Firehouse.com Forum Rules & Guidelines

Forum Rules & Guidelines

Not Permitted or Tolerated:
• Advertising and/or links of commercial, for-profit websites, products, and/or services is not permitted. If you have a need to advertise on Firehouse.com please contact [email protected]
• Fighting/arguing
• Cyber-bullying
• Swearing
• Name-calling and/or personal attacks
• Spamming
• Typing in all CAPS
• “l33t speak” - Substituting characters for letters in an effort to represent a word or phrase. (example: M*****ive)
• Distribution of another person’s personal information, regardless of whether or not said information is public knowledge and whether or not an individual has permission to post said personal information
• Piracy advocation of any kind
• Racist, sexual, hate type defamatory, religious, political, or sexual commentary.
• Multiple forum accounts

Forum Posting Guidelines:

Posts must be on-topic, non-disruptive and relevant to the firefighting community. Post only in a mature and responsible way that contributes to the discussion at hand. Posting relevant information, helpful suggestions and/or constructive criticism is a great way to contribute to the community.

Post in the correct forum and have clear titles for your threads.

Please post in English or provide a translation.

There are moderators and admins who handle these forums with care, do not resort to self-help, instead please utilize the reporting option. Be mature and responsible for yourself and your posts. If you are offended by another member utilize the reporting option. All reported posts will be addressed and dealt with as deemed appropriate by Firehouse.com staff.

Firehouse.com Moderation Process:
Effective immediately, the following moderation process will take effect. User(s) whose posts are determined by Firehouse.com staff to be in violation of any of the rules above will EARN the following reprimand(s) in the moderation process:
1. An initial warning will be issued.
2. A Final Warning will be issued if a user is found to be in violation a second time.
3. A 3-day suspension will be issued if the user continues to break the forum rules.
4. A 45-day suspension will be issued if the user is found to be a habitual rule breaker.
5. Habitual rule breakers that have exhausted all of the above will receive a permanent life-time ban that will be strictly enforced. Reinstatement will not be allowed – there is no appeal process.

Subsequent accounts created in an effort to side-step the rules and moderation process are subject to automatic removal without notice. Firehouse.com reserves the right to expedite the reprimand process for any users as it is deemed necessary. Any user in the moderation process may be required to review and agree to by email the terms and conditions listed above before their account is re-instated (except for those that are banned).

Firehouse.com reserves the right to edit and/or remove any post or member, at any time, for any reason without notice. Firehouse.com also reserves the right to warn, suspend, and/or ban, any member, at any time, for any reason.

Firehouse.com values the active participation we have in our forums. Please ensure your posts are tasteful and tactful. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
See more
See less

Use of UAC during training

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Use of UAC during training

    I have a hard time believing this topic has not been debated ad nauseaum but searching for it gives me 0 results, so here goes...

    I was trained some years ago that filling cylinders with the UAC is hazardous and should only be done in emergencies. Every manual says this, but it says the same about EBSS while saying you must be trained thoroughly to use it. Manuals also say you’re going to die of heat exhaustion if you wear a turnout coat...

    is transfilling a cylinder during training too risky? Does it put undue stress on the cylinder?

  • #2
    As with any training we do, there is risk.

    When I took RIT class we each had to transfill with the UAC in the classroom. Then had to do it in real-time as part of our final evaluation, filling the manikin's airpack blacked out, and dragging him back through the obstacle course.


    • #3
      Originally posted by nt8d09 View Post
      As with any training we do, there is risk. .
      This is what I’m wondering about. Did you have any knowledge about the risks associated with this? Or did you assume it was cool because you took a class where some instructors didn't think it was a big deal? Im not picking on you I’m just trying to point out that we do what we are shown is ok, and i’m wondering if anyone knows whether or not this is really ok? When i worked at a small department we filled our own cylinders in a big massive class 2 containment unit. The “cascade” system protected the cylinders from being filled too rapidly and the containment unit protected the operator from the frag in the event of a ruptured cylinder. Now I work at a big dept with a bunch of dudes whose knowledge of the refill process includes filling out a form then waiting for the delivery truck to show up. Naturally it does not raise their eyebrows to rapidly fill a cylinder with no protection but I had not thought about that until yesterday. My LT asked to see me do a quick school on the RIC bag, and my entire crew had no idea that there was any hazard associated with using the UAC. Im not getting on a soapbox because I have used it plenty of times in training even knowing how risky it might be, im just wondering if anyone knows anything to either confirm this or knows it to be safer than the scary user manual says


      • #4
        Seems like the one to ask is the manufacture.

        What should be the fill rate or other restrictions they have on filling.

        they will be the ones to get sued, so they should know the answer.


        • #5
          Originally posted by frostymug1001 View Post

          is transfilling a cylinder during training too risky? Does it put undue stress on the cylinder?
          I look at it like this: The manufacturer is the one who I listen too about their product. I believe all of them ( as well as NFPA, OSHA, & NIOSH) advise use only for emergencies. I am not an engineer nor a fiber/metals expert, so I can only guess to the effect on the cylinder, but I shouldn't have to, because the agencies listed prior have people that know and say they feel it's bad. Could they say this to cover their butt for a remote chance of injuring/killing someone? Sure, that's probable, but do you and your department want to assume that liability?


          300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)


          Upper 300x250