PDA

View Full Version : Unreal!


MattyJ
03-30-2005, 03:24 PM
The NYC City Council is attempting to pass a new law. They want to establish two lists for firefighter canidates from the same test. One would be the Top 50% of test scores, the other would be the BOTTOM 50% of test scores. And you guessed it,....they can hire future FDNY firefighters off EITHER list. Check out the NYC web site and look under City Council, Public Saftey Purposals.

BFDNJFF
03-30-2005, 03:32 PM
i dont c how this is unreal in my opinion those entrance exams are all stupid , just because a man isnt any good at a test doesnt make him any less of a fireman !!

hell i scored a 92 on that test and i will never get called and just cause some book jockey scores a 98 i guess he is a better fireman .:rolleyes:

fireguy919
03-30-2005, 03:36 PM
Keep all the book smart people. I want street smart people.

Bones42
03-30-2005, 03:44 PM
Might just be me, but I'd rather have the best of the best, all around.

BC79er
03-30-2005, 04:16 PM
And considering you're going to be taking all sorts of tests from books in the academy, if you can't do well on the entrance one, you're not going to make it out of the academy either. Some folks are bad at taking tests and study their a$$es off for it to score high. It's called taking initiative.

Doesn't make their proposal any better, it's still stupid. Wonder what nimrod came up with that as being a good idea.

sbfdco1
03-30-2005, 04:17 PM
MattyJ,

Any chance you can post either the site or the article. I can seem to find it.

IMHO - I thinks it's a great idea. Why should someone with military time, residency credit get in before someone who doesn't qualify for the same "perks". I took the test, no residency, no military, I got a couple wrong on the written, aced the physical. From what I understand, with regards to the list that is active now, canditates w/no perks who scored 100/100; their list numbers are starting out in the 2000 range!

Might just be me, but I'd rather have the best of the best, all around.

Bones ...

What's you definition of the best? I have two college degrees, got a couple questions wrong, I think I'd make a pretty damn good fireman.

Just my MHO though.

Bones42
03-30-2005, 04:25 PM
Highest test scores. And then highest scores in physical testing.

A guy with 2 college degrees and zero questions wrong. ;)

Remember, when someone goes to the FDNY academy, prior experience means 0. You are there to learn their way of doing things, not how to improve what you already know, not how to adapt what you know. A guy with 15 years experience is the same as a guy with 15 weeks experience.


Why should someone with military time, residency credit get in before someone who doesn't quilify for the same perks I agree with you on this.

sbfdco1
03-30-2005, 04:39 PM
Originally posted by Bones42
Highest test scores. And then highest scores in physical testing.


It takes more than scoring well on a written exam, same for the physical. You want a candidate that is focused, disciplined, respectful, can follow orders. If I aced every exam I took in college, well I’d probably be a brain surgeon. This new legislation gives two candidates a better opportunity to get on FDNY. Take the last FDNY list for example, the city exhausted the previous list, are you tell me that the guys in the first third are going to make a better fireman that the second third, I don’t by it.

:)

Dalmatian90
03-30-2005, 04:41 PM
I thinks it's a great idea. Why should someone with military time, residency credit get in before someone who doesn't qualify for the same "perks".

It's not like the "rules of the game" are secret.

Want the extra points? Join the military for a few years, then move to the city.

I really don't have a problem with Cities having bonus categories -- whether they're prior military service or college credits beyond the minimum requirements, or even requiring residency.

It's their money and if they want to give extra consideration to people who live there, fine!

But leave things fair and don't start up shenanigans like top 50/bottom 50 lists.

For large departments, I can't even begin to imagine how you would operate recruiting without civil service exams. It would immediately devolve into a who-do-you-know and who-got-the-scotch system -- too few openings, too many applicants. And if you think you have a remote chance now with test scores, you'd have no chance without them unless you knew somebody.

MattyJ
03-30-2005, 05:01 PM
As far as the extrs-credit points...who do you think came up with them?? The city. The "exhausted list". I can tell you, it often shows in some of the new guys.
The FDNY test is basic reading, and commen sense. So I wouldnt call them "Book smart" just because they scored high on the written. Its more like, basic high school education, and commen sense. Alot of it is how serious you take it. Not rushing, double checking answers, re-reading the questions, checking all the possible answers. The physical is not tough. Pretty much average shape, and very firefighting specific. If you fail 2 out of, I think 6 or 7 events, you'd be on the bottom part of the list.
So lets see. Id rather keep it like it is. A VERY fair system that nets you "Book Smart, "Street smart" physically fit canidates.

