PDA

View Full Version : Long Awaited Lohan Photo Shoot


MarcusKspn
02-20-2008, 04:32 PM
How this didn't get on here sooner I will never understand :D .
------------------------------------------------------------
From New York Magazine:

In 1962, photographer Bert Stern shot a series of photos of Marilyn Monroe that have collectively come to be known as “The Last Sitting.” Taken during several boozy sessions at the Hotel Bel-Air, the photographs are arguably the most famous images ever captured of America’s most famous actress: Monroe, sleepy-eyed and naked, sips from a Champagne glass, enacts a fan dance of sorts with various diaphanous scarves, romps with erotic playfulness on a bed of white linens. Six weeks after she had posed, Monroe was found dead of an apparent barbiturate overdose.

The photos endure partly as artifacts—as the last visible evidence of the living woman (a legacy reinforced by Stern’s decision to publish the contact sheets Monroe herself had crossed out in red marker). But the pictures are also remarkable for the raw truths they seem to reveal. In them, we see an actress whose comedic talents were overshadowed by her sex appeal, a woman who is cannily aware of her pinup status, yet is also beginning to show her 36 years. In many shots, she is obviously drunk. This was an unhappy time for Monroe. Notorious for her on-set antics, she had been publicly lambasted by Billy Wilder after Some Like It Hot, then fired from the production of Something’s Got to Give; she’d endured two recent divorces and, in 1961, a brief stint in a psychiatric ward.



Stern excavated and preserved the poignant humanity of the real woman—beautiful, but also fragile, needy, flawed—from the monumental sex symbol. In our armored, airbrushed age, his achievement feels almost revolutionary.



Forty-six years later, Stern has revisited his classic shots with Lindsay Lohan, another actress whose prodigious fame is not quite commensurate with her professional achievements. Stern, who shot the photos on film rather than digitally, told me he was interested in Lohan because he suspected “she had a lot more depth to her” than one might assume from “those teenage movies.” Indeed, many in the film industry believe that Lohan has yet to pursue projects equal to her gifts. Without putting too fine a point on it, you might say Lohan has, like Monroe, a knack for courting the tabloids and tripping up her career. (Readers will remember that Lohan had her own Billy Wilder moment two summers ago on the set of Georgia Rule.) Stern said the project also grew out of his interest in “controversial women,” or “bad girls,” like “Britney, Paris, and Lindsay.” Monroe was, in a sense, the original tabloid queen.



Though Lohan’s willingness to reprise the photos might seem a sly nod to her scandalous past, the actress offered a straightforward explanation. “I didn’t have to put much thought into it. I mean, Bert Stern? Doing a Marilyn shoot? When is that ever going to come up? It’s really an honor.” During a break in the daylong shoot, Lohan sat cross-legged on a bed in the four-room suite and spoke to me, in that familiar throaty voice with its staccato rhythms, about her abiding obsession with Monroe. Her interest took root a decade ago with multiple viewings of Niagara during the London filming of The Parent Trap. She has even purchased an apartment where Marilyn once lived. “If you saw my house … I have a lot of Marilyn stuff,” she told me, including a huge painting of Monroe.



“It’s eerie,” Lohan said of the painting, a Christmas gift, “because it’s this picture of her, and it’s kind of cartoony, and there’s a big bottle of pills next to her, and they’ve fallen over.” Lohan called Monroe’s suicide “tragic,” and then added, elliptically, “You know, it’s also tragic what just recently happened to someone else.” I asked whether she was referring to Heath Ledger. She nodded: “They are both prime examples of what this industry can do to someone.” Why some and not others, I asked, since it has often seemed that the thrice-rehabbed Lohan might meet a similar fate. Lohan replied with a flicker of annoyance: “I don’t know. I’m not them. But I sure as hell wouldn’t let it happen to me.” Still, one wonders whether Lohan’s participation in this project, given all the spooky parallels, isn’t the photographic equivalent of moving into a haunted house. (Which, in fact, she may have already done.)



