Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is this acceptable for explorers?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is this acceptable for explorers?

    Hello. As an explorer for a mid-sized (250,000 people) city...we have an annual meeting where everybody in the program gets together and talks about improvements/new ideas. I'd like to ask if we could get 'issued' SCBAs for training at explorer meetings and for practice at home.

    With that being said, I want to emphasize that I understand that explorers have absolutely no reason to be near an IDLH environment or in an area that requires an SCBA.

    If it is okay with the officer, sometimes we get the opportunity to fight a small grass fire or small car fire. Of course, this is dependent on the officer's judgement of whether the explorer needs to stay inside of the apparatus or can get out and help. In addition, we are allowed to go into a structure after the fire has been put out and air deemed 'safe' to observe and assist with overhaul.

    I've read several threads about explorers and what they can and cannot do. I am by no means, qualified to say anything about those activities (fighting small grass/car fires, and assisting with overhaul).

    I'd like to hear some opinions from the actual firefighters. Does that seem unacceptable? I could see how a car fire or performing overhaul could be more 'dangerous' than fighting a small grass fire. These are activities that our post advisor has told us we are allowed to do (with the officer's okay on it).

    As far as the SCBAs go, we normally train with them every time we meet (4 times a month). We might do a PAT test with them on or maybe a SCBA-maze/confidence course. There are a couple explorer posts around here that issue an SCBA to their explorers so that they are each assigned one (like bunker gear). The explorer brings their SCBA (just like turnout gear) to each meeting and is responsible to maintain it. They're 'required' to don their PPE every day at home just to practice.

    At the same time, there is no need for an explorer to be in an environment where an SCBA is required. However, when we do get the chance to help with overhaul or help on a vehicle fire...I'm always scared as crap about the smoke. Being 17, I'd like to hope I have a future ahead of me. I'd hate to be so into seeing/doing things right now that I get a mouthful of smoke in me. So I guess what I'm trying to ask is that...does it sound like a reasonable idea to issue SCBAs to explorers so that they can elect to use one when they would prefer to do so?

    I've seen some firefighters wear SCBAs when doing overhaul even after the air has been deemed 'safe'...but at the same time...I've seen firefighters not wear SCBAs after the air has been deemed 'safe'. As an explorer, we're obviously not required to go in on anything (such as overhaul)...but what do you think about assigning explorers an SCBA so that they can elect to use it when they feel it would be beneficial to their health?

    Thanks!!

  • #2
    In a word, no. There's little if any justification for "issuing" SCBA to explorers.

    SCBA is expensive and it's not a toy. It's also the sort of thing that minors shouldn't be playing with unsupervised.
    "Nemo Plus Voluptatis Quam Nos Habant"
    sigpic
    The Code is more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules.

    Comment


    • #3
      Negative ghost rider.

      Comment


      • #4
        That's what I was thinking...lol. What about the part about allowing explorers to fight small grass/car fires and do overhaul?

        Is that acceptable? That's why "they" tell us we can do...but I just want to hear from other people.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by jonathan234 View Post
          That's what I was thinking...lol. What about the part about allowing explorers to fight small grass/car fires and do overhaul?

          Is that acceptable? That's why "they" tell us we can do...but I just want to hear from other people.
          I would say no on car fires and overhaul - with car fires you never know what is inside the car, could be HazMat in there, could have pistons for the hood etc "shoot off" (granted all these are rare but it could happen.)

          For overhaul, I would say no as well, never know if there could be a flare up, collapse of a weakened wall, ceiling, etc.

          For a small grass fire, where there is a fire in the mulch or grass in a parking lot or something like that were there isn't much chance for it to spread, then go for it. There is no reason for an explorer to be in an area that could be hazardous.
          Brian Irey

          My comments are mine and mine alone - they do not represent any thoughts or views of my department or anyone else

          Comment


          • #6
            Grass fires? Eh, maybe I guess. The rest? Probably not. It's been said numerous times on these forums; Know and understand your state laws/regulations in reference to these operations. Do to the potential for IDLH I'm willing to bet they say no as well. Grass fires may also be a no no, technically (and this may be a bit overkill) they can be considered "IDLH". I've snuck people around that I trust to do some things they probly shouldn't have as a learning experience, just understand what the consequences could be if something goes wrong...
            Matt G.
            Battalion Chief
            IACOJ-Member
            FTM-PTB

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by mtg55 View Post
              I've snuck people around that I trust to do some things they probly shouldn't have as a learning experience, just understand what the consequences could be if something goes wrong...
              Yes sir. That's what I feel sometimes happens to me. When we are allowed to ride out, we are assigned to a specific station and ride with a specific crew. When we ride out at the same station time after time and get to know the crew, the officer will sometimes let us do things that we might technically not be allowed to do.

              It seems partly like a trust thing.

              Comment


              • #8
                At my department, we are allowed to do the same, if not more of the activities you listed. We also train with SCBAs and gear. HOWEVER, I do not see the need to be "issued" an SCBA to take home. It is not hard to become profficient with an SCBA without using it every day. SCBAs are very expensive and it could be a burden to your department to issue one to every explorer. If you have some just sitting around, that's cool, but you really don't need to be taking them home and risking them getting damaged, stolen, lost, etc. I would agree with you being "issued" an SCBA as long as it was to stay at the station with a lesser chance of anything happening to it.