CaptainGonzo
03-30-2005, 05:05 PM
That idea is....



NI( ! )NE

ullrichk
03-30-2005, 06:56 PM
Originally posted by CaptainGonzo
That idea is....



NI( ! )NE



Vey well stated!

(Who wants to find out that the guys on the bottom 50% are being sent when your a$$ is on the line?!?)

len1582
03-30-2005, 10:12 PM
When it's time to take a promotional test and some of the "bottom half" don't score well and don't get promoted, you can bet anything they'll raise hell about that test being unfair too. If a person won't put the time into studying,or getting into shape for the physical, for a job or promotion they shouldn't gripe about not being at the top.

FORTff
03-30-2005, 11:33 PM
The entire proposal is a load of crap. NYC has the absolute most fair hiring practices I've seen of any fire department. Hell, it's not even the fire department who does the hiring. It's a matter of who applies, if minorities don't apply to take the exam or apply themselves to do better, they won't!!! That's it. This entire proposal is wrapped around trying to increase minorities. It won't work unless they sign up to take the test. The city handed out plenty of free applications when everyone else had to pay $25 to take the exam and spent over a million dollars on a recruitment campaign aimed at minorities and women....not necesarily the best firefighters.

If you all feel that you'd rather have the less "booksmart" fireman and the better one overall, how exactly do you propose to hire these people? How do you rate them, how do you test them? The current tests are very job related and easy for ANYONE coming in right off the street to do without a problem. The written is easily done for anyone who has a brain that isn't burned out, and went to high school, and the physical agility test is idiot proof and extremely job related. This new procedure is an absolute joke.


Int. No. 588



By Council Members Clarke, Barron, Comrie, Foster, Gerson, Gonzalez, James, Monserrate, Palma, Perkins, Recchia Jr., Seabrook, Stewart, Vann and Weprin



..Title

A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in relation to reforming the ranking procedure for the open competitive firefighter exam.

..Body



Be it enacted by the Council as follows:

Section 1. Declaration of legislative findings and intent. Minority and female recruitment has been a perennial problem for the Fire Department: of the uniformed members of the Department, 91.6% are Caucasian; of over 8,700 members, only 28 are women. In contrast, 65% of New York City residents are minorities and 50% are women.

The open competitive firefighter exam enables the Fire Department to identify people who have the necessary strength and intelligence to become firefighters. However, beyond identifying candidates who can meet these thresholds, the hiring process does a poor job of distinguishing among the candidates, to the detriment of minorities and women.

Candidates for the position of firefighter are invited to the Fire Academy in the order of their rank on the FDNY hiring list, which is determined by combining scores on the written and physical exams, and then adding on any bonus points. Up to 25 points can be added to a candidate’s raw exam scores: 5 points for residents of New York City; 5 points for veterans; 5 points for offspring of members of the city’s uniformed agencies who died in the line of duty; and 10 points for siblings of firefighters or police officers who died in the line of duty during the World Trade Center attack.

In order to be placed on the FDNY’s hiring list, candidates must achieve passing scores on both a written SAT-like exam and a physical exam. The passing grade on the 1999 written exam was 85%, and on the physical exam a candidate cannot fail more than two of eight tasks. These thresholds ensure that any candidate placed on the FDNY’s hiring list meets necessary intelligence and strength criteria. Indeed, the list established from the 1999 written exam was exhausted, meaning every passing candidate who cleared background checks was eventually offered a position in the Fire Academy. Presumably all these candidates were qualified to become firefighters or they would not have been offered a place in the Fire Academy.

Relative ranking on the FDNY’s hiring list, however, does not accurately reflect differences in firefighting ability. First, the existence of up to 25 bonus points that, with the exception of points for veterans, though laudable, appear to have no bearing on qualities relating to firefighting, makes it difficult to believe that placement on the civil service list fully reflects merit and fitness. Second, the written exam tests certain important qualities, such as visual-spatial skills and reading comprehension, but cannot and does not test many of the characteristics that make a good firefighter. In addition to physical strength and intelligence, firefighters should possess bravery, quick thinking, common sense, leadership skills, and ability to function well under pressure, to follow orders and work in a quasi-military structure, and to work well in a team.