Lohan viewed the shoot as a theatrical performance, as a chance to inhabit the role of an idol. “I wanted to portray the book and get it point-on as much as I could, to bring it back to life,” she said. Hence the strict mimesis: scarves, nudity, and all. “Not more than fifteen minutes had passed since she’d arrived, and already she had agreed to take her clothes off!” Stern writes of Monroe in his swaggering introduction to The Complete Last Sitting, the book in which all 2,571 photos have been collected. He might have said the same about Lohan. “I was comfortable with it,” the actress remarked of the nudity (though she did confess to doing “250 crunches” the previous night). All made up, in winged eyeliner and shellacked blonde wig, Lohan, who has returned to her former voluptuousness, at times appeared more Marilyn than the thin, somewhat diminished woman of the original Marilyn photos. “It was very similar, déjà vu you might say, like revisiting an old street,” said Stern.



The original photos, however, were distinguished by an almost claustrophobic intimacy between photographer and muse. In the first session, Stern persuaded the entourage of stylists to leave him alone with Monroe. The shoot thus took on the symbolic (if not the actual) contours of a liaison. The rise of the celebrity industrial complex has rendered this sort of tense pas de deux all but impossible. At the Lohan shoot, the crowd included Lohan’s manager, her security guard, and her younger sister, Ali; a makeup artist and assistant, a hairstylist and assistant, a stylist, a manicurist, a sentry to watch the borrowed diamonds; Stern, his manager, and two photo assistants. Lohan and Stern worked in an adjoining room, while the rest of us hovered outside like groupies at a backstage entrance.


“Here is a woman who is giving herself to the public,” Lohan said, about the Monroe photos, when we spoke the next day by phone. “She’s saying, ‘Look, you’ve taken a lot from me, so why don’t I give it to you myself.’ She’s taking control back.” Like any tabloid veteran, Lohan understands the potency of a photograph, and that the best way to respond to a society that views you only as an image might just be on its own terms.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

And of course you have to have the pics (http://media.nymag.com/fashion/08/spring/44247/). (Family Mag, but Adult Content, enter at own risk)

You understand of course that I had to post the whole article before I posted the pic, because we all know that we read the articles.

Steamer
02-20-2008, 05:20 PM
What article?? :D

MassFireGuy
02-20-2008, 05:22 PM
AWESOME! What a great_________.

lutan1
02-20-2008, 07:06 PM
Nice eye candy...

She's not that hard to look at!

JHR1985
02-20-2008, 08:07 PM
I've seen em and what a waste of my time.

FDAIC485
02-20-2008, 08:13 PM
Do you think there will be Madden-like curse with that one?

snowball
02-20-2008, 08:46 PM
She's all grown up now.

CALFFBOU
02-20-2008, 11:39 PM
Interesting repeat of history.

Geinandputitout
02-20-2008, 11:41 PM
Nice feet.

Hexxus
02-20-2008, 11:59 PM
Her body is nasty looking.

JHR1985
02-21-2008, 12:22 AM
the old Lohan with red hair, a little thickness and huge hooties was a lot hotter... in my opinon.

Granted, she isnt bad looking now...

but, just not my cup of tea

ffbam24
02-21-2008, 12:25 AM
Blech!
Could she have looked more gorked out?
Was she thinking when the voice inside her head said, "Hey Lilo, you're fresh out of rehab, this is a good idea!"?

Raughammer1
02-21-2008, 01:51 AM
Porno...just what we need on the front of "for public consumption" magazines.
This is not Playboy, but the New Yorker.

Sorry, to each his own, more power to you. Personally i dont think "nudes" should be on the cover of "non-adult" magazines.

There is a reason "most families" keep Playboy and what not away from kids...now they have to add The New Yorker to the list of magazines to keep from the kids as well. So what are they going to do next to "shock" the public so they can claim to be a cutting edge rag?



*shrug* To each his own i suppose.

scfire86
02-21-2008, 01:57 AM
Long awaited by who?

