. Be mature and responsible for yourself and your posts. If you are offended by another member utilize the reporting option. All reported posts will be addressed and dealt with as deemed appropriate by Firehouse.com staff.

Firehouse.com Moderation Process:
Effective immediately, the following moderation process will take effect. User(s) whose posts are determined by Firehouse.com staff to be in violation of any of the rules above will EARN the following reprimand(s) in the moderation process:
1. An initial warning will be issued.
2. A Final Warning will be issued if a user is found to be in violation a second time.
3. A 3-day suspension will be issued if the user continues to break the forum rules.
4. A 45-day suspension will be issued if the user is found to be a habitual rule breaker.
5. Habitual rule breakers that have exhausted all of the above will receive a permanent life-time ban that will be strictly enforced. Reinstatement will not be allowed – there is no appeal process.

Subsequent accounts created in an effort to side-step the rules and moderation process are subject to automatic removal without notice. Firehouse.com reserves the right to expedite the reprimand process for any users as it is deemed necessary. Any user in the moderation process may be required to review and agree to by email the terms and conditions listed above before their account is re-instated (except for those that are banned).

Firehouse.com reserves the right to edit and/or remove any post or member, at any time, for any reason without notice. Firehouse.com also reserves the right to warn, suspend, and/or ban, any member, at any time, for any reason.

Firehouse.com values the active participation we have in our forums. Please ensure your posts are tasteful and tactful. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
See more
See less

Traffic vests or not?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by BW21 View Post
    Personally....

    If the people on the road driving don't see a giant fire engine with its lights on they probably won't see a vest.
    Anyways....
    The general rule on them is wear them anytime you're working in the road unless doing extrication and its getting in the way or doing any fire suppression... So I'm going to keep wearing mine
    The problem as I see it would be they DO SEE the BRT, and they keep looking at it, without the vest on I might as well be wearing camoflage. The day glow and reflective tape gets there attention to the fact that there were humans that stepped off the BRT and that the BRT does not do the work by itself.
    Be for Peace, but don't be for the Enemy!
    -Big Russ

    Learn from the mistakes of others; you won't live long enough to make them all yourself.

    Originally posted by nyckftbl
    LOL....dont you people have anything else to do besides b*tch about our b*tching?

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Rescue101 View Post
      They "bust" thru a line here,they WILL be in the back of a cruiser,cut and dried. ZERO tolerance for people entering the action zone that aren't Responders. T.C.
      As I recall, they were. But before entering the cruiser, they damaged a FF's vehicle and put several people in danger...
      Opinions my own. Standard disclaimers apply.

      Everyone goes home. Safety begins with you.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Firehouse_Chick View Post
        That is why I am asking questions (this thread).



        I know. It's obvious... I'm only 15. I ate humble pie many posts ago and am asking questions.



        One thing's for sure, when I have repeated things I've learned from my brother, it's near verbatim (not the midwest bash, that was me. Although my grandfather and old ff's from the SOC's in Brooklyn used to say that kind of stuff. but it was usually said regarding just about everybody but their dept. of course, I don't really believe that and I know my brother and his brothers don't).

        My bro's single company goes to more OSW's (occupied structures) than a lot of cities do in a year...or more. He's my hero. What he believes in is not uncommon as can be seen on NYCfirenet or the rant. The safety sally comment is consistent as well as the smooth bore comment.

        Rescue101, any opinion on vests?

        Btw, I really don't want to get off topic Rescue101, but I must mention our trip to Maine last year. we went up to Maine a few yrs ago to Naples, on that big lake there that crosses under a highway. Also went to Poland Maine to visit the operation. I believe those towns aren't too far from you because we went to a Dunkin Donuts which I believe is in your town. After staying in a rent for the weekend cottage on Sebago, we also went to Windham on that busy commercial strip in the middle of what seems to be the country, Moosehead, Kittery Outlets, a big huge bridge off of Portsmouth that goes to Kittery (Piscat something) saw a bunch of neat draw bridges lined up near that bridge. We crossed into Canada in downeast Maine, in I think vassle or vance something, i got that confused, because the GPS said it was quicker to get to Holton that way. I also saw some interesting windmills on a mountain in a town called Mars Hill, that was way way up near canada...it took us a few days to see everything. The cell phone service switched to a canadian svc in that area. we couldn't believe our cell svc was Rogiers or Rogers or something like that. Also, I couldn't believe when we were headed upstate that a few towns are named by crazy numbers like T9384 or something. BIG, BIG state.
        Opinons on vests: We are REQUIRED to wear them.That being said,I've worked in and on the highways of this State for OVER thirty five years WITHOUT the damn things. Vehicle placement and situational awareness will do more to keep you alive than cones and vests. Yes,I think vests are a GOOD idea but the average person who is gonna get you is usually impaired and the vest doesn't do a lick of good there. T.C.