As a result, one cannot say with any degree of confidence that someone with a total score of 99, and ranked at the top of the FDNY’s hiring list, would be a better firefighter than someone with a total score of 89, who may be too low on the list to ever be hired. The person with the higher score, for example, may have received 10 bonus points for being the sibling of a police officer who died on September 11, 2001. Alternatively, the difference in scores could entirely reflect differences on the written exam, which, as just discussed, is more of a test of general intelligence than firefighting ability. Moreover, in the context of the 1999 written exam, the candidate with a lower score still would have passed the exam with a minimum score of 85%.

That factors other than firefighting ability influence the ordering of a list of qualified firefighter candidates is not problematic in of itself. Since all candidates on the hiring list meet criteria the FDNY has established, they are all capable of becoming effective firefighters. The ranking is problematic, however, because minorities and women tend to be lower on the list. As a result, it typically takes longer for minorities and women to be invited to the Fire Academy, increasing the chances that they will have begun alternative careers or otherwise have lost interest in becoming firefighters. In addition, since the hiring list is often not exhausted, well-qualified minorities and women on the list may never be called to the Fire Academy.

The Council finds that the current civil service ranking of firefighter candidates does not fully reflect merit and fitness, and leads to the hiring of fewer minorities and women. Accordingly, the Council declares that it is reasonable and necessary to reform the ranking procedure for the open competitive firefighter exam.

§2. Chapter one of title 15 of the administrative code of the city of New York is amended by adding a new section 15-129 to read as follows:

15-129 Ranking of firefighter candidates. Firefighter candidates from the open competitive firefighter exam shall be ranked on the eligible to hire list in two zones, the high zone and the low zone. The high zone shall encompass the top scoring fifty percent of candidates who successfully pass the firefighter written and physical exams. The low zone shall encompass the bottom scoring fifty percent of candidates who successfully pass the firefighter written and physical exams. Within each zone, the department shall randomly order the candidates.

§3. This local law shall take effect 90 days after its enactment into law.

CALFFBOU
03-30-2005, 11:44 PM
Originally posted by fireguy919
Keep all the book smart people. I want street smart people.

I would pass on the above statement because you can give
a book guy street smarts in the field. But a street guy
is already set in his ways and picking up the second
master would be more difficult.

RESERVE172
03-31-2005, 01:09 AM
Originally posted by FORTff
The entire proposal is a load of crap. NYC has the absolute most fair hiring practices I've seen of any fire department. Hell, it's not even the fire department who does the hiring. It's a matter of who applies, if minorities don't apply to take the exam or apply themselves to do better, they won't!!! That's it. This entire proposal is wrapped around trying to increase minorities. It won't work unless they sign up to take the test. The city handed out plenty of free applications when everyone else had to pay $25 to take the exam and spent over a million dollars on a recruitment campaign aimed at minorities and women....not necesarily the best firefighters.

By Council Members Clarke, Barron, Comrie, Foster, Gerson, Gonzalez, James, Monserrate, Palma, Perkins, Recchia Jr., Seabrook, Stewart, Vann and Weprin
THIS LIST IS FOR THE WALL OF SHAME!

Section 1. Declaration of legislative findings and intent. Minority and female recruitment has been a perennial problem for the Fire Department: of the uniformed members of the Department, 91.6% are Caucasian; of over 8,700 members, only 28 are women. In contrast, 65% of New York City residents are minorities and 50% are women.
BUT 100% OF THE UNIFORMED FIREFIGHTERS ARE THE BEST!


Indeed, the list established from the 1999 written exam was exhausted, meaning every passing candidate who cleared background checks was eventually offered a position in the Fire Academy. Presumably all these candidates were qualified to become firefighters or they would not have been offered a place in the Fire Academy.
INDEED!!!- MAYBE THE BACKGROUND CHECK AFFECTED 100% OF THE 65%!

