A career friend of mine from another state called we were discussing a problem that arose after a structure fire. Let me see if I can lay it out like he talked so bare with me.
After the structure fire a company officer asked for a shift meeting with the shift commander, ast. chief and the chief. In the meeting the company officer proceeded to call out the ast. chief in issues he saw wrong from his point of view. From what my friend said the company officer feels that the ast chief who according to the chief on a normal day his duties are mainly safety on the fire ground tends to freelance. He used the guys from his station to help keep the energy up in the attack. The company officer never once stated anything that he did incorrectly. The chief tried to defuse the situation rather than call an end to the meeting with the shift.
I hope I got that like my friend laid it out on the phone.
The questions are,
How should the company officer have handled the situation?
How should the chief have handled the situation?
After the structure fire a company officer asked for a shift meeting with the shift commander, ast. chief and the chief. In the meeting the company officer proceeded to call out the ast. chief in issues he saw wrong from his point of view. From what my friend said the company officer feels that the ast chief who according to the chief on a normal day his duties are mainly safety on the fire ground tends to freelance. He used the guys from his station to help keep the energy up in the attack. The company officer never once stated anything that he did incorrectly. The chief tried to defuse the situation rather than call an end to the meeting with the shift.
I hope I got that like my friend laid it out on the phone.
The questions are,
How should the company officer have handled the situation?
How should the chief have handled the situation?
Comment