        Comment


        • #49
          Do a search for "Hi Vis Vests" and you will see my .02

          I also posted the "Regulation on Use" and the "Regulation for Manufacturing" the Hi-Vis Vests in a post here.
          "Be LOUD, Be PROUD..... It just might save your can someday when goin' through an intersection!!!!!"

          Life on the Truck (Quint) is good.....

          Eat til you're sleepy..... Sleep til you're hungry..... And repeat.....

          Comment


          • #50
            When I first started out in the fire service, safety traffic vests didn't exist on the engine. It has only been recently that they are a required piece of equipment. They are mainly use on MVA's but if a driver doesn't see a big red fire engine with lights flashing, I highly doubt they will see me or my fellow fire fighters with a reflective vest. But we wear them none the less and hope that those who are out on the road, don't think we are targets of opportunity.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by snowball View Post
              Actually brother, he's telling the truth. No BS.
              I don't doubt he's telling the truth. But it has nothing to do with this.
              Even the burger-flippers at McDonald's probably have some McWackers.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by nmfire View Post
                I don't doubt he's telling the truth. But it has nothing to do with this.
                Noted.....
                IAFF

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by BoxAlarm187 View Post
                  No need for jackassery. My point was that for you to blatantly state that no FF has been denied benefits for not wearing SCBA is pretty presumptuous. If you have proof of this, I'll gladly eat crow. Until then, wear your mask and your vest...small inconveniences for the protection they offer.
                  Show where they have been denied? It isn't any different. Someone killed for not wearing a vest. Someone dies of cancer for not wearing a BA?

                  I'm not being a jackass. All I am saying is that nothing with your benefits would change regardless if you had a vest on or not.

                  I might change my outlook if I saw a previous case where it has. Until then, that is my stance on the subject.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by BKDRAFT View Post
                    Show where they have been denied? It isn't any different. Someone killed for not wearing a vest. Someone dies of cancer for not wearing a BA?

                    I'm not being a jackass. All I am saying is that nothing with your benefits would change regardless if you had a vest on or not.

                    I might change my outlook if I saw a previous case where it has. Until then, that is my stance on the subject.
                    I've read here long enough to formulate a personal opinion....You, snowball, Johnny46, nozzlenut22, Ndemarse, Nyctkbl, ChicagoFF, Massfireguy, 111truck, e211LT aka calmb4storm, feugobuff and a few others are a breath of fresh air!

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Firehouse_Chick View Post
                      I've read here long enough to formulate a personal opinion....You, snowball, Johnny46, nozzlenut22, Ndemarse, Nyctkbl, ChicagoFF, Massfireguy, 111truck, e211LT aka calmb4storm, feugobuff and a few others are a breath of fresh air!
                      111Truck? Are you serious? Just go away please. I'm emailing the WT
                      Matt G.
                      Battalion Chief
                      IACOJ-Member
                      FTM-PTB

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by BKDRAFT View Post
                        Until then, that is my stance on the subject.
                        So your stance is you could care less about anything unless it effects your money?
                        Even the burger-flippers at McDonald's probably have some McWackers.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by nmfire View Post
                          So your stance is you could care less about anything unless it effects your money?
                          Sure is funny how you flip things around.

                          That was the original argument of emt161. I was told benefits will be denied to me if I was killed on a highway without a vest.

                          Show me an incident where that has happened or something similarly has happened.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            I would wear a traffic vest because I think I look pretty damn cool in them. In fact, I'm wearing one right now, sitting in my living room.
                            -Justin J. "JJR512" Rebbert

                            The comments and opinions I express are solely my own and do not necessarily represent those of any employer or volunteer organization with which I am associated. Nobody is responsible for anything I say other than I alone.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              .............edit, its off topic now anyway

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by mtg55 View Post
                                111Truck? Are you serious? Just go away please. I'm emailing the WT
                                The WT should remember 111truck then, aka former FH editor and FDNY retired - Tom Brennan.

                                I'd heard nothing but good things about him and have made sure to read every one of his posts from his old account: 111truck.

                                RIP

                                Comment

                                300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)

                                Collapse

                                Upper 300x250

                                Collapse

                                Taboola

                                Collapse

                                Leader

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X