The ranking is problematic, however, because minorities and women tend to be lower on the list. As a result, it typically takes longer for minorities and women to be invited to the Fire Academy, increasing the chances that they will have begun alternative careers or otherwise have lost interest in becoming firefighters.
LOST INTEREST? ALTERNATIVE CAREERS? DO WHAT I DID AND QUIT THE ALTERNATE CAREER WHEN YOU GET ON! SOUNDS TO ME LIKE THESE LOW SCORING CANDIDATES AREN'T VERY INTERESTED TO BEGIN WITH!!!:eek:

CaptainS
03-31-2005, 11:36 AM
Great, That means I dont have to study, use my veternas credits, not live in the city and still get hired, am I following the logic right?

Dont get me wrong some people dont test well and still can do a good job but in my opinion if you want the job you should work for it and be hired on that merit, not just take the test and say "hey I dont have to work on this, I can still get hired with out trying" what kind of message does this send.

"You cant make this s88t up"

t13one12
03-31-2005, 04:50 PM
So basically for those who support this new system, if a person taking the test feels they aren't doing well, they should tank it and hope to be at the top of the lower 50% rather than the bottom of the upper 50%? Seems to me you want to reward the people who don't do well and take away from those who score well. Sure makes a lot of sense....(Sarcasm)

Does the current system suck? Yeah it does. There are too many people taking these tests for everyone to get hired. Its a reality. Deal with it. I plan on taking the 2006 exam, and am currently studying for my bachelors in business because I know that there is a good chance that if I am not perfect on both tests, I won't get hired. It's not like mom and dad used to say when you were a kid, you CAN'T be anything you want to. There will be restrictions. Should that stop you from trying? HELL NO. But you need to face the reality that everyone fails things in life, hopefully this won't be the place you fail.

With that said, I'm sure I will take a lot of flack for this comment, so bring it on. I wish you all luck for those on the list and those planning to take it. It sucks we can't all be what we want to be, but its reality.

MattyJ
03-31-2005, 04:50 PM
I saw this purposal on a different FDNY Broard: Next election we should put into office those who got the least amount of votes. That would be fair according to this logic. If they really believe in the policy.

jdl123
03-31-2005, 05:00 PM
A bit off topic, but wonderin' if NYC still has age limits to test? I think it is/was you couldn't be older than 35 to test. Couldn't find this info on that website.

stillPSFB
04-01-2005, 09:39 AM
Originally posted by t13one12
So basically for those who support this new system, if a person taking the test feels they aren't doing well, they should tank it and hope to be at the top of the lower 50% rather than the bottom of the upper 50%? Seems to me you want to reward the people who don't do well and take away from those who score well. Sure makes a lot of sense....(Sarcasm)
Don't be too sure - I thought I read somewhere near the bottom of the copy of the piece of legislation that the two lists were to be numbered randomly each...

t13one12
04-01-2005, 12:24 PM
Random numbering is even worse. They are turning this into a sign-up sheet instead of a test.

erics99
04-01-2005, 02:48 PM
The reason for the purposed legislation is simple: To hire more minorities and women.

Bones42
04-01-2005, 03:31 PM
erics99, are you saying that minorities and women score lower on the tests?

FFFRED
04-01-2005, 03:33 PM
This is the biggest sham to ever face the Civil Service system. This Civil Service system was developed to ensure those with the greatest Merit and Fitness get the job and those who don't at least minimum standards don't get hired. Not those who know someone, have some BS certifications (FF2,etc.) college degrees or have a particular race, ethnicity, religion or sexual orientation!

We want the very brightest and the most physically capable out there. Although there is a very good argument out there that the physical has been eroded over time and is now very easy for those of average physical strength and endurance to pass.

The physical used to be so difficult that almost no one got a perfect 100% on it. It was meant to push you to your limits. Along with the written scores if you didn't score in the 90% range your name died on the list and you didn't get the job. There were 10,000s of applicants and only the top few 1000 would get hired. You had to really want the job. Today EMS slugs can get on before anyone in the open completive so long as they get a passing score. That means they can FAIL two events and still get hired before someone who passed all events! That is just shameful.

I know EMS transfers that couldn't pass all the events...white, black, male, female...we don't want weak white males anymore than we want weak black females...We want all to be the most physically capable no matter their skin color or what they got between their legs.

In fact this is the one and only point the Vulcans and the UFA have ever agreed on is that the physical should be much tougher and weighted accordingly. This is because 1. We want physically capable members and 2. The Vulcans know that minorities do very well on the physical and by weighting it with greater weight you would hire more minorities in the long run. However there is one problem...The women are completely against it and if some of them had their way would have NO physical.