                Keep up the good work though, don't stop coming up with good ideas, and remember that if there is something you truly believe in, fight for it. Also, great job on the spelling and grammar. It's good to see explorers that respect not only themselves but everyone else that has to read their posts.

                Explorer Assistant Chief Alisha Fern

                Leadership: The ability to guide, direct, and influence others.

                Leadership can be thought of as a capacity to define oneself to others in a way that clarifies and expands a vision of the future.


                [email protected]

                Comment


                • #9
                  scba's

                  Explorers should never be engaged in operations. our explorers respond with us but never get right on the scene. That being said - we train our explorers and make sure thay have a pack on all calls - in the event conditions change and the atmosphere becomes unsafe.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    There is absolutely no reason to be issued SCBA. Using them for training is one thing, but other than that, absolutely not.
                    ------------------------------------
                    These opinions are mine and do not reflect the opinions of any organizations I am affiliated with.
                    ------------------------------------

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Food for thought on the grass fires. I can't remember the exact figure on this, but a goodly percentage of all US wildlands firefighter fatalities have occurred in light flashy fuels, or during lulls in fire activity. If you don't believe me. The Mann Gulch Fire of 1949 is a prime example of this. 13 people including 12 smoke jumpers died in a grass fire in remote Montana. Norman MacLean wrote about the fire in his book "Young Men and Fire".

                      I don't really think explorers should be helping with overhaul or car fires. My philosophy with car fires is if you are close enough to spray water on the vehicle you should be packed up until it has stopped smoking and you could theoretically touch any part of the vehicle with your bare skin without being burned. With overhaul you are trying to find the red stuff so you can cover it with the wet stuff and anytime you've got the red stuff in a "confined space" you need to be wearing an air pack. My only exception is to my personal rule about overhaul is during overhaul of an uninsulated wooden structure that you can absolutely verify there weren't any hazardous materials (wooden graineries or hay barns) and I have to be able to adequately ventilate it with a positive pressure ventilation fan. If the fan can't provide adequate ventilation, then SCBAs will still get used. I also don't think explorers should be forming wildlands handcrews like they do on the west coast, but there is nothing wrong with explorers learning basic firefighting skills by extinguishing a low risk mulch, brush, or single tree fire like one poster mentioned.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I am currently an explorer so don't put too much weight to my opinion but, I have been in on quite a few overhauls and have put water on a few small grass fires. Our post is cleared to do overhaul when the structure has been declared a non-IDLH. And most of our explorers are able to do anything that doesn't require a pack and a mask. As to explorers being issued personal masks...no way. The fewer opportunities to get in trouble the better. Having personal masks makes it way too easy to get in trouble. Just my ideas and experiences.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Explorer Asst Chief Fern View Post
                          At my department, we are allowed to do the same, if not more of the activities you listed. We also train with SCBAs and gear. HOWEVER, I do not see the need to be "issued" an SCBA to take home. It is not hard to become profficient with an SCBA without using it every day. SCBAs are very expensive and it could be a burden to your department to issue one to every explorer. If you have some just sitting around, that's cool, but you really don't need to be taking them home and risking them getting damaged, stolen, lost, etc. I would agree with you being "issued" an SCBA as long as it was to stay at the station with a lesser chance of anything happening to it.

                          Keep up the good work though, don't stop coming up with good ideas, and remember that if there is something you truly believe in, fight for it. Also, great job on the spelling and grammar. It's good to see explorers that respect not only themselves but everyone else that has to read their posts.

                          Agreed about 99.5%.

                          I don't see any reason that an explorer should be issued an SCBA. For our department, if we are having a training where SCBA is going to be needed we'll grab what we need off of our third out engine, so as not to disrupt crews if there was to be a call. Even if one were to be assigned, and I'm "overruled" by a majority, it shouldn't be taken home.

                          As for your other points/questions:
                          All of those seem quite risky for an explorer to take part in. Of course, there are too many "what-ifs" involved, and that's why it should be up to the IC.

                          However, car fires (I would say) would be the one thing that should be a no-no to all explorers. Chances are there (while slim) that pistons could fly off, bumpers go off, even airbags... Not to mention traffic if it's actually on a road and not in a parking lot.

                          I would think that there is some sort of policy with your post about what they can and can't do, every post will be different depending on insurance... But the Boy Scouts/Learning for Life would have a fit if they knew an explorer was put in "Danger"...
                          Mike Kelly
                          Altoona Fire Department
                          Explorer Post 800
                          Altoona, Wisconsin

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Our Explorers work with SCBA, and are required to throw it in 1 minute or less. SCBA is used for simulated smoke conditions, basement search drills, firefighter survival drills and forcible entry/exit drills. I see no need to take them home.....there is no need for line personnel to take them.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I'd have to say no to getting one "issued" to you. SCBA's are quite expensive, and you have to look at it from a department point of view, WHAT IF something happened to it? (damaged,lost,stolen,etc.) Training with them at the fire house if perfectly fine. My department tries to get the juniors as much experience as possible with tools, PPE, and SCBA's so when it comes time for them to go through the state training, they have an idea of what to do and what to expect.
                              "If it was easy, someone else would of done it already." - Lt. Ray McCormack FDNY

                              - Firefighter 1 / HAZMAT Ops / EMT-B

                              Comment

                              300x600 Ad Unit (In-View)

                              Collapse

                              Upper 300x250

                              Collapse

                              Taboola

                              Collapse

                              Leader

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X