CaptainGonzo
02-21-2008, 07:58 AM
Porno...just what we need on the front of "for public consumption" magazines.
This is not Playboy, but the New Yorker.

Sorry, to each his own, more power to you. Personally i dont think "nudes" should be on the cover of "non-adult" magazines.

There is a reason "most families" keep Playboy and what not away from kids...now they have to add The New Yorker to the list of magazines to keep from the kids as well. So what are they going to do next to "shock" the public so they can claim to be a cutting edge rag?



*shrug* To each his own i suppose.

That's hardly pornography...

posted by CALFFBOU
Interesting repeat of history.

On many levels, yes.

FDAIC485
02-21-2008, 08:15 AM
All I see are freckles

ChiefKN
02-21-2008, 04:36 PM
Long awaited by who?

I'll second that... did someone attack her with a sharpie pen?

AZFF25
02-21-2008, 05:04 PM
Lindsay Lohan=SKANK

Raughammer1
02-22-2008, 12:39 AM
That's hardly pornography...


Thats your opinion....

On ABC, FOX and CNN when they showed the magazine cover during the news they blotted or pixeled her naked butt out. (Perhaps "blurred" would have been a better descriptor?)

You may not have considered it porno, but many if not all major news outlets thought it was close enough to porno to blot it out.

Like i said: "To each his own."
Personally i dont think nudes should be on "just any" magazine cover.

Regardless, i find myself agreeing with AZFF25.

lutan1
02-22-2008, 03:31 AM
So all you knockers out there are saying that if she was in your bedroom getting undressed, you'd look the other way???:cool:

Yeah right....:rolleyes:

Raughammer1
02-22-2008, 04:19 AM
So all you knockers out there are saying that if she was in your bedroom getting undressed, you'd look the other way???:cool:

Yeah right....:rolleyes:

*grin*

Lutan, I'm a married man, if she was in my bedroom and then proceded to disrobe i would be callin' the police to get her out of there.

"Look the other way"? LOL, i would be RUNNING the other way.

Then again i dont expect any young starlets to show up in my bedroom for a disrobing session anytime soon. They would have to get past a little redhead gal who would not cotton to such an idea.

resQengine
02-22-2008, 04:19 AM
And of course you have to have the pics (http://media.nymag.com/fashion/08/spring/44247/). (Family Mag, but Adult Content, enter at own risk)

Im trying to commpute the risk vs. benefit analysis here. It says adult content. Since Im at work, this could be a significant risk. But it says its from Family Mag, which does not sound too risky. The benefit though, well I agree with AZFF25, which I just can't see the benefit. I think I have made my decision now.

I guess I can only imagine what they must look like.

lutan1
02-22-2008, 06:07 AM
*grin*

Lutan, I'm a married man, if she was in my bedroom and then proceded to disrobe i would be callin' the police to get her out of there.

"Look the other way"? LOL, i would be RUNNING the other way.

Then again i dont expect any young starlets to show up in my bedroom for a disrobing session anytime soon. They would have to get past a little redhead gal who would not cotton to such an idea.

Dude! You're married- not dead! You can look...:D

BULL321
02-22-2008, 06:58 AM
She looks like SH*T. I've seen better, alot better. Not the best decision to make after getting out of rehab. Say no to crack! She looks like a truck stop whore, the ones that will F*ck for tokens instead of dollars. I've seen better tits in a National Geographic. Her tits look like a slinky that done been slung. Like party balloons, you know the one that a clown can tie up in the shape of a giraffe. HAHAHAHAHAH!

DaSharkie
02-22-2008, 07:01 AM
So all you knockers out there are saying that if she was in your bedroom getting undressed, you'd look the other way???:cool:

Yeah right....:rolleyes:

Actaully, yes. You take all of these supposed "Hollywood Hotties" and "Supermodels" then strip down the makeup, airburshing, lighting, and little things they do to make these phots and "starlets" look "good" and they look like a common person walking down the street - sometimes even your common nightwalker.