The written is nothing more than a way to see if you have basic aptitudes, intelligence, reasoning etc. It is geared to a 12th Grade level even though we require college credits today. Don't be surprised it these race baiting half-wit politicians try to change that requirement as well.

Residency was created to give a hand up to minorities who lived in the city and thus a 5 points. However they couldn't just offer it to Blacks and women so they had to offer it to everyone. Veterans credits are to recognize those who have given service to their country and a job once out of the military.
Legacy credit is the credit no one wants as it means your parents died in the LOD while in one of the uniformed services. It is meant as a sign of gratitude to the family that a son or daughter should choose to become a cop or fireman etc. after their parent gave their life in the service of the city.

You can see the difference when someone who had residency and veterans credits gets on the job at the end of the list...they are usually not the brightest out there. When one can't even get a respectable score on a test made for imbeciles it doesn't speak well for their intelligence and it usually shows in the firehouse.

Something interesting in the past few years is that Hispanics have been coming on the job with ease and don't seem to have the same problems other minorities are claiming to have. Why is that? Why aren't they up in arms like the vulcans? Could it be they want qualified applicants and the best of the best?

The worst part of all of this is that these politicians are only insulting the very people they claim to represent and help. They claim that women and minorities can't meet even these ridiculously easy tests. If I were in either of the above groups I would be insulted.

Why is that tests for the Traffic agents, Police Dept, Correction, Motor men and Conductors, which are ALL listed in the same papers and postings as every other test given by DCAS...have no problem in recruiting women and minorities? Could it be that there isn't that much interest in firefighting in these communities?

The FDNY entrance exam is hands down the easiest and least discriminatory ANYWHERE in the country. This proposal is the most insulting and revolting thing ever to be presented before the city council.

This directly affects the safety and security of all residents, visitors and tourists to NYC.

If you know anyone who is a resident of NYC-call them and have them voice their displeasure with the proposal.

TAKE THE TEST-PASS THE TEST WITH THE BEST SCORE-GET THE JOB

FTM-PTB

erics99
04-01-2005, 03:43 PM
Originally posted by Bones42
erics99, are you saying that minorities and women score lower on the tests?

Percentage wise, probably. In fact I believe it’s been proven. Isn't it ironic on the timing of this legislation, with all of the articles on the city counsel wanting to hire more minorities, etc? Is it too far fetched to think that this legislation will enable the city to hire more minorities than current standards allow for?

cfdeng3
04-01-2005, 03:49 PM
Not unheard of in FD hiring. When people signed up for the last Providence FD test, they were told there would be three lists. White males, females and other minorities. They If there were three openings they would take one from each list. It didn't necessarily matter how well they did on the test.

Bones42
04-01-2005, 03:51 PM
We want the very brightest and the most physically capable out there. Shame on you! ;)

FFFRED
04-01-2005, 03:54 PM
Not unheard of in FD hiring. When people signed up for the last Providence FD test, they were told there would be three lists. White males, females and other minorities. They If there were three openings they would take one from each list. It didn't necessarily matter how well they did on the test.

I thought "Seperate but equal" wasn't kosher anymore...lets say since the 1960s!!! :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

FTM-PTB

t13one12
04-01-2005, 04:43 PM
FFRED, excellent post. Couldn't be put any better. I wholeheartedly agree with everything you said.

1yankeesfan
04-01-2005, 05:18 PM
Just curious, for any of you guys from NYC that may be following this thread...do you think this legislation will pass? What are the chances of it actually passing. It seems to me that the FDNY admin. would have alot of problems with it. I know that there is a seperate city agency that hires for the fire dept., im just curious if the FDNY actually has any say about this. I personally am attending John Jay in the fall, moving to the bx., and working a crappy bartenders job in manhattan, just to qualify for the 5 residency points when they test in 2006. I think this new law, if approved, would really affect my chances of getting hired, considering I am a white male. Anyway, if anyone out there familiar with this could elaborate, and let me know if this thing could actually pass into law, i would appreciate it. Thanks alot.

RESERVE172
04-01-2005, 07:57 PM
Originally posted by t13one12
FFRED, excellent post. Couldn't be put any better. I wholeheartedly agree with everything you said. FROM UP HERE IN QUOTA FREE (finally) BOSTON, DITTO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

snowball
04-01-2005, 08:14 PM
Originally posted by FORTff

In contrast, 65% of New York City residents are minorities and 50% are women.


