Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Traffic vests or not?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • gene kidwell
    replied
    safety20

    since it is a fed. DOT law and they dp help when out on the road. the only time we don;t wear a vest is when we have bottle on or working on entrapment. all other times we wear them. it could save your life

    Leave a comment:


  • NEOgreg
    replied
    http://www.respondersafety.com/

    Should have answers for all of the OP's questions...

    Leave a comment:


  • LVFD301
    replied
    I still say its a steamy pile of shi t from Crow..

    Leave a comment:


  • nmfire
    replied
    Originally posted by BKDRAFT View Post
    Sure is funny how you flip things around.
    I didn't flip anything around. You said it. And you're still a fool if you think it is that inconvenient. Maybe you don't give a crap about yourself, but I'm sure others do. I'm sure they'll feel better knowing you were comfortable and proudly protesting the vest laws when you get run over by a car and die.

    Leave a comment:


  • Firehouse_Chick
    replied
    Originally posted by mtg55 View Post
    111Truck? Are you serious? Just go away please. I'm emailing the WT
    The WT should remember 111truck then, aka former FH editor and FDNY retired - Tom Brennan.

    I'd heard nothing but good things about him and have made sure to read every one of his posts from his old account: 111truck.

    RIP

    Leave a comment:


  • Chiampo
    replied
    .............edit, its off topic now anyway

    Leave a comment:


  • JJR512
    replied
    I would wear a traffic vest because I think I look pretty damn cool in them. In fact, I'm wearing one right now, sitting in my living room.

    Leave a comment:


  • BKDRAFT
    replied
    Originally posted by nmfire View Post
    So your stance is you could care less about anything unless it effects your money?
    Sure is funny how you flip things around.

    That was the original argument of emt161. I was told benefits will be denied to me if I was killed on a highway without a vest.

    Show me an incident where that has happened or something similarly has happened.

    Leave a comment:


  • nmfire
    replied
    Originally posted by BKDRAFT View Post
    Until then, that is my stance on the subject.
    So your stance is you could care less about anything unless it effects your money?

    Leave a comment:


  • mtg55
    replied
    Originally posted by Firehouse_Chick View Post
    I've read here long enough to formulate a personal opinion....You, snowball, Johnny46, nozzlenut22, Ndemarse, Nyctkbl, ChicagoFF, Massfireguy, 111truck, e211LT aka calmb4storm, feugobuff and a few others are a breath of fresh air!
    111Truck? Are you serious? Just go away please. I'm emailing the WT

    Leave a comment:


  • Firehouse_Chick
    replied
    Originally posted by BKDRAFT View Post
    Show where they have been denied? It isn't any different. Someone killed for not wearing a vest. Someone dies of cancer for not wearing a BA?

    I'm not being a jackass. All I am saying is that nothing with your benefits would change regardless if you had a vest on or not.

    I might change my outlook if I saw a previous case where it has. Until then, that is my stance on the subject.
    I've read here long enough to formulate a personal opinion....You, snowball, Johnny46, nozzlenut22, Ndemarse, Nyctkbl, ChicagoFF, Massfireguy, 111truck, e211LT aka calmb4storm, feugobuff and a few others are a breath of fresh air!

    Leave a comment:


  • BKDRAFT
    replied
    Originally posted by BoxAlarm187 View Post
    No need for jackassery. My point was that for you to blatantly state that no FF has been denied benefits for not wearing SCBA is pretty presumptuous. If you have proof of this, I'll gladly eat crow. Until then, wear your mask and your vest...small inconveniences for the protection they offer.
    Show where they have been denied? It isn't any different. Someone killed for not wearing a vest. Someone dies of cancer for not wearing a BA?

    I'm not being a jackass. All I am saying is that nothing with your benefits would change regardless if you had a vest on or not.

    I might change my outlook if I saw a previous case where it has. Until then, that is my stance on the subject.

    Leave a comment:


  • snowball
    replied
    Originally posted by nmfire View Post
    I don't doubt he's telling the truth. But it has nothing to do with this.
    Noted.....

    Leave a comment:


  • nmfire
    replied
    Originally posted by snowball View Post
    Actually brother, he's telling the truth. No BS.
    I don't doubt he's telling the truth. But it has nothing to do with this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Leeland
    replied
    When I first started out in the fire service, safety traffic vests didn't exist on the engine. It has only been recently that they are a required piece of equipment. They are mainly use on MVA's but if a driver doesn't see a big red fire engine with lights flashing, I highly doubt they will see me or my fellow fire fighters with a reflective vest. But we wear them none the less and hope that those who are out on the road, don't think we are targets of opportunity.

    Leave a comment:

300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)

Collapse

Upper 300x250

Collapse

Taboola

Collapse

Leader

Collapse
Working...
X