Personally, my wife looks better, and probably has more intelligence in here pinky nail than most of these people.

Yeah, I'll turn the other way. Gladly.

resQengine
02-22-2008, 07:54 AM
Yeah, I'll turn the other way. Gladly.

Sounds like I didnt miss much...which is exactly what I expected.

Thanks for saving me a few minutes.

MarcusKspn
02-22-2008, 04:52 PM
It was only a matter of time before she took her clothes off for money. I'm not really surprised that she got naked. But I am surprised that it wasn't for Playboy, or some homemade video.

doughesson
02-22-2008, 04:55 PM
So all you knockers out there are saying that if she was in your bedroom getting undressed, you'd look the other way???:cool:

Yeah right....:rolleyes:


Well,the only reason I ever sat through her "Herbie" movie was to see Jeff Gordon getting passed by a girl in a '67 beater.How life imitates art!

N2DFire
02-22-2008, 05:34 PM
It was only a matter of time before she took her clothes off for money. I'm not really surprised that she got naked. But I am surprised that it wasn't for Playboy, or some homemade video.

Just wait - it ain't over yet. I'm sure she'll show up in at least one (if not both) of those venues before too long.

CALFFBOU
02-23-2008, 03:51 AM
PM me for the full link.

doughesson
02-23-2008, 01:27 PM
If she'd taken better care of them,they wouldn't be down where they are now.Right now,I'd have to down a six or two to think she was worth it.
As Ron White says"Okay,you can roll em back up now." and "Things that make you go...bleh!"

She looks like SH*T. I've seen better, alot better. Not the best decision to make after getting out of rehab. Say no to crack! She looks like a truck stop whore, the ones that will F*ck for tokens instead of dollars. I've seen better tits in a National Geographic. Her tits look like a slinky that done been slung. Like party balloons, you know the one that a clown can tie up in the shape of a giraffe. HAHAHAHAHAH!

MaryJane69
02-25-2008, 09:15 AM
Mmm. I've seen better, too. She's not bad looking (apart from the close up of her freckles!) But I have seen better.
Porn? Are you kidding?! It's page three stuff, hardly porn is it? Come on!

EastKyFF
02-25-2008, 11:01 AM
Careful, boys!! Machine-gun jumblies!

SPFDRum
02-25-2008, 11:43 AM
I could have waited...but then again, I wouldn't rush to kick her out of bed for eating crackers!:D
Hmm, fembots, as soon as they are invented, I am going to be a happy camper.

Geinandputitout
02-25-2008, 11:47 AM
Just to clarify she is not in The New Yorker magazine, I got my most recent edition and checked :).

It is an entirely separate publication.

MassFireGuy
02-25-2008, 12:08 PM
I do not think I would have a problem if she got naked in my room. But then again, I think she is good looking.

CALFFBOU
02-25-2008, 12:26 PM
Have you guys seen all of the pictures? They are pretty nice.

MassFireGuy
02-25-2008, 01:49 PM
Bou,
Link to the full page?

Dickey
02-28-2008, 04:06 AM
Dude! You're married- not dead! You can look...:D

I'm not dead and certainly not married so as soon as the restraining order runs out, I can touch too!!:D Hell yeah I'd tap that, tap it twice even. I'd give her the best 5 min of her life. The last 3 or so we can just cuddle and talk and stuff!:D



I think it's a matter of time before she ends up on a home porn video or in the pages of some skank mag. It won't be Playboy though, they only publish pictures of bleach blondes with rubber boobs.

Resq1scnd2none
02-28-2008, 09:33 AM
She looks like a bad hose load.....you know....

Humped hard and put away dirty and wet!

lutan1
02-28-2008, 03:48 PM
I'm not dead and certainly not married so as soon as the restraining order runs out, I can touch too!!:D Hell yeah I'd tap that, tap it twice even. I'd give her the best 5 min of her life. The last 3 or so we can just cuddle and talk and stuff!:D


I just spat my morning coffee all over the keyboard reading that!!!!:D