Someone please explain this to me as we have the same type of thinking in California.
How can 65% of anything be in the minority??

RESERVE172
04-01-2005, 08:43 PM
Originally posted by snowball



Someone please explain this to me as we have the same type of thinking in California.
How can 65% of anything be in the minority?? HA!!!!!! No sh*t! I have never thought about it that way. Excellent point! Has the white boy become the minority? If so, I want an extra 5 points for it! :D BTW- I wonder what the City Council's response to this would be?

t13one12
04-01-2005, 08:55 PM
They would probably take away firehouse forums from all their members, and then tell them they can't wear red white and blue on the fourth of July.

RESERVE172
04-01-2005, 09:06 PM
Then they would probably insist it's their right to burn the American flag while they celebrate .............oh wait, they already do that.

IrishFireMedic1
09-25-2006, 04:50 PM
So did this get put into law or what?

Steeda83
09-25-2006, 05:52 PM
this is why alot, not all, departments test you in a few ways

written test
(you should be able to do a decent job by studying if you really want the job you'll try)

physical agility test
(even you are a "book worm" you're still going to have to have the physical strength and endurance to pass it)

oral interview
(to find out what kind of person you are)

medical/psych/drug

..if you pass all this you deserve the job

..if you don't pass all this you don't deserve the job

USAFSSGT
09-25-2006, 06:27 PM
"Why should someone with military time, residency credit get in before someone who doesn't quilify for the same perks" quote

IMHO someone that has done military time does deserve an advantage. Why? IMO someone that has completed HONORABLE military service has already demonstrated that they are capable of maintaning them selves in a professional manner, able and willing to accept training, have a respect for rank structure, simple responseabitliy (i.e. being on time, presentable image, maintaining finances/legal responsablitys, ect.). Just to name a few, I could go on and on.

Now I am not saying everyone with military service is going to be a all-star. But atleast they do have some what of a proven history. If I were going to invest my training dollars; two canidates with similar scores one with a HONORABLE military service, one with out. My decision is obvious. Again I am not saying that military service will ensure a good canidate, but it does say something.

If this does stir up a big argument, just let me apologize in advance.

NortheastFF
09-25-2006, 06:38 PM
Those Five Guys That Stood Up And Fought The Good Fight In Boston Should Be Canonized!!!

Firetacoma1
09-25-2006, 06:46 PM
"Why should someone with military time, residency credit get in before someone who doesn't quilify for the same perks" quote

IMHO someone that has done military time does deserve an advantage. Why? IMO someone that has completed HONORABLE military service has already demonstrated that they are capable of maintaning them selves in a professional manner, able and willing to accept training, have a respect for rank structure, simple responseabitliy (i.e. being on time, presentable image, maintaining finances/legal responsablitys, ect.). Just to name a few, I could go on and on.

Now I am not saying everyone with military service is going to be a all-star. But atleast they do have some what of a proven history. If I were going to invest my training dollars; two canidates with similar scores one with a HONORABLE military service, one with out. My decision is obvious. Again I am not saying that military service will ensure a good candidate, but it does say something.

If this does stir up a big argument, just let me apologize in advance.

How about someone in good standing with a volunteer fire organization? Haven't they also shown traits that would make them desirable to a paid organization?

Steeda83
09-25-2006, 06:57 PM
it's simple

if you were in the military and left with an honoralbe discharge...that tells people something about u(good things about u)..you can take orders, you can follow a rank structure, you're quick thinking, etc..
NOT TO MENTION HE/SHE is/was willing to give their life for this country and served voluntairly!..if you want the extra points sign up for the service

as for residency..if they live in the city..they tend to know the people, streets, occupancies alot better than some1 from the outside...
and again if you want the points..move into that community!

military and residency points.make more sense than any of the other reasons such as minority preference

Steeda83
09-25-2006, 07:00 PM
How about someone in good standing with a volunteer fire organization? Haven't they also shown traits that would make them desirable to a paid organization?


yes..but thats not available to everyone..if you happen to be an innercity kid..chances are there are no volunteer departments close enough for u to be a member of...making it not as fair an option as military and residency...you can move or join the military freely...to move out of state or an hour away just to join a volunteer department is a little much..moving to get a paid job makes a little more sense

mark440
09-25-2006, 07:33 PM
It won't work unless they sign up to take the test. The city handed out plenty of free applications when everyone else had to pay $25 to take the exam and spent over a million dollars on a recruitment campaign aimed at minorities and women....not necesarily the best firefighters.

Not if they SIGN up, but if they SHOW up to take the test.

*Mark

FireSiren06
09-25-2006, 07:41 PM
Just for your info - here in my dept women are not minorities - since they are 50% of the population - The score is the score - It only took me 8 years to top the list and pass the academy, but, hey - at least I got in on my own merits and not because I happened to be related to some deputy chief!

FS

IrishFireMedic1
10-02-2006, 05:25 PM
it's simple

if you were in the military and left with an honoralbe discharge...that tells people something about u(good things about u)..you can take orders, you can follow a rank structure, you're quick thinking, etc..
NOT TO MENTION HE/SHE is/was willing to give their life for this country and served voluntairly!..if you want the extra points sign up for the service

as for residency..if they live in the city..they tend to know the people, streets, occupancies alot better than some1 from the outside...
and again if you want the points..move into that community!

military and residency points.make more sense than any of the other reasons such as minority preference

At the same time you can't get veteran points unless you have residency points

Steeda83
10-02-2006, 05:27 PM
At the same time you can't get veteran points unless you have residency points


which department are you talking about?FDNY? for the departments in my area thats untrue

VinnieB
10-02-2006, 05:39 PM
At the same time you can't get veteran points unless you have residency points


Wow....then how did I get hired?

nyckftbl
10-02-2006, 06:15 PM
At the same time you can't get veteran points unless you have residency points

Who told you that gem?

SBrooks
10-02-2006, 06:27 PM
yes..but thats not available to everyone..if you happen to be an innercity kid..chances are there are no volunteer departments close enough for u to be a member of...making it not as fair an option as military and residency...you can move or join the military freely...to move out of state or an hour away just to join a volunteer department is a little much..moving to get a paid job makes a little more sense

As a point of fact, our military isn't available for everyone, Consciencious Objecters (Quakers and the like) & Homosexuals come to mind.

Not that I disapprove of veteran's preference, as long as the scoring is such that add-on points only marginally affect your likelihood of hiring.

It seems that NYC has a different passing score for people with bonus points and people without. I.e. now you could score a paltry 60 on the exam, but with 25 bonus points, you'd be in the mix with everyone else.

If you want women & 'minorities' to pass the test, put them through a pre-test prep course.

Steeda83
10-02-2006, 06:53 PM
As a point of fact, our military isn't available for everyone, Consciencious Objecters (Quakers and the like) & Homosexuals come to mind.

Not that I disapprove of veteran's preference, as long as the scoring is such that add-on points only marginally affect your likelihood of hiring.

It seems that NYC has a different passing score for people with bonus points and people without. I.e. now you could score a paltry 60 on the exam, but with 25 bonus points, you'd be in the mix with everyone else.

If you want women & 'minorities' to pass the test, put them through a pre-test prep course.


the military is available to everyone...you are not born with quaker skin, if you want to join the military that badly you can decide to no longer be a quaker, the military doesnt tell quakers they cant join, quakers say they wont..as far as homosexuality, it's called don't ask, don't tell

IrishFireMedic1
10-08-2006, 03:57 PM
Who told you that gem?

Guy on the other fourm told me about that. Said he heard it straight from DCAS. So yeah pretty much I heard it from someone who heard it from someone.

VinnieB
10-08-2006, 04:33 PM
Guy on the other fourm told me about that. Said he heard it straight from DCAS. So yeah pretty much I heard it from someone who heard it from someone.


You should have researched that a bit better. I got hired with vets credit..and at the time, I lived in Orange County. I did live in Brooklyn at one point, but it wasn't during the time period required by DCAS, nor did I claim city residency.

FyredUp
10-08-2006, 05:05 PM
Every time I read something like this I am so happy to be closer to retirement than to starting my career.

It seems that those that don't understand the job of firefighting, the hard physical labor, the being able to muster more than one rational thought at a time, the ability to think quickly and be resourceful, the ability to be able to express yourself in a clear manner using proper English and all else that makes one a good firefighter, are destined to try and destroy the job as we know it.

I express my deepest sympathies to all those who suffer the watering down of our job.

FyredUp

IrishFireMedic1
10-08-2006, 06:32 PM
You should have researched that a bit better. I got hired with vets credit..and at the time, I lived in Orange County. I did live in Brooklyn at one point, but it wasn't during the time period required by DCAS, nor did I claim city residency.

I went with what was off of the Special Circumstances sheet from DCAS that said you had to be a resident of NY State. I have been hearing a lot of conflicting info, so i decided not to claim the points. I would rather have a solid number instead of showing up for my interview and finding out that im a few hundred spots down from my orig number because i didn't satisify all the requirements.

mcfd45
10-09-2006, 01:39 AM
Those that served our military should get a few extra points for the following reasons.
1: They served in our military and defended OUR country.
2: It makes a man(woman) out of a boy(girl).
3: It exposes the person to a paramilitary organization (following order, PT, comraderie, an academy type setting (basic).
If they have been honorably discharged yes they have earned these benefits, if not then no they don't.

I have no opinion on the residency thing as I see both sides. The city wants to help their people first, which is cool. But it might not be fair to someone who isn't in town. But the person might know the streets a little better. I could go on for days about this but I won't. here is my final say on this, If my house is burning I don't give a dam if you are white, black, red, yellow, green, guy, girl, tranny, chinese, japanese, smurf, or a mime. I do care that the city hired the best person for the job and didn't settle for second best.
J

jonnyirons
10-10-2006, 12:09 AM
You guys cant be that blind that you dont know who this is targeting. Its targeting the inner city scum that cant read or write that do poorly reading the subway map let alone the exam! thats my only hope, that all these skells taking this next exam dont have the car or the money to get to the rock everyday. And if you stick up for these people you must be one of them, cause the guys i went to proby school with who didnt have cars or money to get through it made it through, so what they woke up an hour before us, which was 2 hours before it started. But for 25 grand i hope it keeps only the guys that want to be there, not the ones that have to!

Stay Safe

mcfd45
10-10-2006, 12:32 AM
You guys cant be that blind that you dont know who this is targeting. Its targeting the inner city scum that cant read or write that do poorly reading the subway map let alone the exam! thats my only hope, that all these skells taking this next exam dont have the car or the money to get to the rock everyday. And if you stick up for these people you must be one of them, cause the guys i went to proby school with who didnt have cars or money to get through it made it through, so what they woke up an hour before us, which was 2 hours before it started. But for 25 grand i hope it keeps only the guys that want to be there, not the ones that have to!

Stay Safe
So that's how you got the job eh!
J

LaFireEducator
10-10-2006, 09:35 AM
You beat me to it MCFD as it seems to me that poor little Johnny can't write either.

FFFRED
10-11-2006, 12:59 AM
It seems that NYC has a different passing score for people with bonus points and people without. I.e. now you could score a paltry 60 on the exam, but with 25 bonus points, you'd be in the mix with everyone else.

It seems you've made some very large assumptions...

You need a passing score for ones points to be considered...as for 25 points...I only know of one way to get that and 10 of those are ones I never would want any part of.

If you want women & 'minorities' to pass the test, put them through a pre-test prep course.

Are women and minorities somehow incapable of passing an exam without this "prep course" you speak of? Are they somehow not equal to other groups of persons that they need this boost to ensure they can compete with others?

FTM-PTB

ubshockey
10-12-2006, 09:03 PM
A true test based on merit and desire for the job:

1. Reserve the Garden for a day.
2. Give each applicant a large stick.
3. Send everyone in, then lock the doors.
4. First X number to make it out in one piece get the job.

Actually, it kind of sounds like a Ranger game.

mcfd45
10-13-2006, 01:05 AM
A true test based on merit and desire for the job:


4. First X number to make it out in one piece get the job.


This is the only part I disagree with. It should say the last X people alive.
J

DennisTheMenace
10-13-2006, 09:47 AM
Keep all the book smart people. I want street smart people.When you discover a fair and neutral way of scoreing such a thing keep it to yourself until you get a patent on the idea.

DennisTheMenace
10-13-2006, 09:49 AM
How about someone in good standing with a volunteer fire organization? Haven't they also shown traits that would make them desirable to a paid organization?Yeah cause 5-10 hours a week shows the same committment as someone who signs up to serve his country for four years 24/7..... :rolleyes: